Integration of biomass gasification with a Scandinavian mechanical pulp and paper mill - Consequences for mass and energy balances and global CO2 emissions

Energy

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 420-428

  Isaksson, Johan ^a   Pettersson, Karin ^a   Mahmoudkhani, Maryam ^a   Åsblad, Anders ^a   Berntsson, Thore ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biomass gasification; Biorefinery; Energy efficiency; Process integration; Thermo mechanical pulp and paper mill

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GASIFICATION; MECHANICAL PULP; METHANOL; PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY; PROFITABILITY; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS;

BIOMASS GASIFICATION; BIOREFINERIES; CO-FIRING BIOMASS; CO-LOCATED; COAL POWER PLANTS; DECLINING DEMAND; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; FISCHER TROPSCH; GLOBAL CO; HEAT INTEGRATION; MASS AND ENERGY BALANCE; POSSIBLE FUTURES; PROCESS INTEGRATION; PRODUCT GAS; PULP AND PAPER; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY; PULP AND PAPER MILL; STAND-ALONE OPERATION; THERMO-MECHANICAL; VALUE ADDED PRODUCTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; MASS BALANCE; METHANOL; MILL; PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; EMISSION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; GASIFICATION; MECHANICAL PULPS; METHANOL; PAPER INDUSTRY; PROFITABILITY; PULP INDUSTRY; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING;

SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 84864356769     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 2 emission balances for different black liquor gasification biorefinery concepts for production of electricity or second-generation liquid biofuels. Energy 2010, 35(2):1101-1106.
2. Larson ED, Consonni S, Katofsky RE, Iisa K, Frederick JW. A cost-benefit assessment of gasification-based biorefining in the kraft pulp and paper industry. Main report, vol. 1; 2006.
3. McKeough P, Saviharju K. Enhancing production of energy, power and fuels in conjunction with chemical recovery and simultaneously reducing green-house gas emissions. Conference enhancing production of energy, power and fuels in conjunction with chemical recovery and simultaneously reducing green-house gas emissions, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 2007; p. 385-390.
4. 2 emissions and energy use. Energy 2011, 36(2):932-941.
5. Consonni S., Katofsky R.E., Larson E.D. A gasification-based biorefinery for the pulp and paper industry. Chem Eng Res Design 2009, 87(9):1293-1317.
6. Kemp I. Pinch analysis and process integration: a user guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy 2007, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK. 2nd ed.
7. Smith R. Chemical Process Design and Integration 2005, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
8. Hakala J, Manninen J, Ruohonen P. Generic tool for screening energy saving potential in pulp and paper industry. Conference Generic tool for screening energy saving potential in pulp and paper industry, Prague, Czech Republic; 2008.
9. Michel G. Analysing the potential for steam savings in TMP mills using the HLMPP tool. Master of Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg; 2010.
10. Internal source at a Swedish pulp and paper company; 2011.
11. Harvey S. Performance of a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle CHP plant supplying heat to a district heating network. Conference Performance of a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle CHP plant supplying heat to a district heating network, Munich, Germany; 2000.
12. Aspen Tech Aspen Plus V7.2 2010, Aspen Technology Inc, Houston, Texas. http://www.aspentech.com.
13. Spath P, Aden A, Eggeman T, Ringer M, Wallace B, Jechura J. Biomass to hydrogen production detailed design and economics utilizing the battelle columbus laboratory indirectly-heated gasifier; 2005.
14. Hamelinck C.N., Faaij A.P.C. Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Sources 2001.
15. Larson E.D., Consonni S., Napoletano S., Katofsky R.E., Iisa K., Frederick J.W. A cost-benefit assessment of gasification-based biorefining in the kraft pulp and paper industry. Detailed biorefinery design and performance simulation 2006, vol. 2.
16. Ekbom T., Hjerpe C., Hagström M., Hermann F. Pilot study of Bio-jet A-1 fuel production for Stockholm Arlanda Airport 2009, VÄRMEFORSK Service AB, Stockholm.
17. Hamelinck C.N., Faaij A.P.C., den Uil H., Boerrigter H. Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimization, and development potential. Energy 2004, 29(11):1743-1771.
18. ChemNetBase - Properties of organic compounds. Available at: [accessed 07.03.11]. http://www.chemnetbase.com/tours/poc/intro.jsf.
19. 2 capture. Appl Energy 2012, 92:255-268.
20. Bioenergihandboken 2007, Available at:, [accessed 08.03.11]. http://www.novator.se/bioenergy/facts/fuelinvest.pdf.
21. Näslund M. Vägtransport av lös och buntad grot 2006, SLU, Sollefteå.
22. Axelsson E, Harvey S. Scenarios for assessing profitability and carbon balances of energy investments in industry; 2010.
23. Abu-Zaid M., Badran O., Yamin J. Effect of methanol addition on the performance of spark ignition engines. Energy Fuels 2004, 18(2):312-315.
24. Gode J., Martinsson F., Hagberg L., öman A., Höglund J., Palm D. Miljöfaktaboken 2011 2011, Värmeforsk Service AB, Stockholm.
25. JRC, EUCAR, CONCAWE Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context, version 3c 2011, Available at:. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/22590/2/eur%252024952%2520en%2520n.pdf.
26. Lindholm E.L., Berg S., Hansson P.A. Energy efficiency and the environmental impact of harvesting stumps and logging residues. Eur J For Res 2010, 129:1223-1235.