Biogas fermentation of swine slurry based on the separation of concentrated liquid and low content liquid

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 187-194

  Deng, Liangwei ^a   Chen, Ziai ^a   Yang, Hao ^a   Zhu, Juanyu ^a   Liu, Yi ^a   Long, Yan ^a   Zheng, Dan ^a  

^a AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INSTITUTE   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Digestate; Excess heat; Sedimentation; Swine slurry

Indexed keywords

AEROBIC TREATMENT; BIOGAS FERMENTATION; BIOGAS GENERATION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; DIGESTATE; EXCESS HEAT; GRAVITATIONAL SEDIMENTATION; LOW CONCENTRATIONS; NUTRIENT CONTENTS; SWINE SLURRY;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOGAS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); SEDIMENTATION;

LIQUIDS;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOGAS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FERMENTATION; GAS PRODUCTION; OXIC CONDITIONS; SEDIMENTATION; SLURRY; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

SUIDAE;

EID: 84864317935     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Water Sci Technol 2000, 41(3):189-194.
2. Sanchez E., Borja R., Travieso L., Martin A., Colmenarejo M.F. Effect of organic loading rate on the stability, operational parameters and performance of a secondary up flow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating piggery waste. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96(3):335-344.
3. Hansen M.N., Kai P., Muller H.B. Effects of anaerobic digestion and separation of pig slurry on odor emission. Appl Eng Agr 2006, 22(1):135-139.
4. Chae K.J., Jang A., Yim S.K., Kim I.S. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99(1):1-6.
5. Kunz A., Miele M., Steinmetz R.L.R. Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100(22):5485-5489.
6. Lantz M., Svensson M., Bjornsson L., Borjesson P. The prospects for an expansion of biogas systems in Sweden-incentives, barriers and potentials. Energy Pol 2007, 35(3):1830-1843.
7. Raven R.P.J.M., Gregersen K.H. Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2007, 11(1):116-132.
8. Deng L.W., Gong J.J., Chen Z.A. Comparison of biogas plant between China and Germany. Renew Energ Resour 2008, 26(1):110-114. [in Chinese].
9. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85(4):849-860.
10. Ahring B.K. Status on science and application of thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 1994, 30(12):241-249.
11. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L., Ahring B.K. Applications of the anaerobic digestion process. Biomethanation II 2003, vol. 82:1-33. Springer, Berlin, (In: Scheper T, series editor. Adv Biochem Eng/Biotechnol; vol 82).
12. Weiland P. Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003, 109(1-3):263-274.
13. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99(17):7928-7940.
14. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants: status and future trends. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2003, 109(1-3):95-105.
15. Weiland P. Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany. Eng Life Sci 2006, 6(3):802-809.
16. Bohn I., Bjornsson L., Mattiasson B. The energy balance in farm scale anaerobic digestion of crop residues at 11-37°C. Process Biochem 2007, 42(1):57-64.
17. Hill D.T., Bolte J.P. Methane production from low solid concentration liquid swine waste using conventional anaerobic fermentation. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74(3):241-247.
18. APHA/AWWA/WEF Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC. 20th ed. L.S. Clesceri, A.E. Greenberg, A.D. Eaton (Eds.).
19. Martinez J., Burton C., Sneath R. A study of the potential contribution of sedimentation to aerobic treatment processes for pig slurry. J Agric Eng Res 1995, 61(2):87-96.
20. Walker P., Kelley T. Solids, organic load and nutrient concentration reductions in swine waste slurry using a polyacrylamide (PAM)-aided solids flocculation treatment. Bioresour Technol 2003, 90(2):151-158.
21. Wu L.J., Hao Y.Y., Sun C., Liu R.H. Effect of different solid concentration on biogas yield and composition during anaerobic fermentation process. Int J Global Energ Issues 2009, 31(3):240-250.
22. Deng L.W., Cai C.D., Chen Z.A. The treatment of pig slurry by a full-scale anaerobic-adding raw wastewater-intermittent aeration process. Biosystems Eng 2007, 98(3):327-334.
23. Deng L.W., Zheng P., Chen Z.A., Mahmood Q. Improvement in post-treatment of digested swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99(8):3136-3145.
24. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse 2003, McGraw-Hill, Boston. 4th ed. G. Tchobanoglous, F.L. Burton, H.D. Stensel (Eds.).
25. Arabic A.A., Abdo Z.O., Joyce P. Efficient use of animal manure on cropland-economic analysis. Bioresour Technol 2001, 79(2):179-191.