The impact of magnetostriction on the transduction of normal bias field EMATs

NDT and E International

Volumn 51, Issue , 2012, Pages 8-15

  Ribichini, R ^a   Nagy, P B ^a,b   Ogi, H ^c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Cincinnati   (United States)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers; Lorentz force; Magnetostrction; Steel

Indexed keywords

BIAS FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC ACOUSTIC TRANSDUCERS; FERROMAGNETIC STEEL; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; LORENTZ EFFECTS; MAGNETOSTRCTION; MECHANICAL BOUNDARIES; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; STEEL GRADES; TRANSDUCTION MECHANISM;

ACOUSTIC TRANSDUCERS; BACTERIOPHAGES; LORENTZ FORCE; MAGNETOSTRICTION; STEEL;

MAGNETOSTRICTIVE DEVICES;

EID: 84864369462     PISSN: 09638695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R.B. Thompson Generation of horizontally polarized shear waves in ferromagnetic materials using magnetostrictively coupled meander-coil electromagnetic transducers Appl Phys Lett 34 1979 175 177
2. Hegeon Kwun, and Cecil M. Teller Magnetostrictive generation and detection of longitudinal, torsional, and flexural waves in a steel rod J Acoust Soc Am 96 1994 1202 1204
3. E.R. Dobbs Electromagnetic generation of ultrasonic waves W.P. Mason, R.N. Thurston, Physical acoustics vol. X 1973 Academic Press New York 127 189
4. B.W. Maxfield, and C.M. Fortunko The design and use of electromagnetic acoustic wave transducers (EMATs) Mater Eval 41 1983 1399 1408
5. R.B. Thompson Physical principles of measurements with EMAT transducers W.P. Mason, R.N. Thurston, Physical acoustics vol. XIX 1990 Academic Press New York 157 200
6. K. Kawashima Theory and numerical calculation of the acoustic field produced in metal by an electromagnetic ultrasonic transducer J Acoust Soc Am 60 1976 1089 1099
7. P.D. Wilcox, M.J. Lowe, and P. Cawley The excitation and detection of lamb waves with planar coil electromagnetic acoustic transducers IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 52 12 2005 2370 2383
8. A. Wilbrand EMUS-probes for bulk waves and rayleigh waves, model for sound field and efficiency calculations P. Holler, New procedures in nondestructive testing 1983 Springer Berlin 71 82
9. A. Wilbrand Quantitative modeling and experimental analysis of the physical properties of electomagnetic-ultrasonic transducers D. Chimenti, D. Thompson, Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation vol. 7 1987 Plenum New York 671 678
10. H. Ogi Field dependence of coupling efficiency between electromagnetic field and ultrasonic bulk waves J Appl Phys 82 1997 3940 3949
11. M. Hirao, and H. Ogi EMATs for science and industry: noncontacting ultrasonic measurements 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston
12. R. Ribichini, F. Cegla, P.B. Nagy, and P. Cawley Quantitative modeling of the transduction of electromagnetic acoustic transducers operating on ferromagnetic media IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 57 12 2010 2808 2817
13. D. Jiles Introduction to magnetism and magnetic materials 1998 Chapman and Hall London
14. G. Engdahl Handbook of giant magnetostrictive materials 2000 Academic Press San Diego
15. E.W. Lee Magnetostriction and magnetomechanical effects Rep Prog Phys 18 1 1955 184 229
16. R.M. Bozorth Ferromagnetism 1951 Van Nostrand Princeton
17. H. Ogi, E. Goda, and M. Hirao Increase of efficiency of magnetostriction sh-wave electromagnetic acoustic transducer by angled bias field: piezomagnetic theory and measurement Jpn J Appl Phys 42 2003 3020 3024
18. J. Qu, and M. Cherkaoui Fundamentals of micromechanics of solids 2006 Wiley Hoboken
19. P. Hammond, and J.K. Sykluski Engineering electromagnetism: physical processes and computation 1994 Oxford Science Publications Oxford
20. E. Weber Electromagnetic fields 1972 J. Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
21. K.R. Demarest Engineering electromagnetics 1998 Prentice-Hall USA
22. R. Ribichini, F. Cegla, P.B. Nagy, and P. Cawley Study and comparison of different EMAT configurations for sh wave inspection IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 58 12 2011 2571 2581
23. Y. Chen, B.K. Kriegermeier-Sutton, J.E. Snyder, K.W. Dennis, R.W. McCallum, and D.C. Jiles Magnetomechanical effects under torsional strain in iron, cobalt and nickel J Magn Magn Mater 236 1-2 2001 131 138
24. Sepandarmaz Momeni, Adalbert Konrad, and Anthony N. Sinclair Determination of reversible permeability in the presence of a strong bias field J Appl Phys 105 2009 103908
25. R.B. Thompson Mechanisms of electromagnetic generation and detection of ultrasonic lamb waves in iron-nickel alloy polycrystals J Appl Phys 48 12 1977 4942 4950
26. steel1018-permag.dat; 2012. 〈 http://www.fieldp.com/ 〉.
27. M.V.K. Chari, and P. Reece Magnetic field distribution in solid metallic structures in the vicinity of current carrying conductors, and associated eddy-current losses IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst PAS-93 1 1974 45 56
28. R. Ribichini, F. Cegla, P.B. Nagy, and P. Cawley Experimental and numerical evaluation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer performance on steel materials NDT & E Int 45 1 2012 32 38
29. C.B. Scruby, and L.E. Drain Laser ultrasonics: techniques and applications 1990 Taylor & Francis
30. S.J. Davies, C. Edwards, G.S. Taylor, and S.B. Palmer Laser-generated ultrasound: its properties, mechanisms and multifarious applications J Phys D Appl Phys 26 1993 329 348