Variation in foliar nitrogen and albedo in response to nitrogen fertilization and elevated CO2

Oecologia

Volumn 169, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 915-925

  Wicklein, Haley F ^a   Ollinger, Scott V ^a   Martin, Mary E ^a   Hollinger, David Y ^b   Lepine, Lucie C ^a   Day, Michelle C ^a   Bartlett, Megan K ^c   Richardson, Andrew D ^d   Norby, Richard J ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Albedo; Free air CO2 enrichment; Leaf structure; Nitrogen; Nitrogen fertilization

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; FERTILIZER; NITROGEN;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ALBEDO; AVIRIS; CANOPY REFLECTANCE; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECIDUOUS TREE; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; GRASSLAND; NITROGEN; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA;

ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT RELATED PHENOMENA; METABOLISM; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; REMOTE SENSING; SUNLIGHT; TREE; UNITED STATES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; FERTILIZERS; MASSACHUSETTS; NITROGEN; OPTICAL PROCESSES; PLANT LEAVES; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; SPECTROSCOPY, NEAR-INFRARED; SUNLIGHT; TENNESSEE; TREES;

HARVARD FOREST; MASSACHUSETTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84864287587     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2263-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andrieu B, Baret F, Jacquemoud S, Malthus T, Steven M (1997) Evaluation of an improved version of SAIL model for simulating bidirectional reflectance of sugar beet canopies. Remote Sens Environ 60: 247-257.
2. Asner GP (1998) Biophysical and biochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance. Remote Sens Environ 64: 234-253.
3. Braswell BH, Schimel DS, Privette JL, Moore B III, Emery WJ, Sulzman EW, Hudak AT (1996) Extracting ecological and biophysical information from AVHRR optical data: an integrated algorithm based on inverse modeling. J Geophys Res 101: 23335-23348.
4. 2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 3. Canopy architecture and gas exchange. Photosynth Res 66: 97-108.
5. Castro-Esau KL, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Rivard B, Wright AJ, Quesada M (2006) Variability in leaf optical properties of Mesoamerican trees and the potential for species classification. Am J Bot 94: 517-530.
6. Chen JM, Cihlar J (1995) Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods. IEEE Transact Geosci Remote Sens 33: 777-787.
7. Close DC, Beadle CL (2006) Leaf angle responds to nitrogen supply in eucalypt seedlings. Is it a photoprotective mechanism? Tree Physiol 26: 743-748.
8. Daughtry CST, Walthall CL, Kim MS, Brown de Colstoun E, McMurtrey JE III (2000) Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote Sens Environ 74: 229-239.
9. 2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Glob Change Biol 10: 2121-2138.
10. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78: 9-19.
11. Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: Givinsh TI (ed) On the economy of form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25-55.
12. Gates DM, Keegan HJ, Schleter JC, Weidner VR (1965) Spectral properties of plants. Appl Opt 4: 11-20.
13. Gausman HW, Allen WA, Cardenas R, Richardson AJ (1970) Relation of light reflectance to historical and physical evaluations of cotton leaf maturity. Appl Opt 9: 545-552.
14. Gausman HW, Allen WA, Escobar DE (1974) Refractive index of plant cell walls. Appl Opt 13: 109-111.
15. Gueymard C (2004) The sun's total and spectral irradiance for solar energy applications and solar radiation models. Sol Energy 76: 423-453.
16. Hollinger DY, Ollinger SV, Richardson AD, Meyers TP, Dail DB, Martin ME, Scott NA, Arkebauer TJ, Baldocchi DD, Clark KL, Curtis PS, Davis KJ, Desai AR, Dragoni D, Goulden ML, Gu L, Katul GG, Pallardy SG, Paw UKT, Schmid HP, Stoy PC, Suyker AE, Verma SB (2010) Albedo estimates for land surface models and support for a new paradigm based on foliage nitrogen concentration. Glob Change Biol 16: 696-710.
17. Huemmrich KF, Goward SN (1997) Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and NDVI: an assessment for ten tree species with the SAIL model. Remote Sens Environ 61: 254-269.
18. Iversen CM, Norby RJ (2008) Nitrogen limitation in a sweetgum plantation: implications for carbon allocation and storage. Can J For Res 38: 1021-1032.
19. Jacquemoud S, Verhoef W, Baret F, Bacour C, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Asner GP, François C, Ustin SL (2009) PROSPECT + SAIL models: a review of use for vegetation characterization. Remote Sens Environ 113: S56-S66.
20. 2 on nutrient cycling in a sweetgum plantation. Biogeochemistry 69: 379-403.
21. Knapp AK, Carter GA (1998) Variability in leaf optical properties among 26 species from a broad range of habitats. Am J Bot 85: 940-946.
22. Longstreth DJ, Bolaños JA, Goddard RH (1985) Photosynthetic rate and mesophyll surface area in expanding leaves of Alternanthera philoxeroides grown at two light levels. Am J Bot 72: 14-19.
23. Magill AH, Aber JD, Currie WS, Nadelhoffer KJ, Martin ME, McDowell WH, Melillo JM, Steudler P (2004) Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Havard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA. For Ecol Manag 196: 7-28.
24. Malenovský Z, Martin E, Homolová L, Gastellu-Etchegorry J-P, Zurita-Milla R, Schaepman ME, Pokorný R, Clevers JGPW, Cudlín P (2008) Influence of woody elements of a Norway spruce canopy on nadir reflectance simulated by the DART model at very high spatial resolution. Remote Sens Environ 112: 1-18.
25. Niinemets U (1999) Research review: components of leaf dry mass per area-thickness and density-alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytol 144: 35-47.
26. Niinemets U (2001) Global-scale climatic controls of leaf dry mass per area, density, and thickness in trees and shrubs. Ecology 82: 453-469.
27. Nobel PS, Zaragoza LJ, Smith WK (1975) Relation between mesophyll surface area, photosynthetic rate, and illumination level during development for leaves of Plectranthus parviflorus Henckel. Plant Physiol 55: 1067-1070.
28. 2-enriched sweetgum forest. Ecology 87: 5-14.
29. 2-enriched sweetgum stand. New Phytol 150: 477-487.
30. 2. Oecologia 136: 574-584.
31. Ollinger SV (2011) Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. New Phytol 189: 375-394.
32. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Lovett GM, Millham SE, Lathrop RG, Ellis JE (1993) A spatial model of atmospheric deposition for the Northeastern US. Ecol Appl 3: 459-472.
33. Ollinger SV, Richardson AD, Martin ME, Hollinger DY, Frolking S, Reich PB, Plourde LC, Katul GG, Munger JW, Oren R, Smith ML, Paw UKT, Bolstad PV, Cook BD, Day MC, Martin TA, Monson RK, Schmid HP (2008) Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: functional relations and potential climate feedbacks. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105: 19335-19340.
34. 2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411: 469-472.
35. Rademacher IF, Nelson CJ (2001) Nitrogen effects on leaf anatomy within the intercalary meristems of tall fescue leaf blades. Ann Bot 88: 893-903.
36. Rautiainen M, Stenberg P, Nilson T, Kuusk A (2004) The effect of crown shape on the reflectance of coniferous stands. Remote Sens Environ 89: 41-52.
37. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Nat Acad Sci 94: 13730-13734.
38. Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB, Vose JM, Gresham C, Volin JC, Bowman WD (1999) Generality of leaf train relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80: 1955-1969.
39. Riggs JS, Tharp ML, Norby RJ (2009) ORNL FACE CO2 data. carbon dioxide information analysis center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. http://cdiac.ornl.gov. Accessed 15-July-2010.
40. Sánchez J, Canton MP (1999) Space imaging processing. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton.
41. Slaton MR, Hunt ER, Smith WK (2001) Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics. Am J Bot 88: 278-284.
42. Smolander S, Stenberg P (2003) A method to account for shoot scale clumping in coniferous canopy reflectance models. Remote Sens Environ 88: 363-373.
43. Tari DB, Gazanchian A, Pirdashti HA, Nasiri M (2009) Flag leaf morphophysiological response to different agronomical treatments in a promising line of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Am-Euras J Agric Environ Sci 5: 403-408.
44. Verhoef W (1984) Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modeling: the SAIL model. Remote Sens Environ 16: 125-141.
45. Woolley JT (1971) Reflectance and transmittance of light by leaves. Plant Physiol 47: 656-662.
46. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821-827.
47. Zhang Q, Xiao X, Braswell BH, Linder E, Ollinger S, Smith ML, Jenkins JP, Baret F, Richardson AD, Moore B III, Minocha R (2006) Characterization of seasonal variation of forest canopy in a temperate deciduous broadleaf forest, using daily MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ 105: 189-203.