What does empirical research contribute to medical ethics? A methodological discussion using exemplary studies

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 425-435

  Reiter Theil, Stella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS;

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS;

EID: 84864370678     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: 14692147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180112000205     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Reiter-Theil S. Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? "The embedded researcher" as a methodological approach. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 2004;7(1):17-29.
2. Førde R. How can empirical ethics improve medical practice? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2012;21(4):517-526.
3. Some authors use the term"EE" with a focus on practical work in clinical ethics, e.g.,Widdershoven G, Abma T, Molewijk B. Empirical ethics as dialogical practice. Bioethics 2009;23(4):236-48.
4. Hope T. Empirical medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1999;25(3):219-20. (Pubitemid 29273769)
5. Sugarman J, Sulmasy DP. The many methods of medical ethics. In: Sugarman J, Sulmasy DP, eds. Methods in Medical Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001:3-18.
6. Solomon M. Realizing bioethics' goals in practice: Ten ways "is" can help "ought." Hastings Center Report 2005;35(4):40-7. (Pubitemid 41411591)
7. Empirical ethics [special issue]. American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9(6-7).
8. Empirical turn [special issue]. Bioethics 2009;23(4).
9. Kon AA. The role of empirical research in bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9(6-7):59-65.
10. Empirical ethics [special issue]. Bioethics 2009;23(4).
11. Molewijk B, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. Empirical data and moral theory: A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 2004;7(1):55-69.
12. As described by De Vries R. How can we help? From "sociology in" to "sociology of" bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2004;32(2):279-92.
13. Mertz M. 2009. Zur Möglichkeit einer evidenzbasierten Klinischen Ethik: Philosophische Untersuchungen zur Verwendung von Empirie und Evidenz in der (Medizin-)Ethik [About the possibility of an evidence-based clinical ethics: Philosophical investigations about the use of the "empirical" and "evidence" in (medical) ethics] [master's thesis]. Munich/Ravensburg: GRIN Verlag.
14. Sugarman J, Kass N, Faden R. Categorizing empirical research in bioethics: Why count the ways? American Journal of Bioethics 2009;9(6-7):66-103.
15. See note 12, Mertz 2009.
16. See note 1.
17. Research on clinical ethics and consultation [thematic section]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2008;11(1).
18. Pfaefflin M, Kobert K, Reiter-Theil S. Evaluating clinical ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2009;18(4):406-19.
19. Hentschel R, Lindner K, Krüger M, Reiter-Theil S. Restrictions of ongoing intensive care (RIC) in neonates-A prospective study. Pediatrics 2006;118:563-9. (Pubitemid 46085411)
20. Forde R, Hansen TWR. Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: What have we learned? Clinical Ethics 2009;4:125-130.
21. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
22. Dalla-Vorgia P, Mason S, Megone C, Allmark P, Bratlid B, Gill AB, et al. Obtaining informed consent for neonatal research. ADC Fetal & Neonatal Edition 2001;84:F70-F73.
23. Hurst S, Forde R, Reiter-Theil S, Perrier A, Slowther AM, Pegoraro R, et al. Physicians' access to ethics support services in four European countries. Health Care Analysis 2007;15:321-35. (Pubitemid 350045111)
24. Nuckton TJ, List ND. Age as a factor in critical care unit admissions. Archive of Internal Medicine 1995;155:1087-92.
25. Callahan D. Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1987.
26. Callahan D. Aging and the allocation of resources. In: Oberender P, ed. Alter und Gesundheit. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 1996:83-92.
27. The principle follows the tradition of Kant and is often attributed to Hans Albert: Albert H. Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1985. After initial skeptical reactions, the National Medical Academy put the topic on its agenda.
28. Winkler E, Reiter-Theil S, Lange-Rieß D, Schmahl-Menges N, Hiddemann W. Patient involvement in decisions to limit treatment: The crucial role of agreement between physician and patient. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27(13):2225-30.
29. Charles CA, Gafni A, Whelan T,Willan A, Farrell S. Shared decision making: What does it mean to physicians? Journal of Clinical Oncology 2003;21:932-6. (Pubitemid 46606455)
30. Charles CA, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine 1999;49:651-61. (Pubitemid 29314682)
31. "Dialectic," according to Hegel, refers to the necessary process that makes up progress in both thought and the world. The process is one of overcoming the contradiction between thesis and antithesis, by means of synthesis; the synthesis in turn becomes contradicted, and the process continues (after Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996). Regulative idea, after Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, see note 31.
32. Reidun Førde has pointed out this analogy, which deserves more exploration from both epistemological and ethical perspectives.
33. Reiter-Theil S, Agich GJ. Research on clinical ethics and consultation: Introduction to the thematic section. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2008;11(1):3-5.
34. METAP is an evidence-oriented guideline providing knowledge and procedures for clinical ethics support; the acronym stands for modular, ethical treatment decisions, allocation of resources at the micro level, and process.
35. Reiter-Theil S, Mertz M, Schürmann J, Stingelin Giles N, Meyer-Zehnder B. Evidence - competence - discourse: The theoretical framework of the multi-centre clinical ethics support project METAP. Bioethics 2011;25(7):403-12.