Estimating the causal effects of social interaction with endogenous networks

Political Analysis

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 316-328

  Rogowski, Jon C ^a   Sinclair, Betsy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864510397     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps016     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Angrist, Joshua D., Guido W. Imbens, and Donald B. Rubin. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91:444-55.
2. Beck, Nathaniel, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, and Kyle Beardsley. 2006. Space is more than geography: Using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50:27-44.
3. Caldeira, Gregory A., and Samuel C. Patterson. 1987. Political friendship in the legislature. Journal of Politics 49:953-75.
4. Durbin, Kathie. 2010. Herrera feels like big winner for D.C. office. The Columbian, November 19. http://www.columbian.com/news/ 2010/nov/19/herrera-winner-office-lottery (accessed February 23, 2011).
5. Fisher, Ronald A. 1935. Design of experiments. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.
6. Fowler, James H. 2005. Legislative cosponsorship networks in the U.S. House and Senate. Social Networks 28:454-65.
7. Fowler, James H. 2006. Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis 14:456-87.
8. Franzese, Robert J., and Jude C. Hays. 2007. Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis 15:140-64.
9. Hansen, Ben B., and Jake Bowers. 2009. Attributing effects to a cluster-randomized get-out-the-vote campaign. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104:873-85.
10. Kingdon, John. 1989. Congressmen's voting decisions. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. Krehbiel, Keith, and Jonathan Woon. 2005. Selection criteria for roll call votes. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
12. Manski, Charles F. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60:531-42.
13. Masket, Seth. 2008. Where you sit is where you stand: The impact of seating proximity on legislative cue-taking. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3:301-11.
14. Matthews, Donald R., and James A. Stimson. 1975. Yeas and nays: Normal decision-making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Wiley InterScience.
15. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:415-44.
16. Murray, Michael P. 2006. Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20:111-32.
17. Phillips, Michael M., and Danny Yadron. 2010. Pajama party: New to Congress, many members plan to sleep over. Wall Street Journal, November 29. http://online.wsj.org/article/SB10001424052748703559504575630661395762460.html (accessed February 23, 2011).
18. Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116:681-704.
19. Shalizi, Cosmo Rohilla, and Andrew C. Thomas. 2011. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research 40:211-39.
20. Staiger, Douglas, and James H. Stock. 1997. Instrumental variables regressions with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557-86.
21. Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. 2007. Introduction to econometrics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Truman, David B. 1956. The state delegations and the structure of party voting in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 50:1023-45.
23. Young, James Sterling. 1966. The Washington community, 1800-1828. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.