Maintenance policy: Degradation laws versus hidden Markov model availability indicator

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability

Volumn 226, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 137-155

  Vrignat, P ^a   Avila, M ^a   Duculty, F ^a   Aupetit, S ^b   Slimane, M ^b   Kratz, F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^c ENSI   (France)

Author keywords

assessment; degradation laws; diagnosis; hidden Markov model; maintenance management

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; CONTINUOUS SYSTEM; DAMAGE LEVEL; MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT; MAINTENANCE POLICY; MAINTENANCE STRATEGIES; MARKOVIAN; NON-PARAMETRIC; SEMIPARAMETRIC; SOCIO-ECONOMICS;

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COMPETITION; DEGRADATION; DIAGNOSIS; FOOD PROCESSING; MAINTENANCE;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS;

EID: 84864465678     PISSN: 1748006X     EISSN: 17480078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1748006X11406335     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Valdez-Florez C., Feldman R. M.. A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Naval Res. Logist.. 1989 ; 36: 419-446
2. Simeu-Abazi Z., Sassine C.. Maintenance integration in manufacturing systems by using stochastic Petri nets. Int. J. Prod. Res.. 1999 ; 37: 3927-3940 (Pubitemid 30531938)
3. Castanier B., Bérenguer C., Grall A.. A sequential condition-based repair/replacement policy with non-periodic inspections for a system subject to continuous wear. Appl. Stoch. Models Busin. Ind. 2003 ; 19 (4). 327-347
4. Dieulle L., Bérenguer C., Grall A., Roussignol M.. Sequential condition based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. Eur. J. Opl. Res.. 2003 ; 150: 451-461
5. WelteT.Deterioration and maintenance models for components in hydropower plants. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Productions and Quality Engineering, 2008.
6. Soro I-W., Nourelfath M., Aït-Kadi D.. Performance Evaluation of multi-state degraded systems with minimal repairs and imperfect maintenance. Reliab. Engng Syst. Safety. 2010 ;: 65-69
7. Wang H.. A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur. J. Opl. Res.. 2002 ;: 469-489 (Pubitemid 34249626)
8. Chandler A. D. J. R. Stratégie et structures de l'entreprise. Paris: Les Editions d'Organisation ; 1989
9. Deloux E., Castanier B., Bérenguer C.. Maintenance policy for a deteriorating system evolving in a stressful environment. Proc. IMechE. Part O: J. Risk and Reliability. 2008 ; 222 (4). 613-622
10. Thietart R. A., Martinet A. C. Stratégies: actualité et futurs de la recherche. Paris: Editions Vuibert / FNEGE ; 2001
11. Moubray J. Reliability centered maintenance. 2 nd edition, 1997 (Industrial Press, New York). New York: Industrial Press ; 1997
12. N. F. E. N. 13-306, maintenance terms, 2001.
13. Phimister J., Oktem U., Kleindorfer P. R., Kunreuther H.. Near-miss incident management in the chemical process industry. Risk Analysis. 2003 ; 23 (3). 445-459 (Pubitemid 36693478)
14. Wireman T. Total productive maintenance. 2 nd edition, 2004 (Industrial Press, New York). New York: Industrial Press ; 2004
15. Bérenguer C., Chĝtelet E., Langeron Y., Despujols A.. Modeling and simulation of maintenance strategies using stochastic Petri nets. Proceedings of MMR 2004 Conference on mathematical methods in reliability ; Santa Fe, NM ;..
16. CotainaN.MatosF.ChabrolJ.DjeapragacheD.PreteP.CarreteroJ.GarcíaF. PerezM.PenaJ. M.PerezJ. M.Study of existing reliability centered maintenance (RCM) approaches used in different industries, TR Number FIM/110.1/DATSI/00, Facultad de Informatica de Madrid, 2000.
17. Bérenguer C.. On the mathematical condition-based maintenance modelling for continuously deteriorating systems. Int. J. Mater. Struct. Reliab.. 2008 ; 6 (2). 133-151
18. Bouvard F., Artus S., Bérenguer C., Cocquempot V.. Maintenance cost study for deteriorating systems: age-replacement policy vs condition-based maintenance policy. Int. J. Mater. Struct. Reliab.. 2008 ; 6 (2). 167-179
19. Ebeling C. E. Introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill ; 1997
20. Birolini A. Quality and reliability of technical systems. Berlin: Springer ; 1994
21. Bertholon H., Bousquet N., Celeux G.. An alternative competing risk model to the Weibull distribution for modelling aging in lifetime data analysis. Lifetime Data Analysis. 2006 ; 12 (4). 481-504
22. N. F. E. N. 13306X60-319, Reliability, Availability and Maintainability, 2001.
23. C. E. I. 812, Procedures for performing a failure modes and effects analysis, 1985.
24. Brookmeyer R., Crowley J.. A confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrika. 1985 ; 72 (3). 619-625
25. Cheuk-Kit W., Eng Wie T.. Survival over 5 years in the initial hospital survivors with acute coronary syndrome: a comparison between a community hospital and a tertiary hospital in New Zealand. J. New Zealand Med. Assoc.. 2007 ; 120 ( 1261 ):
26. Lo S. H., Mack Y. P., Wang J. L.. Density and hazard rate estimation for censored data via strong representation of the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Probab. Theor. Relat. Fields. 1989 ; 80: 461-473
27. Bitouzé D., Laurent B., Massart P.. A Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz type inequality for the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré. 1999 ; 35: 735-763
28. Kalbfleisch J. D., Prentice R. L. The statistical analysis of failure time data. 2 nd edition, 2002 (Wiley, New York). New York: Wiley ; 2002
29. Breslow N.. Applications to clinical trials of multiple regression models for censored survival data. The Scientific Meeting of the Committee on Controlled Therapeutic Trials of the U.I.C.C ; ;..
30. Cox D. R.. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc.. 1972 ; B 34: 187-220
31. Ayyub B., Mccuen R. Probability, statistics and reliability for engineers. New York: CRC Press ; 1997
32. Hoang P. Handbook of reliability engineering. Springer ; 2003 Berlin
33. Hastings N. A. J.. The repair limit replacement method. Opl. Res. 1969 ; 20: 337-349
34. Doyen L., Gaudoin O.. Classes of imperfect repair models based on reduction of failure intensity or virtual age. Reliab. Engng Syst. Safety. 2004 ; 84 (1:45). 45-56
35. Muth E. J.. An optimal decision rule for repair versus replacement. IEEE Trans. Reliab.. 1997 ; R-26: 179-181
36. Phelps R. I.. Replacement policies under minimal repair. J. Opl. Res. Soc.. 1981 ; 32: 549-554
37. Baxter L. A., Kijima M., Tortorella M.. A point process model for the reliability of a maintained system subject to general repair. Commun. Stat. Stochast. Models. 1996 ; 12: 37-65 (Pubitemid 126768693)
38. Kijima M.. Some results for repairable systems with general repair. J. Appl. Probab.. 1989 ; 26: 89-102
39. Basile O., Dehombreux P., Riane F.. Identification of reliability models for non-repairable and repairable systems with small samples. Proceedings of IMS 2004 Conference on Advances in maintenance and modeling, simulation and intelligent monitoring of degradation ; Arles ;..
40. Hopp W. J., Wu S. C.. Multiaction maintenance under Markovian deterioration and incomplete state information. Naval Res. Logist.. 1998 ;: 447-462
41. Meier-Hirmer C., Riboulet G., Sourget F., Roussignol M.. Maintenance optimization for a system with a gamma deterioration process and intervention delay: application to track maintenance. Proc. IMechE, Part O: J. Risk and Reliability. 2009 ; 223 (3). 189-198
42. Innal F., Dutuit Y., Rauzy A., Signoret J. P.. New insight into PFDavg and PFH. Proceedings of European Conference on Reliability, ESREL'08 ; ;..
43. Vrignat P., Avila M., Duculty F., Kratz F.. Use of HMM for evaluation of maintenance activities. Int. J. Adapt. Innov. Syst.. 2010 ; 1 (3/4). 216-232
44. Rabiner L. R.. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE. 1989 ; 77: 257-286
45. Aupetit S., Monmarché N., Slimane M. Advances in metaheuristics for hard optimization. Siarry P. Michalewicz Z., ed. Berlin: Springer ; 2008: 415-438.
46. Baum L. E.. An inequality and associated maximization technique in statistical estimation for probabilistic functions of a Markov process. Inequalities. 1972 ; 3: 1-8
47. Viterbi A. J.. Error bounds for convolutional codes and asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor.. 1967 ; 13: 260-269
48. Commission of the European Communities. On the assessment and management of flood risks, 2007/60/EC, 2007.
49. Commission of the European Communities. Prevention, preparedness and response to terrorist attacks, COM(2004) 698 final, 2004.
50. Vrignat P., Avila M., Duculty F., Kratz F.. Towards a maintenance and servicing indicator. Adv. Prod. Mgmt. Syst. (APMS). 2009 ;: