Electrode and brain modeling in stereo-EEG

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 123, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1745-1754

  von Ellenrieder, Nicolás ^a,b   Beltrachini, Leandro ^a,b   Muravchik, Carlos H ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c Universidad Provincial del Sudoeste   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Brain anisotropy; Depth electrode; Forward problem; Inverse problem; Stereo EEG

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; GRAY MATTER; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84864401585     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A. Handbook of mathematical functions 1970, Dover, New York.
2. Acar ZA, Makeig S, Worrell G. Head modeling and cortical source localization in epilepsy. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2008. p. 3763-6.
3. Bechtereva N., Abdullaev Y. Depth electrodes in clinical neurophysiology: neuronal activity and human cognitive function. Int J Psychophysiol 2000, 37:11-29.
4. Benbadis S.R., Wyllie E., Bingaman W. Intracranial EEG and localization studies. The treatment of epilepsy: principles and practice 2005, 1059-1067. Lippincott, Philadelphia. E. Wyllie, G.D. Cascino, B.E. Gidal, H.P. Goodkin (Eds.).
5. Blount J.P., Cormier J., Kim H., Kankirawatana P., Riley K.O., Knowlton R.C. Advances in intracranial monitoring. Neurosurg Focus 2008, 25:E18.
6. Brebbia C.A., Dominguez J. Boundary elements. An introductory course 1992, Computational Mechanics Publications. McGraw-Hill. 2nd ed.
7. Cabral B, Leedom L. Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1993 conference; 1993. p. 263-72.
8. Chang N., Gulrajani R., Gotman J. Dipole localization using simulated intracerebral EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:2707-2716.
9. Châtillon C.E., Zelmann R., Bortel A., Avoli M., Gotman J. Contact size does not affect high frequency oscillation detection in intracerebral EEG recordings in a rat epilepsy model. Clin Neurophysiol 2011, 122:1701-1705.
10. Cheng K.S., Isaacson D., Newell J., Gisser D. Electrode models for electric current computed tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989, 36:918-924.
11. Cho J.H., Hong S.B., Jung Y.J., Kang H.C., Kim H.D., Suh M., et al. Evaluation of algorithms for intracranial EEG (iEEG) source imaging of extended sources: feasibility of using iEEG source imaging for localizing epileptogenic zones in secondary generalized epilepsy. Brain Topogr 2011, 24:91-104.
12. Dannhauer M., Lanfer B., Wolters C., Knosche T. Modeling of the human skull in EEG source analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2011, 32:1383-1399.
13. Dümpelmann M., Fell J., Wellmer J., Urbach H., Elger C.E. 3D source localization derived from subdural strip and grid electrodes: a simulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1061-1069.
14. von Ellenrieder N., Valdés-Hernández P., Muravchik C. On the EEG/MEG forward problem solution for distributed cortical sources. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:1083-1091.
15. Engel A.K., Moll C.K.E., Fried I., Ojemann G.A. Invasive recordings from the human brain: clinical insights and beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6:35-47.
16. Fang Q, Boas D. Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and gray-scale images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging; 2009. p. 1142-5.
17. Ferguson A.S., Zhang X., Stroink G. A complete linear discretization for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994, 41:455-460.
18. Geselowitz D.B. On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogenous volume conductor. Biophys J 1967, 7:1-11.
19. Halgren E., Baudena P., Heit G., Clarke M., Marinkovic K. Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. 1. Depth recorded potentials in the human occipital and parietal lobes. J Physiol Paris 1994, 88:1-50.
20. Jenkinson M, Pechaud M, Smith S. BET2: MR-based estimation of brain, skull and scalp surfaces. In: Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping; 2005.
21. Jerbi K., Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Nolte G., Garnero L., Leahy R.M. Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles. Neuroimage 2004, 22:779-793.
22. Jerbi K., Ossandón T., Hamamé C.M., Senova S., Dalal S.S., Jung J., et al. Task-related gamma-band dynamics from an intracerebral perspective: Review and implications for surface EEG and MEG. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:1758-1771.
23. Juergens E., Guettler A., Eckhorn R. Visual stimulation elicits locked and induced gamma oscillations in monkey intracortical- and EEG-potentials, but not in human EEG. Exp Brain Res 1999, 129:247-259.
24. Kay S.M. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Signal processing series 1993, Prentice-Hall.
25. Kobayashi K., Yoshinaga H., Ohtsuka Y., Gotman J. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading. Epilepsia 2005, 46:397-408.
26. Lachaux J., Rudrauf D., Kahane P. Intracranial EEG and human brain mapping. J Physiol Paris 2003, 97:613-628.
27. Litvak V., Eusebio A., Jha A., Oostenveld R., Barnes G.R., Penny W.D., et al. Optimized beamforming for simultaneous MEG and intracranial local field potential recordings in deep brain stimulation patients. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1578-1588.
28. Logothetis N.K. The underpinnings of the bold functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J Neurosci 2003, 23:3963-3971.
29. Mazziotta J., Toga A., Evans A., Fox P., Lancaster J., Zilles K., et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International consortium for brain mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001, 356:1293-1322.
30. Meijs J.W.H., Weier O.W., Peters M.J., van Oosterom A. On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989, 36:1038-1049.
31. Merlet I., Gotman J. Reliability of dipole models of epileptic spikes. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1013-1028.
32. Mitzdorf U. Properties of the evoked-potential generators - current source-density analysis of visually eoked-potentials in the cat cortex. Int J Neurosci 1987, 33:33-59.
33. Mori S., Oishi K., Jiang H., Jiang L., Li X., Akhter K., et al. Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 2008, 40:570-582.
34. de Munck J.C. A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992, 39:986-990.
35. de Munck J.C., van Dijk B.W., Spekreijse H. Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988, 35:960-966.
36. Ollikainen J., Vauhkonen M., Karjalainen P.A., Kaipio J.P. Effects of electrode properties on EEG measurements and a related inverse problem. Med Eng Phys 2000, 22:535-545.
37. Paulson K., Breckon W., Pidcock M. Electrode modelling in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J Appl Math 1992, 52:1012-1022.
38. Shenoy P., Miller K., Ojemann J., Rao R. Generalized features for electrocorticographic BCIs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008, 55:273-280.
39. Somersalo E., Cheney M., Isaacson D. Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography. SIAM J Appl Math 1992, 52:1023-1040.
40. Tuch D., Wedeen V., Dale A., George J., Belliveau J. Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:11697-11701.
41. Wendel K, GN. N, Hannula M, Hyttinen J, Malmivuo J. The influence of electrode size on EEG lead field sensitivity distributions. In: International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism. Special Issue on Recent Trends in Bioelectromagnetism. 6th International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism, vol. 9. Aizu-Wakamatsu City, Fukushima, Japan; 2007. p. 116-7.
42. Wendel K, Suominen K, Kauppinen P, Sonkajarvi E, Tanskanen J, Kamata K, et al. Recording cortical EEG subcortically - improved EEG monitoring from depth-stimulation electrodes. In: Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart 2011, 8th International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism (NFSI ICBEM); 2011. p. 126-30.
43. Wennberg R. On electrical potentials observed at a distance from intracranial electrode contacts. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:259-262.
44. Wennberg R.A., Lozano A.M. Intracranial volume conduction of cortical spikes and sleep potentials recorded with deep brain stimulating electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:1403-1418.
45. Wolters C.H., Anwander A., Tricoche X., Weinstein D., Koch M.A., MacLeod R.S. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling. Neuroimage 2006, 30:813-826.
46. Zaveri H.P., Duckrow R.B., Spencer S.S. Concerning the observation of an electrical potential at a distance from an intracranial electrode contact. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1873-1875.
47. Zhang Y., Ding L., Van Drongelen W., Hecox K., Frim D.M., He B. A cortical potential imaging study from simultaneous extra- and intracranial electrical recordings by means of the finite element method. Neuroimage 2006, 31:1513-1524.
48. Zhang Y., Van Drongelen W., Kohrman M., He B. Three-dimensional brain current source reconstruction from intra-cranial ECoG recordings. Neuroimage 2008, 42:683-695.