Developing and using evidence to improve rehabilitation practice

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 93, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2012, Pages

  Seel, Ronald T ^a   Dijkers, Marcel P ^b   Johnston, Mark V ^c  

^a SHEPHERD CENTER   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness research; Evidence based medicine; Evidence based practice; Practice guidelines as topic; Randomized controlled trials as topic; Rehabilitation; Review literature as topic; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNAL VALIDITY; KNOWLEDGE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTION; PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84864283356     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.008     Document Type: Note

References (31)

1. U.S. Institute of Medicine The future of disability in America 2007 Institute of Medicine, National Academies Pr Washington (DC)
2. U.S. Institute of Medicine Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research 2009 Institute of Medicine, National Academies Pr Washington (DC)
3. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ strategic plan 2007 U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville
4. European Commission Research and Innovation Information Service Seventh Framework Programme: FP7 2007-2013 http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home-en.html Accessed April 26, 2012
5. S. West, V. King, T. Carey Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence AHRQ publication No. 02-E016 2002 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville Evidence report/technology assessment No. 47
6. J. Eden, L. Levit, A. Berg, S. Morton Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews 2011 Institute of Medicine, National Academies Pr Washington (DC)
7. R. Graham, M. Mancher, D.M. Wolman, S. Greenfield, E.E. Steinberg Clinical practice guidelines we can trust 2011 Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Pr Washington (DC)
8. S.R. Tunis, D.B. Stryer, C.M. Clancy Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy JAMA 290 2003 1624 1632
9. M. Johnston, G. Vanderheiden, M. Farkas, E. Rogers, J. Summers, J. Westbrook The challenge of evidence in disability and rehabilitation research and practice: a position paper NCDDR Task Force on Standards of Evidence and Methods 2009 SEDL Austin
10. M. Johnston, M. Sherer, J. Whyte Applying evidence standards to rehabilitation research Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85 2006 292 309
11. M.V. Johnston, K.J. Ottenbacher, J.E. Graham, P.A. Findley, A.C. Hansen Systematically assessing and improving the quality and outcomes of medical rehabilitation programs W.R. Frontera, J.A. DeLisa, Physical medicine & rehabilitation: principles and practice 5th ed. 2010 Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health Philadelphia 325 355
12. S.D. Horn, J. Gassaway Practice-based evidence: incorporating clinical heterogeneity and patient-reported outcomes for comparative effectiveness research Med Care 48 6 Suppl 1 2010 S17 S22
13. D. Cella, S. Yount, N. Rothrock The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years Med Care 45 5 Suppl 1 2007 S3 S11
14. L.A. Quatrano, T.H. Cruz Future of outcomes measurement: impact on research in medical rehabilitation and neurologic populations Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92 10 Suppl 1 2011 S7 S11
15. D. Amtmann, K.F. Cook, K.L. Johnson, D. Cella The PROMIS initiative: involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation research Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92 10 Suppl 1 2011 S12 S19
16. J. Whyte, A. Barrett Advancing the evidence base of rehabilitation treatments: a developmental approach Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S101 S110
17. J.E. Graham, A.M. Karmarkar, K.J. Ottenbacher Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S111 S116
18. T. Hart, E. Bagiella Design and implementation of clinical trials in rehabilitation research Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S117 S126
19. S.D. Horn, G. DeJong, D. Deutscher Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observation studies Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S127 S137
20. M.V. Johnston, R.O. Smith Single subject designs: current methodologies and future directions Occup Ther J Res Occup Participation Health 30 2010 4 10
21. M. Bloom, J. Fischer, J.G. Orme Evaluating practice: guidelines for the accountable professional 6th ed. 2009 Allyn and Bacon Boston
22. A.I. Maas, A. Marmarou, G.D. Murray, S.G. Teasdale, E.W. Steyerberg Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study J Neurotrauma 24 2007 232 238
23. E.W. Steyerberg Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating 2009 Springer New York
24. R.T. Seel, E.W. Steyerberg, J.F. Malec, M. Sherer, S.N. Macciocchi Developing and evaluating prediction models in rehabilitation populations Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S138 S153
25. C.A. Velozo, S. Magasi, A.W. Heinemann, S. Romero, R.T. Seel Improving measurement methods in rehabilitation: core concepts and recommendations for scale development Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S154 S163
26. M.P. Dijkers, S.L. Murphy, J. Krellman Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S164 S176
27. P.A. Brown, M.K. Harniss, K.G. Schomer, M. Feinberg, N.K. Cullen, K.L. Johnson Conducting systematic evidence reviews: core concepts and lessons learned Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S177 S184
28. M.V. Johnston, M.P. Dijkers Toward improved evidence standards and methods for rehabilitation: recommendations and challenges Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93 8 Suppl 2 2012 S185 S199
29. G. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, E.A. Akl GRADE guidelines: 1 Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 383 394
30. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, H.J. Schunemann, P. Tugwell, A. Knottnerus GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 380 382
31. G. Gronseth, L.K. Moses, T.S. Getchius Clinical practice guideline process manual: 2011 edition 2011 American Academy of Neurology St. Paul