Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: A prospective cohort study in a University hospital

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 285, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 441-445

  Marengo, Francesca ^a   Larraín, Demetrio ^a   Babilonti, Luciana ^a   Spinillo, Arsenio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Double console da Vinci robot; Learning curve; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; Surgical outcomes

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADNEXA DISEASE; ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEMATOMA; HERNIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INCISION; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LEARNING; MYOMECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TROCAR; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UTERINE FIBROMATOSIS; UTERUS CANCER; UTERUS PROLAPSE;

ADULT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HERNIA; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; ISCHEMIC ATTACK, TRANSIENT; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84864412483     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: 14320711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-2005-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Advincula AP, Wang K (2009) Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:291-301
2. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Unal E, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scien-tiWc dream or reality? Fertil Steril 91:2620-2622
3. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg 191:555-560
4. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G (2010) Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:92-96
5. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshandri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589-594
6. Farquhar CM, Steiner CA (2002) Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstet Gynecol 99:229-234
7. Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M, Tucker L, Bishop M, Das A (2002) Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1521-1527
8. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110:1091-1095
9. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2007) Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:1131e-1-1131e-4
10. Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS 10:317-320
11. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 9:13-15
12. Ferguson JL, Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2004) Making the transition from standard gynecologic laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy. JSLS 8:326-328
13. Göcmen A, Sanlikan F, Ucar MG (2010) Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:163-171
14. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA (2006) Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:60-63
15. Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:286-291
16. Hanly EJ, Miller BE, Kumar R, Hasser CJ, Coste-maniere E, Tala-mini MA et al (2006) Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:445-451
17. Ou CS, Beadle E, Presthus J, Smith M (1994) A multicenter review of 839 laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1:417-422
18. Di Lorenzo M, Coscarella G, Faraci L, Konopacki D, Pietrantuono M, Gaspari AL (2005) Robotic systems and surgical education. JSLS 9:3-12
19. Cho JE, Nezhat FR (2009) Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:669-681
20. Advincula AP (2006) Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparo-scopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 2:305-311
21. Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, Pearl RK, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2007) A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 193:349-355
22. Yeung PP Jr, Pasic RP (2009) Results of the live survey in Las Vegas, 2008, and the response of the AAGL. J Minim Invasive Gyne-col 16:519-521
23. Allen JW, Rivas H, Cacchione RN, Ferzli GS (2003) Intracorpo-real suturing and knot tying broadens the clinical applicability of laparoscopy. JSLS 7:137-140
24. Pareek G, Hedican SP, BishoV JT, Shichman SJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nak-ada SY (2005) Survey from skill-based hands on learning courses demonstrated increased laparoscopic caseload and clinical laparo-scopic suturing. Urology 66:271-273
25. Peiretti M, Zanagnolo V, Bocciolone L, Landoni F, Colombo N, Minig L et al (2009) Robotic surgery: changing the surgical approach of endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:427-431
26. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wechter ME, Ma-grina JF (2009) Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuV dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 114:231-235
27. Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C (2007) Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 21:244-246