Considerations for evaluating the accuracy of hemoglobin monitoring

Anesthesiology

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 429-430

  O'Reilly, Michael ^a  

^a Masimo Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ACCURACY; BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LETTER; PATIENT CARE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETER; SPINE SURGERY;

ABDOMEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OXIMETRY; PELVIS;

EID: 84864263875     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825d95d6     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Applegate RL 2nd, Barr SJ, Collier CE, Rook JL, Mangus DB, Allard MW: Evaluation of pulse cooximetry in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. Anesthesiology 2011; 116:65-72.
2. Recommendations for reference method for haemoglobinometry in human blood (ICSH standard 1986) and specifications for international haemiglobincyanide reference preparation (3rd edition). International Committee for Standardization in Haematology; Expert Panel on Haemoglobinometry. Clin Lab Haematol 1987; 9:73-9.
3. Takubo T, Tatsumi N, Satoh N, Matsuno K, Fujimoto K, Soga M, Yamagami Y, Akiba S, Sudoh T, Miyazaki M: Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2002; 33 Suppl 2:62-7.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-10.
5. Zwart A, van Assendelft OW, Bull BS, England JM, Lewis SM, Zijlstra WG: Recommendations for reference method for haemoglobinometry in human blood (ICSH standard 1995) and specifications for international haemiglobinocyanide standard (4th edition). J Clin Pathol 1996; 49:271-4.
6. Gehring H, Duembgen L, Peterlein M, Hagelberg S, Dibbelt L: Hemoximetry as the gold standard? Error assessment based on differences among identical blood gas analyzer devices of five manufacturers. Anesth Analg 2007; 105:S24-30.
7. Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Catherine K, Levrat Q, Debaene B, Mimoz O: Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2277-82.
8. Berkow L, Rotolo S, Mirski E: Continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring during complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:1396-402.
9. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM: A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:1180-92.
10. Miller RD, Ward TA, Shiboski SC, Cohen NH: A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:858-63.
11. Lamhaut L, Apriotesei R, Combes X, Lejay M, Carli P, Vivien B: Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue® with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement. Anesthesiology 2011; 115:548-54.
12. Ehrenfeld JM, Henneman JP: Impact of continuous and noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring on intraoperative blood transfusions. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists; October 18, 2010; San Diego, CA