Partnering with the Pinoleville Pomo Nation: Co-Design Methodology Case Study for Creating Sustainable, Culturally Inspired Renewable Energy Systems and Infrastructure

Sustainability

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 794-818

  Shelby, Ryan ^a   Perez, Yael ^a   Agogino, Alice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Co design; Indigenous people; Native american; Renewable energy; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864291184     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su4050794     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Edmunds, D. PPN Environmental Program Purpose. Pinoleville Pomo Nation Environmental Program. Pinoleville Pomo Nation, 2009. Available online: http://70.90.171.169/departments/env/purpose%20page.htm (accessed on 19 April 2012).
2. Pinoleville Pomo Nation (PPN). Historical and Cultural Information of the Pinoleville Pomo Nation. 2002. Available online: http://70.90.171.169/literature/history.htm#h1 (accessed 19 April 2012).
3. Encyclopedia Britannica. Indian Reorganization Act. 2012, Encyclopedia Britannica. Available online: http://bit.ly/GPaMiF (accessed on 5 March 2012).
4. Government Printing Office. Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties; Government Printing Office: USA, 1958; Volume VI, Public Law 85-671.
5. Hardwick, T. v. United States, Civil No. C-79-1910-SW, N.D. Cal. 1983.
6. Estes, M. Campo's Renewable Energy: Security, Independence and Economic Development. In U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review FY 2011; DOE: USA, 2011. Available online: http://bit.ly/HdfLZK (accessed on 19 April 2012).
7. Maracle, B. Fort Yukon Wood Energy Program: Wood Boiler Deployment. In U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review FY 2011; U.S. Department of Energy: Fort Yukon, USA, 2011. Available online: http://bit.ly/Hdg2vS (accessed on 19 April 2012).
8. Howard, C. Elk Vallery Rancheria Energy Efficiency and Alternative Energy Analysis. In U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review FY 2011; Frank Zaino & Associates: North Stonington, CT, USA, 2011. Available online: http://bit.ly/HdgQAV (accessed on 19 April 2012).
9. Anderson, T. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California-Tribal Multi-County Weatherization Energy Program. In U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review FY 2009; Scotts, Valley Band of Pomo Indians: Scotts Valley, California, USA, 2011. Available online: http://bit.ly/HdgeLs (accessed on 19 April 2012).
10. Ambler, M. Breaking the Iron Bonds: Indian Control of Energy Development; University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, KS, USA, 1990.
11. Nadasdy, P. Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge, and Aboriginal-State Relations in the Southwest Yukon; UBC Press: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2003.
12. Smith, S.; Frehner, B. Indians & Energy: Exploitation and Opportunity in the American Southwest; School for Advance Research Press: Santa Fe, NM, USA, 2010.
13. U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau News: Facts for Features: American Indian and Alaska Native Heritage Month, 2011. Available online: http://1.usa.gov/zByqfx (accessed on 19 April 2012).
14. Allen, M. Native american control of tribal natural resource development in the context of the federal trust and tribal self-determination. Boston Coll. Environ. Aff. Law Rev. 1989, 857, 1988-1989.
15. Deloria, V.; Lytle, C. The Nations Within: The Past and Future of American Indian Sovereignty; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 1998.
16. Navajo Nation. Navajo Nation Environmental Policy Act. Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency; 2009. Available online: http://bit.ly/8b74ji (accessed on 10 April 2012).
17. Battiest, T. Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (NTUA)-Wind Energy Feasibility Study. In U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review FY 2008; NTUA: USA, 2009. Available online: http://bit.ly/77JGQX (accessed on 19 April 2012).
18. Sandia National Laboratories. Tribal Energy Program. Available online: http://energy.sandia.gov/ ?page_id=332 (accessed on 19 April 2012).
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation: Five-Year Plan. EPA Region 9, 2008. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/region9/superfund/navajo-nation/ (accessed on 19 April 2012).
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health and Environmental Impacts of Uranium Contamination in the Navajo Nation. EPA Region 9, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/region9/ superfund/navajo-nation/pdf/Navajo8_11final.pdf (accessed on 9 April 2012).
21. Arfsten, D.; Still, K.; Ritchie, G. A review of the effects of uranium and depleted uranium exposure on reproduction and fetal development. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2001, 17, 180-191.
22. Hindin, R.; Brugge, D.; Panikkar, B. Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review from an epidemiological perspective. Environ. Health 2005, 4, doi:10.1186/1476-069X-4-17.
23. MacMillian, L. Uranium mines dot Navajo land, neglected and still perilous. New York Times, 2012. Available online: http://nyti.ms/HqVcLP (accessed on 9 April 2012).
24. Brundtland Commission. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
25. Redclift, M. The meaning of sustainable development. Geoforum 1992, 25, 395-403.
26. Farrell, A.; Hart, M. What does sustainability really mean? The search for meaningful indicators. Environment 1998, 40, 4-7, 26-31.
27. Jamieson, D. Sustainability and beyond. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 24, 183-192.
28. Neumayer, E. Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, Camberley, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, 2004.
29. Ulrich, K.; Eppinger, S. Product Design and Development, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
30. Norman, D. The Design of Everyday Things; Bantam Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1989.
31. Morgan, D. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1993.
32. Charmaz, K. Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis. In Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns; Sage Publications, Inc.: Teller Road, USA, 2003; pp. 311-330.
33. Griffin, A.; Hauser, J. The voice of the customer. Mark. Sci. 1993, 12, 1-27.
34. Shelby, R.; Perez, Y.; Agogino, A. Co-Design Methodology for the Development of Sustainable and Renewable Energy Systems for Underserved Communities: A Case Study with the Pinoleville Pomo Nation. In Proceedings of ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 12-15 August 2011.
35. Street, P. Scenario workshops: A participatory approach to sustainable urban living? Futures 1997, 29, 139-158.
36. Frasera, E.; Dougill, A.; Mabee, W.; Reed, M.; McAlpine, P. Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 2006, 78, 114-127.
37. U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA). California Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet), 2012. Available online: http://bit.ly/GA69rP (accessed on 19 April 2012).
38. Cohn, A. Student design embraced by Pinoleville Pomo Nation. UC Berkeley College of Engineering's ForeFront, 2009. Available online: http://bit.ly/HYSTjr (accessed on 19 April 2012).
39. Miline, M.; Liggett, R.; Al-Shaali, R. Climate Consultant 3.0: A Tool for Visualizing Building Energy Implications of Climates. In Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Association Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA, 8-12 July 2007.
40. Miline, M. Climate Consultant 5.3; University of California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2012. Available online: http://bit.ly/5bEcOc (accessed on 19 April 2012).
41. Edmunds, D.; Shelby, R. 2009 Pinoleville Pomo Nation Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Status. In Proceedings of the 2009 U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review, Denver, CO, USA, 16-20 November 2009. Available online: http://bit.ly/GAC270 (accessed on 19 April 2012).
42. Smith, D.; Shelby, R. Pinoleville Pomo Nation Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Status. In Proceedings of the 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review, Denver, CO, USA, 16-20 November 2011. Available online: http://bit.ly/GACgLa (accessed on 19 April 2012).
43. Steele, L.; Edmunds, D. Pinoleville Pomo Nation Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Status. In 2010 U.S. Department of Energy Tribal Energy Program Review; Department of Energy, U.S., 2010. Available online: http://bit.ly/GAdPdC (accessed on 9 April 2012).
44. U.S. Department of Interior. BIA Awarded $27 Million Reading First Grant by U.S. Department of Education, 2009. Available online: http://www.bia.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/ text/idc013255.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2012).
45. Colombi, B. Salmon and the adaptive capacity of Nimiipuu (Nez Perce) culture to cope with change. Am. Indian Q. 2012, 36, 75-97.
46. Sustainable Social Design: UC Berkeley. Pinoleville Pomo Nation Collaboration website. Available online: http://pomo.planetcares.org (accessed on 19 April 2012).
47. Schultz, T.; Shelby, R.; Agogino, A. The Co-Design of Water and Energy Efficient Sustainable Housing with the Pinoleville Pomo Nation. In Proceedings of the ASME International Sustainability Conferences; Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17-22 May 2010.
48. Community Assessment of Renewable Energy and Sustainability. Advanced E-Team Grant Profile. National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, 2008. Available online: http://bit.ly/Ir134 (accessed on19 April 2012).
49. Center for Information Technology in the Interest of Society (CITRIS) provided seed funding for Community Assessment of Renewable Energy and Sustainability (CARES). Available online: http://citris-uc.org/research/projects/cares (accessed on 19 April 2012).