Wireless substitution: State-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007

National Health Statistics Reports

Volumn , Issue 14, 2009, Pages

  Blumberg, Stephen J ^a   Luke, Julian V ^a   Davidson, Gestur ^b   Davern, Michael E ^b   Yu, Tzy Chyi ^b   Soderberg, Karen ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell phones; Noncoverage; Telephone surveys; Wireless substitution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CELLULAR PHONE; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS (U.S.); TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84864285633     PISSN: 21648344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates based on data from the National Health Interview Survey, January-June 2008. National Center for Health Statistics. 2008. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis/releases.htm.
2. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Coverage bias in traditional telephone surveys of low-income and young adults. Public Opinion Quarterly 71:734-49. 2007.
3. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: Evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health 96:926-31. 2006.
4. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML, Frankel MR. Recent trends in household telephone coverage in the United States. In JM Lepkowski et al. (eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology 56-86. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2008.
5. Schirm AL, DiCarlo JR. Using Bayesian shrinkage methods to derive state estimates of poverty, food stamp program eligibility, and food stamp program participation. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. 1998. Available from: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/bayesian.pdf.
6. National Research Council. Small area income and poverty estimates: Priorities for 2000 and beyond. Panel on Estimates of Poverty for Small Geographical Areas, CF Citro and G Kalton, editors. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2000.
7. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis, 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 2003.
8. AAPOR Cell Phone Task Force. Guidelines and considerations for survey researchers when planning and conducting RDD and other telephone surveys in the U.S. with respondents reached via cell phone numbers. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2008. Available from: http://www.aapor.org/uploads/Final_AAPOR_Cell_Phone_TF_report_041208.pdf.
9. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix, and Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Areas, WC Docket No. 07-97, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08-174. Federal Communications Commission. July 25, 2008. Available from: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-174A1.pdf.
10. Davern M, Jones A, Lepkowski J, Davidson G, Blewitt LA. Estimating regression standard errors with data from the Current Population Survey's public use file. Inquiry 44:211-24. 2007.