A spatio-temporal solution for the EEG/MEG inverse problem using group penalization methods

Statistics and its Interface

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 521-534

  Tian, Tian Siva ^a   Li, Zhimin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Eeg meg; Group elastic net; Inverse problem; Spatio temporal data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864386151     PISSN: 19387989     EISSN: 19387997     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4310/sii.2011.v4.n4.a10     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Auranen, T., Nummenmaa, A., Hämäläinen, M. S., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Lampinen, J., Vehtari, A. and Sams, M. (2005). Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with lpnorm priors. NeuroImage 26(3) 870-884.
2. Baillet, S. and Garnero, L. (1997). A bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional prior in the eeg/meg inverse problem. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 44(5) 374-385.
3. Baillet, S., Mosher, J. and Leahy, R. (2001). Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 18(6) 14-30.
4. Barlow, H. B. (1994). What is the computational goal of the neocortex? In Koch, C. and Davis, J. L. (eds.), Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, pp. 1-22. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
5. Bijma, F., de Munck, J. and Heethaar, R. (2005). The spatiotemporal meg covariance matrix modeled as a sum of kronecker products. NeuroImage 27 402-415.
6. Bolstad, A., Veen, B. V. and Nowak, R. (2009). Space-time event sparse penalization for magneto-/electroencephalography. Neuro-Image 46(4) 1066-1081.
7. Dale, A. M. and Sereno, M. I. (1993). Improved localization of cortical activity by combining eeg and meg with mri cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 162-176.
8. Daunizeau, J., Mattout, J., Clonda, D., Goulard, B., Benali, H. and Lina, J.M. (2006). Bayesian spatio-temporal approach for eeg source reconstruction: Conciliating ecd and distributed models. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 53(3) 503-516.
9. Dogandžić, A. and Nehorai, A. (2000). Estimating evoked dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with eeg/meg arrays. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 48(1) 13-25.
10. Friston, K., Harrison, L., Daunizeau, J., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Henson, R., Flandin, G. and Mattout, J. (2008). Multiple sparse priors for the m/eeg inverse problem. NeuroImage 39(3) 1104-1120.
11. Gorodnitsky, I. F. and Rao, B. D. (1997). Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: A re-weighted minimum norm algorithm. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 45(3) 600-616.
12. Grave de Peralta Menendez, R. and Gonzalez Andino, S. (1998). A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 45 440-448.
13. Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J. and Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993, Apr). Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics 65(2) 413-497.
14. Hämäläinen, M. and Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994). Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distribution. Technical report, Helsinki University of Technology. TKK-F-A599.
15. Haufe, S., Tomioka, R., Dickhaus, T., Sannelli, C., Blankertz, B., Nolte, G., and Müller, K. R. (2011, Apr). Largescale eeg/meg source localization with spatial flexibility. Neuro-Image 54(2) 851-859.
16. Huizenga, H., de Munck, J., Waldorp, L. and Grasman, R. (2002). Spatiotemporal eeg/meg source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 49 533-539.
17. Iwaki, S. and Ueno, S. (1998). Weighted minimum-norm source estimation of magnetoencephalography utilizing the temporal information of the measured data. Journal of Applied Physics 83(11) 6441-6443.
18. Jeffs, B., Leahy, R. and Singh, M. (1987). An evaluation of methods for neuromagnetic image reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 34 713-723.
19. Jun, S. C., George, J. S., Paŕe-Blagoev, J., Plis, S. M., Ranken, D. M., Schmidt, D. M. and Wood, C. C. (2005). Spatiotemporal bayesian inference dipole analysis for meg neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 29(1) 84-98.
20. Lin, F.-H., Belliveau, J. W., Dale, A. M. and Hämäläinen, M. S. (2006). Distributed current estimates using cortical orientation constraints. Human Brain Mapping 27 1-13.
21. Matsuura, K. and Okabe, Y. (1995). Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 42 608-615.
22. Mosher, J., Lewis, P. and Leahy, R. (1992). Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal meg data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 39(6) 541-557.
23. Mosher, J. C., Leahy, R. M. and Lewis, P. S. (1999). Eeg and meg: Forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 46(3) 245-259.
24. Nummenmaa, A., Auranen, T., Hämäläinen, M. S., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Lampinen, J., Sams, M. and Vehtari, A. (2007). Hierarchical bayesian estimates of distributed meg sources: Theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and mcmc methods. Neuro-Image 35(2) 669-685.
25. Nummenmaa, A., Auranen, T., Vanni, S., Hämäläinen, M. S., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Lampinen, J., Vehtari, A. and Sams, M. (2007). Sparse meg inverse solutions via hierarchical bayesian modeling: Evaluation with a parallel fmri study. Technical report, Helsinki, Finland. Report B65.
26. Nunez, P. (1981). Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
27. Opitz, D. and Maclin, R. (1999). Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 169-198.
28. Ou, W., Hämäläinen, M. and Golland, P. (2009). A distributed spatio-temporal eeg/meg inverse solver. NeuroImage 44(3) 932-946.
29. Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M, and Lehmann, D (1994). Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology 18 49-65.
30. Rao, B. D. and Kreutz-Delgado, K. (1999). An affine scaling methodology for best basis selection. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 47(1) 187-200.
31. Sarvas, J. (1987). Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Physics in Medicine and Biology 32(1) 11-22.
32. Sato, M., Yoshioka, T., Kajihara, S., Toyama, K., Goda, N., Doya, K. and Kawato, M. (2004). Hierarchical bayesian estimation for meg inverse problem. NeuroImage 23(3) 806-826.
33. Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. (1986). Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 65 344-360.
34. Sorrentino, A., Parkkonen, L., Pascarella, A., Campi, C. and Piana, M. (2009). Dynamical meg source modeling with multitarget bayesian filtering. Human Brain Mapping 30(6) 1911-1921.
35. Uutela, K., Hämäläinen, M. and Somersalo, E. (1999). Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. NeuroImage 10 173-180.
36. VanVeen, B., van Drongelen, W., Yuchtman, M. and Suzuki, A. (1997). Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 44 867-880.
37. Yamazaki, T., Kamijo, K., Kenmochi, A., Fukuzumi, S., Kiyuna, T., Takaki, Y. and Kuroiwa, Y. (2000). Multiple equivalent current dipole source localization of visual event-related potentials during oddball paradigm with motor response. Brain Topography 12 159-175.
38. Yuan, M. and Lin, Y. (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 68 49-67.
39. Zou, H. and Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 67 301-320.