Reply to comment from W.P. Aspinall on "Social studies of volcanology: Knowledge generation and expert advice on active volcanoes" by Amy Donovan, Clive Oppenheimer and Michael Bravo [Bull Volcanol (2012) 74:677-689]

Bulletin of Volcanology

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1571-1574

  Donovan, Amy ^a,b   Oppenheimer, Clive ^a,c,d   Bravo, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c Le Studium   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRISIS MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; VOLCANOLOGY;

EID: 84864389606     PISSN: 02588900     EISSN: 14320819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-012-0626-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aspinall WP (2006) Structured elicitation of expert judgement for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment in volcanic eruptions. In: Mader HM, Coles SG, Connor C, Connor L (eds) Statistics in volcanology. Geological Society of London, London, pp 15-30.
2. Aspinall WP (2010) A route to more tractable expert advice. Nature 463: 294-295.
3. Aspinall WP (2012) Comment on Donovan et al. 2012 "Social studies of volcanology: expert advice and knowledge generation on active volcanoes". Bull Volcanol. this issue.
4. De Finetti B (1974) Theory of probability. Wiley, London.
5. Donovan A, Oppenheimer C, Bravo M (2012) Social studies of volcanology: knowledge generation and expert advice on active volcanoes. Bull Volcanol 74(3): 677-689.
6. Gillies D (2000) Philosophical theories of probability. Routledge, London.
7. Hacking I (2001) An introduction to probability and inductive logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Hacking I (2006) (Second edition; first published 1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Kant I (2003) (Original 1781) Critique of pure reason (trans: Meikljohn JMD). Dover, New York.
10. Kuhn T (1977) Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In: Kuhn T (ed) The essential tension: studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 320-329.
11. Kynn M (2008) The 'heuristics and biases' bias in expert elicitation. J R Stat Soc: Ser A (Stat Soc) 171(1): 239-264.
12. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
13. Marzocchi W, Zechar JD (2011) Earthquake forecasting and earthquake prediction: different approaches for obtaining the best model. Seismol Res Lett 82(3): 442-448.
14. O'Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, Eiser JR, Garthwaite P (2006) Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts' probabilities. Wiley, London.
15. Popper K (1959) (German original, 1935). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, Abingdon.
16. Popper K (1983) Realism and the aim of science. Routledge, London.
17. Russell B (1912) (reissued 2001). The problems of philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Spiegelhalter DJ, Riesch H (2011) Don't know, can't know: embracing deeper uncertainties when analysing risks. Philos Trans R Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 369(1956): 4730-4750.
19. Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. EMBO Rep 8(4): 309-315.
20. Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2(2): 111-127.