Journal report card

Scientometrics

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 249-260

  Bar Ilan, Judit ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

90 percentile; Journal report card; Median; Synchronous h index for journals

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864286564     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0671-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Australian Research Council (no date). Ranked outlets. Retrieved from http://www. arc. gov. au/era/era_2010/archive/era_journal_list. htm.
2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Rankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 141-147.
3. Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor-Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314-316.
4. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687.
5. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.
6. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1996). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7), 107-117.
7. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (2011). Methodology. Retrieved from http://www. leidenranking. com/methodology. aspx.
8. Egghe, L. (2006). The theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
9. ESF (2012). ERIH foreword. Retrieved from http://www. esf. org/research-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-the-humanities/erih-foreword. html.
10. eigenfactor. org (no date). Eigenfactor score and article influence score: Detailed methods. Retrieved from http://www. eigenfactor. org/methods. pdf.
11. González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2009). The SJR indicator: A new indicator of journals' scientific prestige. Retrieved from http://arxiv. org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912. 4141. pdf.
12. Harzing, A. W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics & business? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46.
13. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., & Wormell, I. (2000). Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluation. In B. Cronin & H. Barsky Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge. A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 373-387). Medford: Information Today.
14. Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265-277.
15. Moed, H. F., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 461-467.
16. Moed, H. F., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1996). Impact factors can mislead. Nature, 381(6579), 186.
17. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297-312.
18. Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0561-0.
19. Zitt, M. (2010). Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 392-406.
20. Zitt, M., & Small, H. (2008). Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1856-1860.