US payer perspectives on evidence for formulary decision making

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 18, Issue SPECIAL ISSUE, 2012, Pages

  Wang, Anthony ^a   Halbert, Ronald J ^a   Baerwaldt, Tiffany ^a   Nordyke, Robert J ^a  

^a PriceSpective   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; SATISFACTION; UNITED STATES;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FORMULARIES AS TOPIC; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH, REIMBURSEMENT; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PERCEPTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84864406745     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. National health expenditure projections 2010-2020. http://www.cms.gov/ NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/proj2010.pdf
2. Schoen C, Guterman S, Shih A, et al: Bending the curve: Options for achieving savings and improving value in U.S. health spending. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr-doc/Schoen-bendingthecurve-1080.pdf
3. US Census Bureau: Health insurance highlights 2009. http://www.census. gov/hhes/www/hlthins/data/incpovhlth/2009/highlights.html
4. Eichler HG, Bloechl-Daum B, Abadie E, et al: Relative efficacy of drugs: An emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payers. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:277-291, 2010
5. Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, et al: How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff (Millwood) 29:1834-1841, 2010
6. Bridges JF, Buttorff C: What outcomes should US policy makers compare in comparative effectiveness research? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 10:217-220, 2010
7. Brookings Institution: Implementing comparative effectiveness research: Priorities, methods, and impact. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/events/ 2009/0609-health-care-cer/0609-health-care-cer.pdf
8. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Pub L No. 111-148 §4205, 124 stat 573, 2010
9. Hinkel J: "Cancer is now on the table": Conversations with managed care executives. http://www.nccn.org/about/news/ebulletin/2009-06-09/ table.asp
10. Danielson E, Demartino J, Mullen JA: Managed care and medical oncology: The focus is on value. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:S28-S37, 2010 (suppl 7)
11. Ommaya AK, Kupersmith J: Challenges facing the US patient-centered outcomes research institute. JAMA 306:756-757, 2011
12. Krumholz HM: Real-world imperative of outcomes research. JAMA 306:754-755, 2011
13. Navathe AS, Conway PH: Optimizing health information technology's role in enabling comparative effectiveness research. Am J Manag Care 16:SP44-SP47, 2010 (suppl 12)
14. Behrman RE, Benner JS, Brown JS, et al: Developing the Sentinel System: A national resource for evidence development. N Engl J Med 364:498-499, 2011
15. Health Strategies Group: Strategic accounts: Portraits of leading health plans. http://www.healthstrategies.net/download.cfm?d=5876