Investigating species-environment relationships at multiple scales: Differentiating between intrinsic scale and the modifiable areal unit problem

Ecological Complexity

Volumn 11, Issue , 2012, Pages 91-102

  Lechner, Alex M ^a,b   Langford, William T ^b   Jones, Simon D ^b   Bekessy, Sarah A ^b   Gordon, Ascelin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Modifiable areal unit problem; Multi scale; Remote sensing; Simulation modelling; Spatial resolution; Spatial uncertainty; Species environment relationships; Virtual ecologist

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864323156     PISSN: 1476945X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adams J.B., Gillespie A.R. Remote Sensing of Landscapes with Spectral Images. A Physical Modeling Approach 2006, Cambridge University Press, NY.
2. Addicott J.F., Aho J.M., Antolin M.F., Padilla D.K., Richardson J.S., Soluk D.A. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 1987, 49:340-346.
3. Antrop M. Reflecting upon 25 years of landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:1441-1443.
4. Atkinson P.M. Resolution manipulation and sub-pixel mapping. Remote Sensing Data Analysis: Including the Spatial Domain 2004, 51-70. Springer, Netherlands. S.M. De Jong, F.D. Van der Meer (Eds.).
5. Austin M.P., Belbin L., Meyers J.A., Doherty M.D., Luoto M. Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions. Role of artificial data and theory. Ecological Modelling 2006, 199:197-216.
6. Buyantuyev A., Wu J.G. Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:7-13.
7. Chapman A., Muñoz M., Koch I. Environmental information: placing biodiversity phenomena in an ecological and environmental context. Biodiversity Informatics 2005, 2:24-41.
8. Colson F., Bogaert J., Filho A.C., Nelson B., Pinagé E.R., Ceulemans R. The influence of forest definition on landscape fragmentation assessment in Rondônia, Brazil. Ecological Indicators 2009, 9:1163-1168.
9. Comber A., Fisher P., Wadsworth R. You know what land cover is but does anyone else? An investigation into semantic and ontological confusion. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2005, 26:223-228.
10. Comber A.J. The separation of land cover from land use with data primitives. Journal of Land Use Science 2008, 3:215-229.
11. Coreau A., Martin J.L. Multi-scale study of bird species distribution and of their response to vegetation change. A Mediterranean example. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:747-764.
12. Cracknell A.P. Review article synergy in remote sensing - what is in a pixel?. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:2025-2047.
13. Cushman S.A., McGarigal K. Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos 2004, 105:117-124.
14. Davis J.D., Debinski D.M., Danielson B.J. Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:1341-1354.
15. DSE Corporate Geospatial Data Library 2006, Department of Conservation and Environment, Victoria. 17th ed. M. O'Brien (Ed.).
16. Dungan J.L., Perry J.N., Dale M.R.T., Legendre P., Citron-Pousty S., Fortin M.-J., Jakomulska A., Miriti M., Rosenberg M.S. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 2002, 25:626-640.
17. Evans B.J. Dynamic display of spatial data-reliability: does it benefit the map user?. Computers & Geosciences 1997, 23:409-422.
18. Fisher P. The pixel: a snare and a delusion. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1997, 18:679-685.
19. Foody G.M. Sharpening fuzzy classification output to refine the representation of sub-pixel land cover distribution. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:2593-2599.
20. Gardner R., Lookingbill T., Townsend P., Ferrari J. A new approach for rescaling land cover data. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23:513-526.
21. Heikkinen R.K., Luoto M., Kuussaari M., Toivonen T. Modelling the spatial distribution of a threatened butterfly impacts of scale and statistical technique. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 79:347-357.
22. Holland J.D., Bert D.G., Fahrig L. Determining the spatial scale of species response to habitat. Bioscience 2004, 54:227-233.
23. Ivits E., Koch B. Landscape connectivity studies on segmentation based classification and manual interpretation of remote sensing data. eCognition User Meeting 2002.
24. Jelinski D., Wu J. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 1996, 11:129-140.
25. Krawchuk M.A., Taylor P.D. Changing importance of habitat structure across multiple spatial scales for three species of insects. Oikos 2003, 103:153-161.
26. Langford W.T., Gergel S.E., Dietterich T.G., Cohen W. Map misclassification can cause large errors in landscape pattern indices: examples from habitat fragmentation. Ecosystems 2006, 9:474-488.
27. Lawler J.J., O'Connor R.J., Hunsaker C.T., Jones K.B., Loveland T.R., White D. The effects of habitat resolution on models of avian diversity and distributions. A comparison of two land-cover classifications. Landscape Ecology 2004, 19:517-532.
28. Lechner A.M., Stein A., Jones S.D., Ferwerda J.G. Remote sensing of small and linear features. Quantifying the effects of patch size and length, grid position and detectability on land cover mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113:2194-2204.
29. Legendre P., Dale M.R.T., Fortin M.-J., Gurevitch J., Hohn M., Myers D. The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 2002, 25:601-615.
30. Levin S.A. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. The Ecological Society of America 1992, 73:1943-1967.
31. Marceau D.J., Hay G.J. Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 1999, 25:357-366.
32. Marceau D.J., Howarth P.J., Gratton D.J. Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 1.The scale and spatial aggregation problem. Remote Sensing of Environment 1994, 49:93-104.
33. Minor E.S., McDonald R.I., Treml E.A., Urban D.L. Uncertainty in spatially explicit population models. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:956-970.
34. Nelson A. Analysing data across geographic scales in Honduras: detecting levels of organisation within systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2001, 85:107-131.
35. O'Neill R.V., Johnson A.R., King A.W. A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale. Landscape Ecology 1989, 3:193-205.
36. Openshaw S. The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography 1984, 38.
37. Pearman P.B. The scale of community structure habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understory. Ecological Monographs 2002, 72:19-39.
38. Pontius R., Thontteh O., Chen H. Components of information for multiple resolution comparison between maps that share a real variable. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 2008, 15:111-142.
39. Pontius R.G., Connors J. Range of categorical associations for comparison of maps with mixed pixels. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2009, 75:963-969.
40. Robinson V.B. Issues and Challenges of Incorporating Fuzzy Sets in Ecological Modeling. Geographic Uncertainty in Environmental Security 2007, 33-51. Springer, Netherlands. A. Morris, S. Kokhan (Eds.).
41. Ruckelshaus M., Hartway C., Kareiva P. Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models. Conservation Biology 1997, 11:1298-1306.
42. Schmit C., Rounsevell M.D.A., La Jeunesse I. The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis. Environmental Science & Policy 2006, 9:174-188.
43. Shao G., Wu J. On the accuracy of landscape pattern analysis using remote sensing data. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23:505-511.
44. Soderstrom B., Part T. Influence of landscape scale on farmland birds breeding in semi-natural pastures. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:522-533.
45. Suorsa P., Huhta E., Jäntti A., Nikula A., Helle H., Kuitunen M., Koivunen V., Hakkarainen H. Thresholds in selection of breeding habitat by the Eurasian treecreeper (Certhia familiaris). Biological Conservation 2005, 121:443-452.
46. Taki H., Kevan P.G., Ascher J.S. Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:1575-1587.
47. Turner M.G. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1989, 20:171-197.
48. Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., O'Neill R.V. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice Pattern and Process 2001, Springer-Verlag, New York.
49. Wheatley M., Johnson C. Factors limiting our understanding of ecological scale. Ecological Complexity 2009, 6:150-159.
50. Wiens J.A. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 1989, 385-397.
51. Wintle B.A., Elith J., Potts J.M. Fauna habitat modelling and mapping. A review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Australian Ecology 2005, 30:719-738.
52. Wu J., Gao W., Tueller P.T. Effects of changing spatial scale on the results of statistical analysis with landscape data: a case study. Geographical Information Science 1997, 3:30-41.
53. Wu J., Hobbs R.J. Scale and Scaling: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective Key Topics in Landscape Ecology 2007, Cambridge University Press.
54. Wu J., Jelinski D.E., Luck M., Tueller P.T. Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographical Information Science 2000, 6:6-19.
55. Wu J., Li H. Concepts of scale and scaling. Scaling and Uncertainty Analysis in Ecology: Methods and Applications 2006, 3-15. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Jianguo Wu, K.B. Jones, H. Li, O.L. Louck (Eds.).
56. Wu J., Li H., Jones K., Loucks O. Scaling with known uncertainty: A synthesis. Scaling and Uncertainty Analysis in Ecology: Methods and Applications 2006, 329-346. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Jianguo Wu, K.B. Jones, H. Li, O.L. Louck (Eds.).
57. Zukowskyj P.M., Bussell M.A., Power C., Teeuw R.M. Quantitative accuracy assessment of contextually filtered classified images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2001, 22:3203-3222.
58. Zurell D., Berger U., Cabral J.S., Jeltsch F., Meynard C.N., Munkemuller T., Nehrbass N., Pagel J., Reineking B., Schroder B., Grimm V. The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers. Oikos 2010, 119:622-635.