Results of questionable management protocols are inherently questionable

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2536-

  Teboul, Jean Louis ^a,b   Monnet, Xavier ^a,b   Perel, Azriel ^c  

^a Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique Hôpitaux universitaires Paris Sud   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; LETTER; LUNG FLUID; MEDICAL DEVICE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; SHOCK; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION DEVICE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; LUNG WEDGE PRESSURE; MALE; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEPTIC SHOCK;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE; SHOCK; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

EID: 84864259113     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182545759     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Trof RJ, Beishuizen A, Cornet AD, et al: Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1177-1185.
2. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL: Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1:1