Transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling models to teach maternal-fetal medicine fellows

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 497-502

  McWeeney, Dennis T ^a   Schwendemann, Wade D ^b   Nitsche, Joshua F ^b   Rose, Carl H ^b   Davies, Norman P ^b   Watson, William J ^b   Brost, Brian C ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

chorionic villus sampling; education model; fellow training; procedure for karyotyping; simulation; task trainer

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL; ADULT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CONDOM; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NONHUMAN; PIGLET; PLACENTA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SWINE; TRANSCERVICAL CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERUS;

ADULT; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PERINATOLOGY; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84864277887     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310518     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Coustan DR, Schwartz RM, Gagnon DE, VanDorsten JP.; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The distribution, practice, and attitudes of maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2001; 185 1218 1225 (Pubitemid 33097390)
2. Jenkins TM, Mackey SF, Benzoni EM, Tolosa JE, Sciscione AC. Non-obstetric surgery during gestation: risk factors for lower birthweight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol: 2003; 43 27 31 (Pubitemid 36582523)
3. Brambati B, Terzian E, Tognoni G. Randomized clinical trial of transabdominal versus transcervical chorionic villus sampling methods. Prenat Diagn: 1991; 11 285 293
4. Smidt-Jensen S, Permin M, Philip J., et al. Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Lancet: 1992; 340 1237 1244
5. Jackson LG, Zachary JM, Fowler SE., et al. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group. A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. N Engl J Med: 1992; 327 594 598
6. Chueh JT, Goldberg JD, Wohlferd MM, Golbus MS. Comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling loss rates in nine thousand cases from a single center. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1995; 173 1277 1282
7. Pittini R, Oepkes D, Macrury K, Reznick R, Beyene J, Windrim R. Teaching invasive perinatal procedures: assessment of a high fidelity simulator-based curriculum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: 2002; 19 478 483 (Pubitemid 34526607)
8. Zubair I, Marcotte MP, Weinstein L, Brost BC. A novel amniocentesis model for learning stereotactic skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 194 846 848 (Pubitemid 43333164)
9. Ville Y, Cooper M, Revel A, Frydman R, Nicolaides KH. Development of a training model for ultrasound-guided invasive procedures in fetal medicine. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: 1995; 5 180 183
10. Nizard J, Duyme M, Ville Y. Teaching ultrasound-guided invasive procedures in fetal medicine: learning curves with and without an electronic guidance system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: 2002; 19 274 277 (Pubitemid 34304575)
11. Wijnberger LD, van der Schouw YT, Christiaens GC. Learning in medicine: chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn: 2000; 20 241 246 (Pubitemid 30168835)
12. Saura R, Gauthier B, Taine L., et al. Operator experience and fetal loss rate in transabdominal CVS. Prenat Diagn: 1994; 14 70 71
13. Boehm FH, Salyer SL, Dev VG, Reed GW. Chorionic villus sampling: quality controla continuous improvement model. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1993; 168 6 Pt 1 1766 1775; discussion 1775-1777