Clinical attitudes towards pain treatment post-orthopedic surgery: A multicenter study in Beijing

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 125, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2499-2504

  Wang, Zhi Qiang ^a   Zhan, Si Yan ^b   Fransen, Marlene ^c   Lin, Jian Hao ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (China)

^c GEORGE INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Beijing; Orthopedics; Pain; Post operative; Prevalence

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; BUCINNAZINE; CELECOXIB; DIAZEPAM; DICLOFENAC; FENTANYL; IBUPROFEN; METHIONINE PLUS PARACETAMOL; MIDAZOLAM; MORPHINE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; OXYCODONE; OXYCODONE PLUS PARACETAMOL; PARACETAMOL; PETHIDINE; PHENOBARBITAL; SOMITON; TRAMADOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTIPATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIZZINESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LETHARGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD CHANGE; NAUSEA; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREVALENCE; PRURITUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIDE EFFECT; SOMNOLENCE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOMITING;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHOPEDICS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRES; TRAMADOL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864246757     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.14.019     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lu Q, Gui SQ. The reason, estimation, nursing and prospectation of pain after orthopedics operation. J Clin Med Pract (Chin) 2009; 5: 116-118.
2. Chen Y, Shen XT. The clinical comparison of different demulcent methods post orthopeadic surgery. J Guiyang Med College (Chin) 2005; 30: 415-452.
3. Pan YH. The nursing of patients for postoperative pain. J Clin Med Res 2007; 176: 45-46.
4. Merboth MK, Barnason S. Managing pain: The fifth vital sign. Nurs Clin North Am 2000; 35: 375-383.
5. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 534-540.
6. Kish L. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley. 1965; Reprinted as Wiley Classics Library Edition 1995.
7. Karci A, Taşdöǧen A, Erkin Y, Sahinöz B, Kara H, Elar Z. Evaluation of quality in patient-controlled analgesia provided by an acute pain service. Eur Surg Res 2003; 35: 363-371.
8. Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10: 697-706.
9. Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale: http://www.wongbakerfaces.org/
10. EpiData: A computer programme for entering data and applying validating principles. Jens M. Lauritsen & Michael Bruus. URL http://www.epidata.dk.
11. Gu JR. The comparison of concept, method and standard for identifying medium income community. Mod Econ Res 2005; 10: 10-16.
12. Gan TJ, Lubarsky DA, Flood EM, Thanh T, Mauskopf J, Mayne T, et al. Patient preferences for acute pain treatment. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 681-688.