Developing spatially explicit footprints of plausible land-use scenarios in the Santa Cruz Watershed, Arizona and Sonora

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 225-235

  Norman, Laura M ^a   Feller, Mark ^a   Villarreal, Miguel L ^b  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative scenarios; Cellular automaton; Modeling; SLEUTH; Urban growth; US Mexico border

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LAND USE; MODELS; POPULATION STATISTICS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATERSHEDS;

ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS; EXPONENTIAL GROWTH; LAND-USE MANAGEMENT; LOCAL POPULATIONS; ME-XICO; SLEUTH; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; URBAN GROWTH MODELING;

URBAN GROWTH;

CALIBRATION; DECISION MAKING; GROWTH MODELING; LAND USE CHANGE; POPULATION ESTIMATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN POPULATION;

ARCADIA [PELOPONNISOS]; ARIZONA; GREECE; MEGALOPOLIS; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; PELOPONNISOS; SANTA CRUZ COUNTY [ARIZONA]; SONORA; UNITED STATES;

POACEAE; PROSOPIS;

EID: 84864502772     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adger W.N., Hughes T.P., Folke Carl Carpenter Stephen R., Rockström J. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 2005, 309(5737):1036-1039. 10.1126/science.1112122.
2. Al-kheder S., Wang J., Shan J. Fuzzy inference guided cellular automata urban-growth modelling using multi-temporal satellite images. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2008, 22(11):1271-1293. 10.1080/13658810701617292.
3. Almeida C.M., Gleriani J.M., Castejon E.F., Soares-Filho B.S. Using neural networks and cellular automata for modelling intra-urban land-use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2008, 22(9):943-963.
4. Anderson H.W., Hoover M.D., Reinhart K.G. Forests and water: Effects of forest management on floods, sedimentation, and water supply. Notes 1976.
5. Anderson J.B. The U.S.-Mexico border: A half century of change. The Social Science Journal 2003, 40(4):535-554. doi:16/S0362-3319(03)00067-3.
6. Ash N., Bennett K., Reid W., Irwin F., Ranganathan J., Scholes R., et al. Assessing ecosystems, ecosystem services, and human well-being. Ecosystems and human well-being: A manual for assessment practitioners 2010, Island Press. 1st ed. N. Ash, Blanco H., Brown C., Garcia K., Tomich T., Vira B., Zurek M. (Eds.).
7. Bartlett, A. (1998). Reflections on sustainability: Population growth, and the environment-revisited. Available from http://www.mnforsustain.org/bartlett_a_reflections_on_sustainability.htm.
8. Beal, T. (2010, May 27). Imagine Tucson in the sun corridor. Arizona Daily Star. Available from http://azstarnet.com/news/local/article_e0d1cd18-6c4f-5405-8d06-4f4c14f9e713.html.
9. Berkes F., Folke C., Colding J. Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience 2000, Cambridge Univ Pr.
10. Bonan G.B. Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 2008, 320(5882):1444-1449. 10.1126/science.1155121.
11. Candau J. Calibrating a cellular automaton model of urban growth in a timely manner. Problems, Prospects and Research Needs. Presented at the 4th international conference on integrating GIS and environmental modeling (GIS/EM4) 2000, University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, Available from http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/∼kclarke/ucime/banff2000/529-jc-paper.htm.
12. Carr-Saunders A.M. World population: Past growth and present trends 1936, Clarendon Press, ISBN: 0897651170, 9780897651172, p. 336.
13. Chazdon R.L. Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 2008, 320(5882):1458-1460. 10.1126/science.1155365.
14. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S., Gaydos L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24(2):247-261. 10.1068/b240247.
15. Clarke K.C., Gaydos L.J. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 1998, 12(7):699-714.
16. Costanza R., d' Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387(6630):253-260.
17. Daily G.C. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems 1997, Island Press.
18. Daily G., Dasgupta P., Bolin B., Crosson P., du Guerny J., Ehrlich P., et al. Food production, population growth, and the environment. Science 1998, 281(5381):1291-1292. 10.1126/science.281.5381.1291.
19. Dietzel C., Clarke K. The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2006, 30(1):78-101. doi:16/j.compenvurbsys.2005.04.001.
20. Dosskey M., Schultz D., Isenhart T. Riparian buffers for agricultural land. Agroforestry notes 1997, 3. National Agroforestry Center, USDA Forest Service, Lincoln, NE, Available from http://www.unl.edu/nac/agroforestrynotes/an03rfb02.pdf.
21. Ehrlich P.R. The population bomb. New York 1968.
22. Ewel K.C., Twilley R.R., Ong J.E. Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 1998, 7(1):83-94. 10.2307/2997700.
23. Freemark K.E., Merriam H.G. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biological Conservation 1986, 36(2):115-141. doi:16/0006-3207(86)90002-9.
24. Friends of the Santa Cruz River. (2012). Welcome to Friends of the Santa Cruz River (FOSCR)! Available from http://www.friendsofsantacruzriver.org/.
25. Gammage, Jr., G. (2009). Megapolitan: Arizona's Sun Corridor-Morrison Institute. Available from http://morrisoninstitute.asu.edu/morrison-update/megapolitan-arizonas-sun-corridor.
26. Giles-Corti B., Broomhall M.H., Knuiman M., Collins C., Douglas K., Ng K., et al. Increasing walking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 28(2):169-176. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018.
27. Grigione M.M., Menke K., Lopez-Gonzalez C., List R., Banda A., Carrera J., et al. Identifying potential conservation areas for felids in the USA and Mexico: Integrating reliable knowledge across an international border. Oryx 2009, 43(01):78-86. 10.1017/S0030605308002019.
28. Guzy M.R., Smith C.L., Bolte J.P., Hulse D.W., Gregory S.V. Policy research using agent-based modeling to assess future impacts of urban expansion into farmlands and forests. Ecology and Society 2008, Available from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art37/.
29. Hegselmann R. Modeling social dynamics by cellular automata. Computer Modeling of Social Processes 1998, 37-64.
30. Homer C., Dewitz J., Fry J., Coan M., Hossain N., Larson C., et al. Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2007, 73(4):337-341.
31. Huggett A.J. The concept and utility of [']ecological thresholds' in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 2005, 124(3):301-310. doi:16/j.biocon.2005.01.037.
32. Hunting, D., Kalt, J, & Propst, L. (2010). Tucson's new prosperity: Capitalizing on the sun corridor. A Sun Corridor Legacy Program Policy Technical Report Prepared by the Sonoran Institute. 28 p. http://www.sonoraninstitute.org/component/docman/doc_download/907-tucsons-new-prosperity-capitalizing-on-the-sun-corridor.html.
33. Imagine Greater Tucson. (2012). Shaping our future together. Available from http://www.imaginegreatertucson.org/.
34. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2012). Available from http://www.inegi.org.mx/.
35. Jantz C.A., Goetz S.J., Shelley M.K. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2004, 31(2):251-271. 10.1068/b2983.
36. Jantz C.A., Goetz S.J., Donato D., Claggett P. Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2010, 34(1):1-16. doi:16/j.compenvurbsys.2009.08.003.
37. Jones K.B., Slonecker E.T., Nash M.S., Neale A.C., Wade T.G., Hamann S. Riparian habitat changes across the continental United States (1972-2003) and potential implications for sustaining ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 2010, 25(8):1261-1275. 10.1007/s10980-010-9510-1.
38. Kepner, W. G., Semmens, D. J., Hernandez, M. & Goodrich, D. C. (2009). Evaluating hydrological response to forecasted land-use change: Scenario testing with the automated geospatial watershed assessment (AGWA) tool. In R.M.T. Webb, & D.J. Semmens (Eds.), Planning for an Uncertain Future-Monitoring, Integration, and Adaptation. Proceedings of the Third Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5049. pp 79-84. Available from http://www.epa.gov/esd/land-sci/pdf/77-84_Climate%20manuscripts_Kepner.pdf.
39. Labiosa, W. B., Bernknopf, R., Hearn, P., Hogan, D., Strong, D., Pearlstine, et al. (2009). The South Florida ecosystem portfolio model; A map-based multicriteria ecological, economic, and community land-use planning tool: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5181. 41 p. Available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5181/.
40. Li H., Reynolds J.F. Modeling effects of spatial pattern, drought, and grazing on rates of rangeland degradation: A combined Markov and cellular automaton approach. Scale in remote sensing and GIS 1997, 211-230. Lewis Publishers, New York. D.A. Quattrochi, M.F. Goodchild (Eds.).
41. Li X., Yeh A.G.O. Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2000, 14(2):131-152.
42. Liu Y. Modelling urban development with geographical information systems and cellular automata 2008, CRC.
43. Magnani F., Mencuccini M., Borghetti M., Berbigier P., Berninger F., Delzon S., et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 2007, 447(7146):849-851. 10.1038/nature05847.
44. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens III W.W. The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind 1972, Universe Books.
45. McCain E.B., Childs J.L. Evidence of resident jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southwestern United States and the implications for conservation. Journal of Mammalogy 2008, 89(1):1-10.
46. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being 2005, Vol. 5. Island Press.
47. Mönkkönen M., Reunanen P. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: A management perspective. Oikos 1999, 84(2):302-305. doi:10.2307/3546725.
48. Morehouse B.J., Ferguson D.B., Owen G., Browning-Aiken A., Wong-Gonzalez P., Pineda N., et al. Science and socio-ecological resilience: Examples from the Arizona-Sonora Border. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11(3):272-284. doi: 16/j.envsci.2007.07.007.
49. Nasi, R., Wunder, S., & Campos, J. (2002). Forest ecosystem services: Can they pay our way out of deforestation? Available from http://www.fucema.org.ar/old/gef/forest2.pdf.
50. Nie W., Yuan Y., Tallent-Halsell N., Norman L.M., Jackson M., Erickson C. Assessing surface water availability in the Upper Santa Cruz watershed. 65th international soil and water conservation society (SWCS) annual conference 2010, Available from http://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=497308.
51. Norman, L. M., Donelson, A., Pfeifer, E., & Lam, A. H. (2006). Colonia development and land use change in Ambos Nogales, United States-Mexican Border: U.S. geological survey open file report: 2006-1112. Available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1112/.
52. Norman L.M., Feller M., Phillip Guertin D. Forecasting urban growth across the United States-Mexico border. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2009, 33(2):150-159.
53. Norman L., Tallent-Halsell N., Labiosa W., Weber M., McCoy A., Hirschboeck K., et al. Developing an ecosystem services online decision support tool to assess the impacts of climate change and urban growth in the santa cruz watershed; where we live, work, and play. Sustainability 2010, 2(7):2044-2069. Available from http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/7/2044/.
54. Norman L.M., Villarreal M., Lara-Valencia F., Yongping Y., Nie W., Wilson S., et al. Mapping socio-environmentally vulnerable populations access and exposure to ecosystem services at the U.S.-Mexico borderlands. Applied Geography 2012, 34:413-424.
55. Oguz H., Klein A.G., Srinivasan R. Using the sleuth urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria CMSA. Research Journal of Social Sciences 2007, 2:72-82.
56. Phipps M. Dynamical behavior of cellular automata under the constraint of neighborhood coherence. Geographical analysis 1989, 21(3):197-215.
57. Povilitis, A. (2008). Protecting habitat for the Northern Jaguar, USA and Mexico in Jaguar News, USA and Mexico in Jaguar News. Available from http://e-commerce.cultura.com.br/shopping/lojas/1407/html/newsletter/21_out08/informativoingles_21out.html.
58. Santé I., García A.M., Miranda D., Crecente R. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: A review and analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 96(2):108-122.
59. Silva E.A., Clarke K.C. Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2002, 26(6):525-552. doi:16/S0198-9715(01)00014-X.
60. Spackman S.C., Hughes J.W. Assessment of minimum stream corridor width for biological conservation: Species richness and distribution along mid-order streams in Vermont, USA. Biological Conservation 1995, 71(3):325-332. doi: 16/0006-3207(94)00055-U.
61. Steinitz C. Alternative futures for changing landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora 2003, Island Press.
62. Stevens D., Dragicevic S., Rothley K. iCity: A GIS-CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22(6):761-773.
63. Stromberg J.C. Riparian mesquite forests: A review of their ecology, threats, and recovery potential. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 1993, 27(1):111-124.
64. United Nations World summit outcome document 15 September 2005, World Health Organization, Available from http://www.who.int/hiv/universalaccess2010/worldsummit.pdf.
65. US Census Bureau. (2012). American FactFinder. Available from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml.
66. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Watershed Priorities: Santa Cruz | Region 9: Water | US EPA. Available from http://www.epa.gov/region9/water/watershed/santacruz.html.
67. US Geological Survey. (2012). U.S.-Mexico border environmental health initiative-home page. Available from http://borderhealth.cr.usgs.gov/projectindex.html.
68. Vest M.J. The recovery is stronger than appreciated. In Arizona's Economy 2010, October, Economic and Business Research Center, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona, Available from http://azeconomy.eller.arizona.edu/azeconomyissues/AEFall10.pdf.
69. Villarreal, M. L., Norman, L. M., Wallace, C. S. A., & van Riper III, C. (2011). A multi-temporal (1979-2009) land use/land cover data set of the binational Santa Cruz watershed, U.S. Geological survey open-file report 2011-1131. 25 p. Available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1131/.
70. Walker B., Holling C.S., Carpenter S., Kinzig R., Resilience A. Adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and society 2004, 9(2):5.
71. Welsch D.J. Riparian forest buffers: Function and design for protection and enhancement of water resources 1991, US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State & Private Forestry, Forest Resources Management.
72. White R., Engelen G. High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, environment and urban systems 2000, 24(5):383-400.
73. World Commission on Environment and Development Our common future 1987, Oxford University Press, USA.
74. Zugmeyer, C., McIntyre, C. L., Brott, E. M., Zamora Arroyo, F., & McCoy, A. L. (2010). A Living River-Charting the Health of the Upper Santa Cruz River 2009 water year. Available from http://www.sonoraninstitute.org/where-we-work/southwest/santa-cruz-river/311-charting-the-health-of-the-upper-santa-cruz-river.html.