Evaluating the impact of caprock and reservoir properties on potential risk of CO2 leakage after injection

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2403-2415

  Hou, Zhangshuan ^a   Rockhold, Mark L ^a   Murray, Christopher J ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Caprock geology; Caprock properties; Carbon sequestration; Seal integrity

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUMERICAL MODELS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; POROSITY; RESERVOIRS (WATER);

CAPROCK; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; OPERATIONAL MODES; QUASI-MONTE CARLO SAMPLINGS; RESERVOIR PERMEABILITY; RESERVOIR POROSITY; RESERVOIR PROPERTY; SEAL INTEGRITY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CAP ROCK; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; LEAKAGE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION; SEALING;

EID: 84864469088     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-1465-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6): 716-723. doi: 10. 1109/TAC. 1974. 1100705.
2. 2 injection in a saline aquifer at the Sleipner Site, North Sea. Am J Sci 307(7): 974-1008.
3. 2 storage: regulatory and capacity implications. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, Paper LBNL-1716E.
4. Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference, 2nd edn. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, California.
5. Davison AC (2003) Statistical models. Cambridge University Press, New York.
6. Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1990) Physical and chemical hydrogeology. Wiley, New York.
7. 2 leakage through an abandoned well: problem-oriented benchmarks. Comput Geosci 11: 103-115.
8. EIA (2011) Emission of greenhouse gases in the United States: 2009. Energy Information Administration, U. S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Brochure No. DOE/EIA-0573. http://www. eia. gov/environment/emissions/ghg_report/. Accessed 20 July 2011.
9. EPA (1994) Determination of maximum injection pressure for Class I wells. Water Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5, Chicago, IL, Underground Injection Control Section Regional Guidance #7. http://www. epa. gov/r5water/uic/r5guid/r5_07. htm. Accessed 29 March 2011.
10. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
11. FutureGen Alliance (2006) Mattoon site environmental information volume. Washington, DC. http://www. futuregenalliance. org/news/evi. stm. Accessed 23 March 2011.
12. Hastie TJ (1991) Generalized additive models. In: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds) Statistical models in S. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 249-308, Chapter 7.
13. Hastie TJ, Pregibon D (1992) Generalized linear models. In: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds) Statistical models in S. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 196-248, Chapter 6.
14. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, London.
15. Hou Z, Rubin Y (2005) On MRE concepts and prior compatibility issues in vadose zone inverse and forward modeling. Water Resour Res 41: W12425. doi: 10. 1029/2005WR004082.
16. IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), technical report prepared by Working Group III, Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Itasca (1997) FLAC3D manual. Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions: version 2. 0. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis.
18. Katz DL, Coats KH (1968) Underground storage of fluids. Ulrich's Bookstore, Ann Arbor.
19. Leetaru HE, Morse DG, Bauer R, Frailey S, Keefer D, Kolata D, Korose C, Mehnert DMW, Rittenhouse S, Drahovzal J, Fisher S, McBride J (2005) Saline reservoirs as a sequestration target. In: Finley R (principal investigator) An assessment of geological carbon sequestration options in the Illinois Basin. Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, pp 253-324.
20. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London.
21. 2 leakage through an abandoned well. Environ Sci Technol 39(2): 602-611.
22. 2 injection into saline aquifers. Environ Geol 42: 282-295. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-001-0498-3.
23. 2. In: SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, 26-28 February 2001, San Antonio, Pap SPE-66537.
24. 2-injection into a brine formation. Environ Geol 42: 296-305. doi: 10. 1007/s00254-001-0499-2.
25. Schlomer S, Krooss BM (1997) Experimental characterization of the hydrocarbon sealing efficiency of cap rocks. Mar Pet Geol 14: 565-580.
26. Soeder DJ (1988) Porosity and permeability of eastern Devonian gas shale. SPE [Society of Petroleum Engineers] Formation Evaluation 3(2): 116-124. doi: 10. 2118/15213-PA.
27. Tarantola A (2005) Inverse problem theory and model parameter estimation. Soc Indus Appl Math, Philadelphia.
28. 2 stored in deep geological formations, 1st edn. US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory DOE/NETL-311/081508, Morgantown, West Virginia.
29. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York.
30. White MD, Oostrom M (2000) STOMP (Subsurface transport over multiple phases) version 2. 0-theory guide. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, PNNL-12030.
31. White MD, Oostrom M (2006) STOMP Subsurface transport over multiple phases version 4. 0: user's guide. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, PNNL-15782.
32. Yang Y, Aplin AC (2007) Permeability and petrophysical properties of 30 natural mudstones. J Geophys Res 112: B03206. doi: 10. 1029/2005JB004243.