Ultrastructural characterization of the adhesive organ of Idiosepius biserialis and Idiosepius pygmaeus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda)

Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1499-1510

  Cyran, Norbert ^a   Klepal, Waltraud ^a   Von Byern, Janek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

adhesion; adhesive organ; cephalopod; glandular structure; glue; glue synthesis; ultrastructure

Indexed keywords

BENTHOS; CELL ORGANELLE; CEPHALOPOD; HISTOLOGY; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MEMBRANE; MORPHOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; PROTEIN; RECONSTRUCTION; TIDAL CYCLE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALIA; CEPHALOPODA; IDIOSEPIIDAE; IDIOSEPIUS BISERIALIS; IDIOSEPIUS PYGMAEUS; MOLLUSCA;

EID: 84864290373     PISSN: 00253154     EISSN: 14697769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002531541100021X     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Appellöf A. (1898) Cephalopoden von Ternate. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 24, 570-637.
2. Cyran N. von Byern J. and Klepal W. (2005) Ultrastructure of the adhesive organ of Idiosepius (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Microscopy Conference 6. Dreiländertagung 28.08.-02.09.2005. Davos: Paul Scherrer Institut, 164pp.
3. Flammang P. (2006) Adhesive secretions in echinoderms: an overview. In Smith A.M. and Callow J.A. (eds) Biological adhesives. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 183-206.
4. Fukuda Y. (1980) Observations by SEM. In Hamada T., Obata I. and Okutani T. (eds) Nautilus macromphalus in captivity\-Japanese expert consultation on living Nautilus. Tokyo: Tokai University Press, pp. 23-33.
5. Fukuda Y. (1988) Histology of the long digital tentacles. In Saunders W.B. and Landman N.H. (eds) Nautilus. The biology and paleobiology of a livingfossil. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, pp. 249 - 256.
6. Gay C. (2002) Stickiness\-some fundamentals of adhesion. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42, 1123-1126.
7. Gay C. and Leibler L. (1999) On stickiness. Physics Today 52, 48-52. (Pubitemid 129596912)
8. Hermans C.O. (1983). The duo-gland adhesive system. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 21, 283-339.
9. Kier W.M. (1987) The functional morphology of the tentacle musculature of Nautilus pompilius. In Saunders W.B. and Landman N.H. (eds) Nautilus. The biology andpaleobiology of a living fossil. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, pp. 257-269.
10. Kier W.M. and Smith A.M. (2002) The structure and adhesive mechan-ism of Octopus suckers. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42, 1146-1153. (Pubitemid 36543897)
11. Muntz W.R.A. and Wentworth S.L. (1995) Structure of the adhesive surface of the digital tentacles of Nautilus pompilius. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 75, 747-750.
12. Nesis K. (1982) Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species known to date. In Burgess L. A. (eds) Translated from Russian by B.S. Levitov. V.A.A.P. Copyright Agency of the Ud SSR for Light and Food Industry Publishing House; Moscow, 1987 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Ltd., for English Translation, 351 pp.
13. Pennisi E. (2002) Biology reveals new ways to hold on tight. Science 296, 250-251. (Pubitemid 34303652)
14. Reynolds E.S. (1963) The use of lead citrate at high p H as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 17, 208-212.
15. Roeleveld M.A.C. (1972) A review of the Sepiidae (Cephalopoda) of Southern Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 59, 193-313.
16. Ruth P., Schmidtberg H., Westermann B. and Schipp R. (2002) The sensory epithelium of the tentacles and the rhinophore of Nautilus pompilius L. (Cephalopoda, Nautiloidea). Journal of Morphology 251, 239-255. (Pubitemid 34161699)
17. Sasaki M. (1921) On an adhering habit of a pygmy cuttlefish, Idiosepius pygmaeus Steenstrup. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 10, 209-213.
18. Singley C.T. (1982) Histochemistry and fine structure of the ectodermal epithelium of the sepiolid squid Euprymna scolopes. Malacologia 23, 177-192.
19. Smith A.M. (1996) Cephalopod sucker design and the physical limits to negative pressure. Journal of Experimental Biology 199, 949-958. (Pubitemid 126603734)
20. Smith A.M. (2006). The biochemistry and mechanics of gastropod adhesive gels. In Smith A.M. and Callow J.A. (eds) Biological adhesives. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 167-182
21. Steenstrup J. (1881) Sepiadarium and Idiosepius two new genera of the family of Sepia. With remarks on the two related forms Sepioloidea d'Orb. and Spirula Lmk. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs skrifter Raekke 6, 211-242.
22. Suwanmala J., von Byern J. and Nabhitabhata J. (2006) Observation of Idiosepius pygmaeus (Cephalopoda, Idiosepiidae) at Klong Bangrong, Phuket Island, Thailand. Phuket Marine Biological Center Research Bulletin 67,49-51.
23. Tyler S. (1976) Comparative ultrastructure of adhesive systems in the Turbellaria. Zoomorphology 84, 1 -76.
24. Tyler S. (1988) The role of function in determination of homology and convergence-examples from invertebrate adhesive organs. Fortschritte der Zoologie 36, 331-347.
25. Tyler S. and Rieger G.E. (1980) Adhesive organs of the Gastrotricha I. Duo-gland organs. Zoomorphology 95, 1-15.
26. von Boletzky S. and Roeleveld M.A.C. (2000) 'Ventral adhesion' to hard substrates: a thigmotactic response in sepiid cuttlefish (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Vie et Milieu 50, 59-64. (Pubitemid 30319364)
27. von Byern J. and Klepal W. (2006) Adhesive mechanisms in cephalopods: a review. Biofouling 22, 329-338.
28. Von Byern J., Rudoll L. Cyran N. and Klepal W. (2008) Histochemical characterization of the adhesive organ of three Idiosepius spp. species. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 83, 29-46. (Pubitemid 351863903)