Guest editorial: Five steps towards exploring the future of operations management

Operations Management Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 37-42

  Holmström, Jan ^a   Romme, A Georges L ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design principles; Exploration; OM Practice; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864396921     PISSN: 19369735     EISSN: 19369743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12063-011-0060-8     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. Arthur WB (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. Penguin, London, UK.
2. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules, 1: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
3. Basalla G (1988) The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Birkinshaw J, Hamel G, Mol MJ (2008) Management innovation. Acad Manag Rev 33: 825-845.
5. Davenport TH, Short JE (1990) The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. MIT Sloan Management Review 31: 11-27.
6. De Kok T, Janssen F, van Doremalen J, van Wachem E, Clerkx M, Peeters W (2005) Philips Electronics synchronizes its supply chain to end the bullwhip effect. Interfaces 35(1): 37-48.
7. Denyer D, Tranfield D, van Aken JE (2008) Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organ Stud 29: 393-413.
8. Guide D, van Wassenhove L (2007) Dancing with the devil: partnering with industry but publishing in academia. Decis Sci 38: 531-546.
9. Hayes RH, Pisano GP, Upton DM, Wheelwright SC (2005) Operations, Strategy, and Technology: Pursuing the Competitive Edge. Wiley, New York.
10. Holmström J, Ketokivi M, Hameri AP (2009) Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decis Sci 40: 65-87.
11. Holmström J, Partanen J, Tuomi J, Walter M (2010a) Rapid manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. J Manuf Technol Manag 21: 687-697.
12. Holmström J, Främling K, Ala-Risku T (2010b) The uses of tracking in operations management: synthesis of a research program. Int J Prod Econ 126: 267-275.
13. Holmström J, Tenhiälä A, Kärkkäinen M (2011) Item dwell time in project inventories: a field experiment. Comput Ind 62: 99-106.
14. Kelly K (2010) What Technology Wants. Viking, New York.
15. Kranenburg AA, van Houtum GJ (2009) A new partial pooling structure for spare parts networks. Eur J Oper Res 199: 908-921.
16. Magee JF (1958) Production Planning and Inventory Control. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2nd edition.
17. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2: 71-87.
18. Meredith JR, McMullen PR (2008) Editorial: introducing Operations Management Research: advancing practice through theory. Oper Manag Res 1: 1-5.
19. Meyer G, Främling K, Holmström J (2009) Intelligent products: a survey. Comput Ind 60: 137-148.
20. Mohrman SA, Gibson CB, Mohrman AMJ (2001) Doing research that is useful to practice: A model and empirical exploration. Acad Manag J 44: 357-375.
21. Romme AGL (2003) Making a difference: organization as design. Organ Sci 14: 558-573.
22. Romme AGL, Endenburg G (2006) Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organ Sci 17: 287-29.
23. van Aken JE (2004) Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J Manag Stud 41: 219-246.
24. von Hippel E (2011) The Paradigm Shift from Producer to User and Open Innovation, Plenary speech, Decision Sciences Institute 42nd Annual Meeting, Boston November 19-22 2011.
25. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The Machine that Changed the World. Harper-Perennial, New York.
26. Worren NA, Moore K, Elliott R (2002) When theories become tools: Toward a framework for pragmatic validity. Human Relations 55: 1227-1250.