Differentiating the Scientific Endeavors of Research, Program Evaluation, and Quality Improvement Studies

JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-3

  Lowe, Nancy K ^a   Cook, Paul F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864374980     PISSN: 08842175     EISSN: 15526909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01319.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (8)

1. Bellin, E., & Dubler, N. N. (2001). The quality-improvement-research divide and the need for external oversight. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1512-1517.
2. Chesla, C. A. (2008). Translational research: Essential contributions from interpretive nursing science. Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 381-390. doi:10.1002/nur.20267.
3. Cook, P. F. (2010). Research, program evaluation, or QI? Mapping the edges in adherence studies. Communicating Nursing Research, 43, 1-14.
4. Goldstein, I. L. (1980). Training in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 229-272. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps31.020180.001305.
5. Lynn, J., Baily, M. A., Bottrell, M., Jennings, B., Levine, R. J., Davidoff, F., ... James, B. (2007). The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146, 666-673.
6. Newhouse, R. P., Pettit, J. C., Poe, S., & Rocco, L. (2006). The slippery slope: Differentiating between quality improvement and research. Journal of Nursing Administration, 36, 211-219.
7. Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. 46.102(d) (1991).
8. Wilensky, G. R. (2009). The policies and politics of creating a comparative clinical effectiveness research center. Health Affairs, 28, 719-729. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w719.