Practice-Friendly Research Review: Collaboration in Routine Care

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 209-220

  Lambert, Michael J ^a   Cattani, Kara ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Goal consensus; Outcome assessment; Outcome Questionnaire 45; Treatment failure, progress feedback

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84864299134     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: 10974679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.21835     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Psychological Association. (2005). Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. Retrieved from
2. Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J., Evans, C., Evans, R., & Margison, F. (2010). Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) - The CORE measures and systems. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: A guide for the psychological therapies (pp. 175-220). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Battle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A., Nash, E. R., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria for improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20, 184-192.
4. Busseri, M. A., & Tyler, J. D. (2004). Client-therapist agreement on Target problems, working alliance, and counseling outcomes. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 77-88.
5. Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2008). The Outcome and Session Rating Scales: The revised administration and scoring manual, including the Child Outcome Rating Scale. Chicago, IL: Institute for the Study of Therapeutic Change.
6. Finch, A. E., Lambert, M. J., & Schaalje, B. G. (2001). Psychotherapy quality control: The statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, 231-242.
7. Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 61, 155-163.
8. Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 329-343.
9. Harmon, S. C., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. M., Hawkins, E., Nielsen, S. L., Slade, K., & Lutz, W. (2007). Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 379-392.
10. Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K., & Tuttle, K. (2004). The effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 308-327.
11. Kazantzis, N., Deane, F. P., & Ronan, K. R. (2000). Homework assignments in cognitive and behavioral therapy: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 189-202.
12. Kazantzis, N., Whittington, C., & Dattilio, F. (2010). Meta-analysis of homework effects in cognitive behavioral therapy: A replication and extension. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17, 144-156.
13. Kraus, D., & Castonguay, L. G. (2010). Treatment Outcome Package (TOP) - Development and use in naturalistic settings. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: A guide for the psychological therapies (pp. 155-174). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Lambert, M. J., & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 72-79.
15. Lambert, M.J., Whipple, J. L., Bishop, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Gray, G. V., & Finch, A. E. (2002). Comparison of empirically derived and rationally derived methods for identifying patients at risk for treatment failure. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 149-164.
16. Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Smart, D. W., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 49-68.
17. Miller, S. D., & Duncan, B. L. (2004). The Outcome and Session Rating Scales: Administration and scoring manual. Chicago, IL: Institute for the Study of Therapeutic Change.
18. Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sorrell, R., & Brown, G. S. (2005). The Partners for Change Outcome System. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 61, 199-208.
19. Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2010). Evidence-based therapy relationships: Research conclusions &clinical practices. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 425-430). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298-311.
21. nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Warren, J. S., Nelson, P. L., & Burlingame, G. M. (2009). Identifying youth at risk for treatment failure in outpatient community mental health services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 690-701.
23. Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment failure and problem solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 59-68.