Bridging Levels of Analysis for Probabilistic Models of Cognition

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 263-268

  Griffiths, Thomas L ^a   Vul, Edward ^b   Sanborn, Adam N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cognitive modeling; levels of analysis; probabilistic models of cognition; rational process models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864381195     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721412447619     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson J.R.The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990:.
2. Ashby F.G.,Alfonso-Reese L.Categorization as probability density estimation.Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1995;39:216-233.
3. Brown S.D.,Steyvers M.Detecting and predicting changes.Cognitive Psychology. 2009;58:49-67.
4. Busemeyer J.R.Decision making under uncertainty: Simple scalability, fixed sample, and sequential sampling models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1985;11:538-564.
5. Fiser J.,Berkes P.,Orban G.,Lengyel M.Statistically optimal perception and learning: From behavior to neural representations.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14:119-130.
6. Gershman S.J.,Vul E.,Tenenbaum J.B.Multistability and perceptual inference.Neural Computation. 2012;24:1-24.
7. Griffiths T.L.,Chater N.,Kemp C.,Perfors A.,Tenenbaum J.B.Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14:357-364.
8. Kersten D.,Mamassian P.,Yuille A.L.Object perception as Bayesian inference.Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55:271-304.
9. Levy R.,Reali F.,Griffiths T.L.Advances in neural information processing systems. Koller D.Schuurmans D.Bengio Y.Bottou L., ed. La Jolla, CA: NIPS Foundation; 2009:937-944.
10. Luce R.Individual choice behavior. New York, NY: Wiley; 1959:.
11. Marr D.Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1982:.
12. McClelland J.L.,Botvinick M.M.,Noelle D.C.,Plaut D.C.,Rogers T.T.,Seidenberg M.S.,Smith L.B.Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to understanding cognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2010;14:348-356.
13. Robert C.,Casella G.Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York, NY: Springer; 2004:.
14. Sanborn A.N.,Griffiths T.L.,Navarro D.J.Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning.Psychological Review. 2010;117:1144-1167.
15. Shi L.,Griffiths T.L.Advances in neural information processing systems. Bengio Y.Schuurmans D.Lafferty J.Williams C.K. I.Culotta A., ed. La Jolla, CA: NIPS Foundation; 2009:1669-1677.
16. Shi L.,Griffiths T.L.,Feldman N.H.,Sanborn A.N.Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2010;17:443-464.
17. Stewart N.,Chater N.,Brown G.D. A.Decision by sampling.Cognitive Psychology. 2006;53:1-26.
18. Trommershäuser J.,Maloney L.T.,Landy M.S.Decision making, movement planning, and statistical decision theory.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2008;12:291-297.
19. Tversky A.,Kahneman D.Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science. 1974;185:1124-1131.
20. Vul E.,Goodman N.,Griffiths T.,Tenenbaum J.Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Taatgen N.van Rijn H., ed. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society; 2009:66-72.
21. Vul E.,Pashler H.Measuring the crowd within: Probabilistic representations within individuals.Psychological Science. 2008;19:645-647.