Failure prediction for Crack-in-Corrosion defects in natural gas transmission pipelines

International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

Volumn 96-97, Issue , 2012, Pages 90-99

  Bedairi, B ^a   Cronin, D ^a   Hosseini, A ^a   Plumtree, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; ASSESSMENT METHODS; CHARPY IMPACT; CORROSION DEFECT; CRACK DEFECTS; CRITICAL STRENGTH; CURRENT CODES; ELASTIC-PLASTIC FRACTURE MECHANICS; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FAILURE CRITERIA; FAILURE PREDICTION; FAILURE PRESSURE; FAILURE RESPONSE; J TESTING; MATERIAL-BASED; MODEL PREDICTION; NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE; PLASTIC COLLAPSE; RUPTURE TESTS; WALL THICKNESS;

CORROSION RATE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

CRACKS;

EID: 84864411906     PISSN: 03080161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Canadian Energy Pipeline Association, , Accessed September 2009. http://www.cepa.com/.
2. Escoe A.K. Piping and pipeline assessment guide 2006, Elsevier.
3. American Petroleum Institute Recommended practice for fitness for service 2000, API-579.
4. British Standards Institute, BS 7910. Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, BSI-10 2000.
5. ASME B31G Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines 1991, ASME B31G-1991, New York.
6. Cronin D., Plumtree A. Assessment of crack in corrosion defects in natural gas transmission pipelines, International Pipeline Conference September 2008, IPC 2008.
7. Cronin D., Pick R. Prediction of the failure pressure of complex corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2002, 79:279-287.
8. Mok D., Pick R., Glover A., Hoff R. Bursting of line pipe with long external corrosion. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 1991, 46:195-215.
9. Chouchaoui B., Pick R., Yost D. Burst pressure predictions of line pipe containing single corrosion pits using the finite element method 1992, vol. V-A. OMAE, p. 203-10.
10. Fu B., Kirkwood M. Determination of failure pressure of corroded line pipes using the nonlinear finite element method 1995, vol. II. Pipeline Technology Conference, Belgium, p. 1-9.
11. Stephens D., Leis B., Rudland D. Influence of mechanical properties and irregular geometry on pipeline corrosion defect behavior 1997.
12. Klever F., Stewart G., Clemens A., Valk V. New developments in burst strength predictions for locally corroded pipelines 1995, vol. V. OMAE, p. 161-73.
13. Popelar C. A plane strain analysis model for corroded pipelines 1993, vol. V. OMAE, p. 281-88.
14. Dowling N. Mechanical behavior of materials 2007, Pearson Education. 3rd ed.
15. European SINTAP Procedure Fitness-for-service fracture assessment of structures containing cracks 2007.
16. Jaske C., Beavers J. Fitness-for-service evaluation of pipelines with stress-corrosion cracks or local corrosion October 1999, The International Conference on Advances in Welding Technology (ICAWT).
17. Hosseini A., Cronin D.S., Plumtree A. Experimental testing and evaluation of crack-like defects in line pipe 2010, IPC, Calgary, Alberta.
18. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards, ASTM E8, 2008.
19. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards, ASTM E23, 2008.
20. Tyson W. Assessment of Crack Defects, Banff Pipeline Workshop, 2005.
21. Mak D., Tyson W. Material assessment of Canadian SAW line-pipes 1998, IPC, p. 711-21.
22. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards, ASTM E1820, 2008.
23. BMT Fleet Technology, , July 2010. http://www.fleetech.com.