Right versus left transradial approach for coronary catheterization in octogenarian patients

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 267-272

  Freixa, Xavier ^a   Trilla, Marc ^a   Feldman, Matías ^a   Jiménez, Marcelo ^a   Betriu, Amadeo ^a   Masotti, Mõnica ^a  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

coronary angiogram; left radial; octogenarians; transradial approach

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GERIATRIC CARE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEFT TRANSRADIAL APPROACH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIAL DISSECTION; RADIAL HEMATOMA; RADIAL PERFORATION; RADIAL SPASM; RIGHT TRANSRADIAL APPROACH;

AGE FACTORS; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIAC CATHETERS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SPAIN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84864280924     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23474     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: e18-e209.
2. TIME Investigators. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): A randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 951-957.
3. Assali AR, Moustapha A, Sdringola S, et al. The dilemma of success: Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients > or = 75 years of age-successful but associated with higher vascular complications and cardiac mortality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 195-199. (Pubitemid 36665950)
4. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, Klinke WP, Carere RG, Pi D, Berry B, Hilton JD,. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: The M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008; 94: 1019-1025. (Pubitemid 352039884)
5. Sciahbasi A, Pristipino C, Ambrosio G, et al. Arterial access-site-related outcomes of patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures for acute coronary syndromes (from the ComPaRison of Early Invasive and Conservative Treatment in Patients With Non-ST-ElevatiOn Acute Coronary Syndromes [PRESTO-ACS] Vascular Substudy). Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 796-800.
6. Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, Hong T, Suen CM, Sharieff W, Chisholm RJ, Kutryk MJ, Fam NP, Cheema AN,. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 1057-1064.
7. Kawashima O, Endoh N, Terashima M, et al. Effectiveness of right or left radial approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 61: 333-337. (Pubitemid 38298268)
8. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, et al. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 172-179.
9. Kanei Y, Nakra NC, Liou M, Vales LL, Gowda R, Rosero H, Kwan T, Fox JT,. Randomized comparison of transradial coronary angiography via right or left radial artery approaches. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 195-197.
10. Santas E, Bodi V, Sanchis J, Nunez J, Mainar L, Minana G, Chorro FJ, Llacer A,. The left radial approach in daily practice. A randomized study comparing femoral and right and left radial approaches. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62: 482-490.
11. Fernandez-Portales J, Valdesuso R, Carreras R, Jimenez-Candil J, Serrador A, Romani S,. [Right versus left radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Differences observed and the learning curve]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59: 1071-1074. (Pubitemid 44823390)
12. Jaffe R, Hong T, Sharieff W, Chisholm RJ, Kutryk MJ, Charron T, Cheema AN,. Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 815-820. (Pubitemid 46867482)
13. Chauhan MS, Kuntz RE, Ho KL, Cohen DJ, Popma JJ, Carrozza JP Jr, Baim DS, Cutlip DE,. Coronary artery stenting in the aged. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 856-862. (Pubitemid 32202455)
14. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kallert L, Turan N, Krahner R, Wolf T, Garlichs C, Flachskampf F, Daniel WG, Ludwig J,. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 629-635.
15. Vorobcsuk A, Konyi A, Aradi D, Horvath IG, Ungi I, Louvard Y, Komocsi A,. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction systematic overview and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 814-821.
16. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Rao S, Lioy E,. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: The TALENT dosimetric substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 226-231.