Effects of Exogenous proline and trehalose on physiological responses in rice seedlings during salt-stress and after recovery

Plant, Soil and Environment

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 309-315

  Nounjan, N ^a   Theerakulpisut, P ^a  

^a Khon Kaen University   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Antioxidant enzymes; Hydrogen peroxide; Osmoprotectants; Rice; Salinity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864410395     PISSN: 12141178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/762/2011-pse     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aghdasi M., Schluepmann H., Smeekens S. (2010): Characterization of Arabidopsis seedlings growth and development under trehalose feeding. Journal of Cell and Molecular Research, 2: 1-9.
2. Ahmed C.B., Rouina B.B., Sensoy S., Boukhriss M., Abdullah F.B. (2010): Exogenous proline effects on photosynthetic performance and antioxidant defense system of young olive tree. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58: 4216-4222.
3. Ali Q., Ashraf M. (2011): Induction of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) due to exogenous application of trehalose: growth, photosynthesis, water relations and oxidative defence mechanism. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 197: 258-271.
4. Beauchamp C., Fridovich I. (1971): Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 44: 276-287.
5. Bradford M.A. (1976): Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72: 248-254.
6. Demiral T., Türkan I. (2005): Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 53: 247-257.
7. Dhindsa R.S., Plumb-Dhindsa P., Thorpe T.A. (1981): Leaf senescence: correlation with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32: 93-101.
8. Dionisio-Sese M.L., Tobita S. (1998): Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Science, 135: 1-9.
9. Djilianov D., Georgieva T., Moyankova D., Atanassov A., Shinozaki K., Smeeken S.C.M., Verma D.P.S., Murata N. (2005): Improved abiotic stress tolerance in plant by accumulation of osmoprotectants gene transfer approach. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 19: 63-71.
10. Garcia A.B., Engler J.A., Iyer S., Cerats T., Montagu M.V., Caplan A.B. (1997): Effects of osmoprotectants upon NaCl stress in rice. Plant Physiology, 11: 159-169.
11. Garg A.K., Kim J.K., Owens T.G., Ranwala A.P., Choi Y.D., Kochian L.V., Wu R.J. (2002): Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99: 15898-15903.
12. Heuer B. (2003): Influence of exogenous application of proline and glycinebetaine on growth of salt-stressed tomato plants. Plant Science, 165: 693-699.
13. Hossain M.A., Fujita M. (2010): Evidence for a role of exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems in mung bean seedlings under salt stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 16: 19-29.
14. Huang Y., Bie Z., Liu Z., Ai Z., Wang W. (2009): Protective role of proline against salt stress is partially related to the improvement of water status and peroxidase enzyme activity in cucumber. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 55: 698-704.
15. Iordachescu M., Imai R. (2008): Trehalose biosynthesis in response to abiotic stresses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50: 1223-1229.
16. Khan M.H., Panda S.K. (2008): Alterations in root lipid peroxidation and antioxidative responses in two rice cultivars under NaCl-salinity stress. Acta Physiologia Plantarum, 30: 81-89.
17. Lee D.H., Kim Y.S., Lee C.B. (2001): The inductive responses of the antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in the rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Physiology, 158: 737-745.
18. Mani S., Van de Cotte B., Van Montagu M., Verbruggen N. (2002): Altered levels of proline dehydrogenase cause hypersensitivity to proline and its analogs in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 128: 73-83.
19. Nakano Y., Asada K. (1980): Spinach chloroplasts scavenge hydrogen peroxide on illumination. Plant and Cell Physiology, 21: 1295-1307.
20. Ozden M., Demirel U., Kahraman A. (2009): Effects of proline on antioxidant system in leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) exposed to oxidative stress by H2O2. Scientia Horticulturae, 119: 163-168.
21. Parvaiz A., Satyawati S. (2008): Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants - a review. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54: 89-99.
22. Sairam R.K., Tyagi A. (2004): Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current Science, 86: 407-421.
23. Schluepmann H., Dijken A.V., Aghdasi M., Wobbes B., Paul M., Smeekens S. (2004): Trehalose mediated growth inhibition of Arabidopsis seedlings is due to trehalose-6-phosphate accumulation. Plant Physiology, 135: 879-890.
24. Shevyakova N.I., Bakulina E.A., Kuznetsov V.I. (2009): Proline antioxidant role in the common ice plant subjected to salinity and paraquat treatment inducing oxidative stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 56: 663-669.
25. Vaidyanathan H., Sivakumar P., Chakrabarty R., Thomas G. (2003): Scavenging of reactive oxygen species in NaCl-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) differential response in salt-tolerant and sensitive varieties. Plant Science, 165: 1411-1418.
26. Velikova V., Yordanov I., Edreva A. (2000): Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective roles of exogenous polyamines. Plant Science, 151: 59-66.
27. Yoshida S., Forno D.A., Cock J.H., Gomez K.A. (1976): Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Bafios.
28. Zeid I.M. (2009): Trehalose as osmoprotectant for maize under salinity-induced stress. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5: 613-622.