Using phenx measures to identify opportunities for cross-study analysis

Human Mutation

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 849-857

  Pan, Huaqin ^a   Tryka, Kimberly A ^b   Vreeman, Daniel J ^c,d   Huggins, Wayne ^a   Phillips, Michael J ^a   Mehta, Jayashri P ^b,f   Phillips, Jacqueline H ^c   McDonald, Clement J ^b   Junkins, Heather A ^e   Ramos, Erin M ^e   Hamilton, Carol M ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental exposure; Epidemiologic methods; GWAS; Phenotype

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INTERNET; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NOMENCLATURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PHENOTYPE; SOFTWARE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84864338647     PISSN: 10597794     EISSN: 10981004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22074     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bennett SN, Caporaso N, Fitzpatrick AL, Agrawal A, Barnes K, Boyd HA, Cornelis MC, Hansel NN, Heiss G, Heit JA, Kang JH, Kittner SJ, and others. 2011. Phenotype harmonization and cross-study collaboration in GWAS consortia: the GENEVA experience. Genet Epidemiol 35:159-173.
2. Burton PR, Hansell AL, Fortier I, Manolio TA, Khoury MJ, Little J, Elliott P. 2009. Size matters: just how big is BIG? Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 38:263-273.
3. ca BIG Strategic Planning Workspace. 2007. The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (ca BIG): infrastructure and applications for a worldwide research community. Stud Health Technol Inform 129:330-334.
4. Cornelis MC, Agrawal A, Cole JW, Hansel NN, Barnes KC, Beaty TH, Bennett SN, Bierut LJ, Boerwinkle E, Doheny KF, Feenstra B, Feingold E, and others. 2010. The Gene, Environment Association Studies Consortium (GENEVA): maximizing the knowledge obtained from GWAS by collaboration across studies of multiple conditions. Genet Epidemiol 34:364-372.
5. Fortier I, Burton PR, Robson PJ, Ferretti V, Little J, L'Heureux F, Deschênes M, Knoppers BM, Doiron D, Keers JC, Linksted P, Harris JR, and others. 2010. Quality, quantity and harmony: the Data SHa PER approach to integrating data across bioclinical studies. Int J Epidemiol 39:1383-1393.
6. García-Closas M, Lubin JH. 1999. Power and sample size calculations in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: comments on different approaches. Am J Epidemiol 149:689-692.
7. Gershon RC, Rothrock N, Hanrahan R, Bass M, Cella D. 2010. The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. J Appl Meas 11:304-314.
8. Hamilton, CM, Strader LC, Pratt JG, Maiese D, Hendershot T, Kwok RK, Hammond JA, Huggins W, Jackman D, Pan H, Nettles DS, Beaty TH, and others. 2011. The Phen X Toolkit: get the most from your measures. Am J Epidemiol 174:253-260.
9. Health IT Standards Committee. 2011. Recommendations to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) on the assignment of code sets to clinical concepts [data elements] for use in quality measures. [Letter]. Accessed at: http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_12811_955546_0_0_18/HITSC_CQMWG_VTF_Transmit_090911. pdf.
10. Hendershot TP, Pan H, Haines J, Harlan WR, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Hamilton CM. 2011. Use the Phen X Toolkit to add standard measures to your study. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 71:1.21.1-1.21.18.
11. Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA. 2009. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9362-9367.
12. Kakazu KK, Cheung LW, Lynne W. 2004. The Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (ca BIG): pioneering an expansive network of information and tools for collaborative cancer research. Hawaii Med J 63:273-275.
13. Kho A, Pacheco J, Peissig P, Rasmussen L, Newton K, Weston N, Crane P, Pathak J, Chute C, Bielinski S, Kullo I, Li R, Manolio T, Chisholm R, Denny J. 2011. Electronic medical records for genetic research: results of the e MERGE Consortium. Sci Transl Med 3:79re1.
14. Khoury MJ, Bertram L, Boffetta P, Butterworth AS, Chanock SJ, Dolan SM, Fortier I, Garcia-Closas M, Gwinn M, Higgins JP, Janssens AC, Ostell J, and others. 2009. Genome-wide association studies, field synopses, and the development of the knowledge base on genetic variation and human diseases. Am J Epidemiol 170:269-279.
15. Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, Kimura M, Tryka K, Bagoutdinov R, Hao L, Kiang A, Paschall J, Phan L, Popova N, Pretel S, and others. 2007. The NCBI db Ga P database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat Genet 39:1181-1186.
16. Manolio TA. 2009. Collaborative genome-wide association studies of diverse diseases: programs of the NHGRI's office of population genomics. Pharmacogenomics 10:235-241.
17. Mc Carty C, Chisholm R, Chute C, Kullo I, Jarvik G, Larson E, Li R, Masys D, Ritchie M, Roden D, Struewing J, Wolf W, e MERGE Team. 2011. The e MERGE network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies. BMC Med Genomics 4:13.
18. Mc Donald CJ, Huff SM, Mercer K, Hernandez J, Vreeman DJ, editors. 2011. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC R ) users' guide. Indianapolis, Indiana: Regenstrief Institute.
19. Mc Donald CJ, Huff SM, Suico JG, Hill G, Leavelle D, Aller R, Forrey A, Mercer K, De Moor G, Hook J, Williams W, Case J, Maloney P. 2003. LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update. Clin Chem 49:624-633.
20. Peissig PL, Rasmussen LV, Berg RL, Linneman JG, Mc Carty CA, Waudby C, Chen L, Denny JC, Wilke RA, Pathak J, Carrell D, Kho AN, Starren JB. 2012. Importance of multi-modal approaches to effectively identify cataract cases from electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 19:225-234.
21. Riley WT, Pilkonis P, Cella D. 2011. Application of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to mental health research. J Ment Health Policy Econ 14:201-208.
22. Thorisson GA, Muilu J, Brookes AJ. 2009. Genotype-phenotype databases: challenges and solutions for the post-genomic era. Nat Rev Genet 10:9-18.
23. Vreeman DJ, Mc Donald CJ, Huff SM. 2010a. LOINC R: a universal catalogue of individual clinical observations and uniformrepresentation of enumerated collections. Int J Funct Inf Pers Med 3:273-291.
24. Vreeman DJ, Mc Donald CJ, Huff SM. 2010b. Representing patient assessments in LOINC R. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010:832-836.