Longer term outcome of cognitive-behavioural and psychodynamic psychotherapy in routine mental health care: Randomised controlled trial

Behaviour Research and Therapy

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 580-587

  Watzke, Birgit ^a   Rüddel, Heinz ^b   Jürgensen, Ralph ^b   Koch, Uwe ^a   Kriston, Levente ^a   Grothgar, Barbara ^b   Schulz, Holger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b St Franziska Stift   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive behavioural therapy; Effectiveness; Evidence based practice; Psychodynamic therapy; Randomised controlled trial; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTMENT DISORDER; ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EATING DISORDER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL SEVERITY INDEX; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDER; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER; PSYCHODYNAMIC THERAPY; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOMATOFORM DISORDER; TREATMENT DURATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864301501     PISSN: 00057967     EISSN: 1873622X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barghaan D., Schulz H., Koch U., Watzke B. Versorgungsstrukturen im stationären Setting in Deutschland: Verteilung von Einzel- und Gruppentherapie und deren psychotherapeutischen Ausrichtungen. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik 2009, 45:83-103.
2. Begg C.B., Cho M., Eastwood S., Horton R., Moher D., Olkin I., et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Journal of the Medical Association 1996, 276(8):637-639.
3. Blagys M., Hilsenroth M.J. Distinctive activities of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clinical Psychology Review 2002, 22(5):671-706.
4. Blagys M.D., Hilsenroth M.J. Distinctive feature of short-term psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy: a review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice 2000, 7:167-188.
5. Butler A.C., Chapman J.E., Forman E.M., Beck A.T. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review 2006, 26:17-31.
6. Chambless D.L., Ollendick T.H. Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology 2001, 52:685-716.
7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
8. Cuijpers P., van Straten A., Andersson G., van Oppen P. Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2008, 76:909-922.
9. SCL-90-R, administration, scoring & procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version 1977, John Hopkins University School Medicine, Baltimore. L.R. Derogatis (Ed.).
10. Fiedler P. Verhaltenstherapie in und mit Gruppen. Praxis der Gruppenpsychotherapie 2001, 343-348. Thieme, Stuttgart/New York. V. Tschuschke (Ed.).
11. Fonagy P. Psychotherapy research: do we know what works for whom?. British Journal of Psychiatry 2010, 197:83-85.
12. Frank J.D. Therapeutic factors in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy 1971, 25:350-361.
13. Gallagher-Thompson D.E., Steffen A.M. Comparative effects of cognitive-behavioral and brief psychodynamic psychotherapies for depressed family caregivers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994, 62:543-549.
14. Goldfried M.R., Wolfe B.E. Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998, 66:143-150.
15. Grawe K., Donati R., Bernauer F. Psychotherapie im Wandel. Von der Konfession zur Profession 1994, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
16. Heigl-Evers A., Ott J. Die Bedeutung der psychoanalytisch-interaktionellen Grundeinstellungen für die Gruppentherapie. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik 1997, 33:55-73.
17. Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme. Deutsche Version 2000, Beltz, Göttingen. 2nd ed. L.M. Horowitz, B. Strauß, H. Kordy (Eds.).
18. Howard K.I., Krause M.S., Saunders S.M., Kopta S.M. Trials and tribulations in the meta-analysis of treatment differences: comment on Wampold et al. (1997). Psychological Bulletin 1997, 122:221-225.
19. Kazdin A.E., Bass D. Power to detect differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1989, 57:138-147.
20. Luborsky L., Singer B., Luborsky L. Comparative studies of psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry 1975, 32:995-1008.
21. Murray L., Cooper P.J., Wilson A., Romaniuk H. Controlled trial of the short- and long-term effect of psychological treatment of post-partum depression: 2. Impact on the mother-child relationship and child outcome. British Journal of Psychiatry 2003, 182:420-427.
22. Nathan P.E., Stuart S.P., Dolan S.L. Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: between Scylla and Charybdis?. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:964-981.
23. NICE Depression: Management of depression in primary and secondary care (Clinical guideline 22) 2004, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London.
24. Rosenzweig S. Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1936, 6:412-415.
25. What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research 2004, Guilford Press, New York. 2nd ed. A. Roth, P. Fonagy (Eds.).
26. Rothwell P.M. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet 2005, 365(9454):176-186.
27. Shafran R., Clark D.M., Fairburn C.G., Arntz A., Barlow D.H., Ehlers A., et al. Mind the gap: improving the dissemination of CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2009, 47:902-909.
28. Shapiro D.A., Shapiro D. Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: a replication and refinement. Psychological Bulletin 1982, 92:581-604.
29. Shapiro D.A., Rees A., Barkham M., Hardy G., Reynolds S., Startup M. Effects of treatment duration and severity of depression on the maintenance of gains after cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1995, 63:378-387.
30. Stiles W.B., Barkham M., Mellor-Clark J., Connell J. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, personcentred, and psychodynamic therapies in UK primary care routine practice: replication in a larger sample. Psychological Medicine 2008, 38:677-688.
31. Svartberg M., Stiles T. Comparive effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991, 59:704-714.
32. Svartberg M., Stiles T., Seltzer M.H. Randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy for cluster C personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 2004, 161:810-817.
33. Taylor G.J. Psychoanalysis and empirical research: the example of patients who lack psychological mindedness. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis 1995, 23:263-281.
34. Thompson L.W., Gallagher D. Efficacy of psychotherapy in the treatment of late-life depression. Advances in Behavioral Research and Therapy 1984, 6:127-139.
35. Tolin D.F. Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 2010, 30:710-720.
36. Valbak K. Suitability for psychoanalytic psychotherapy: a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2004, 109:164-178.
37. Waltz J., Addis M.E., Koerner K., Jacobsen N.S. Testing the integrity of a psychotherapeutic protocol: assessment of adherence and competence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993, 61:620-630.
38. Wampold B.E., Minami T., Baskin T.W., Tierney S.C. A meta-(re)analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus " other therapies" for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 2002, 68:159-165.
39. Wampold B.E., Mondin G.W., Moody M., Stich F., Benson K., Ahn H. A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: empirically, " all must have prizes" Psychological Bulletin 1997, 122:203-215.
40. Ware J.E. SF- 36 Health survey update. Spine 2000, 25(24):3130-3139.
41. Watzke B., Rueddel H., Juergensen R., Koch U., Grothgar B., Schulz H. Effectiveness of a systematic treatment selection for psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. British Journal of Psychiatry 2010, 197:96-105.
42. Watzke B., Rueddel H., Koch U., Rudolph M., Schulz H. Comparison of therapeutic action, style and content in cognitive-behavioural and psychodynamic group therapy under clinically representative conditions. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 2008, 15:404-417.
43. Watzke B., Scheel S., Bauer C., Rueddel H., Juergensen R., Koch U., et al. Differentielle Gruppenerfahrungen in psychoanalytisch und verhaltenstherapeutisch begründeten Gruppenpsychotherapien. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie 2004, 54:348-357.
44. Weisz J.R., Weersing V.R., Henggleler S.W. Jousting with straw men: comment on Westen, Novotny and Thompson-Brenner. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 131:418-426. discussion 427-433.
45. Westbrook D., Kirk J. The clinical effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy: outcome for a large sample of adults treated in routine practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2005, 43:1243-1261.