A study of gender, head circumference and BMI as a variable affecting BAEP results of late teenagers

Indian Journal of Otology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-6

  Solanki, Jayesh D ^a   Joshi, Naisargi ^a   Mehta, Hemant B ^a   Shah, Chinmay J ^a  

^a GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Brainstem auditory evoked potential; Inter peak latencies; Latencies

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; GENDER; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 84864230252     PISSN: 09717749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-7749.98276     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Thomas PB. Clinical use of Neurological Diagnostic Tests. In: Neurology for the Non-neurologist. Weiner WJ, Goetz CG, editors. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999. p. 33-4.
2. Mauguiere F. Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials and Magnetic Stimulation. In: Mohr JP, Gautier JC, editors. In: Guide ton Clinical Neurology. 1st publication, New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 159-60.
3. Thomas JE, Dale Allan JD. Other aids in Neurological Diagnosis. In: Clinical Examination in Neurology: Mayo Clinic. 5th ed, International ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1982. p. 361-3.
4. Katz J. Brainstem evoked responses audiometry. In: Katz J, editor. Hand book of clinical audiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002. p. 47-61.
5. Harinde JS, Ramsarup S, Sharanjit K. The study of age and sex related changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potential. J Clin Diagn Res 2010;4:3495-9.
6. Tafti FM, Gharib K, Teimuri H. Study of age effect on brainstem auditory evoked potential waveforms. J Med Sci 2007;7:1362-5. (Pubitemid 350286012)
7. Sturzebecher E, Werbs M. Effects of age and sex on auditory brain stem response. A new aspect. Scand Audiol 1987;16:153-7. (Pubitemid 18016547)
8. Tandon OP, Krishna SV. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in children-a normative study. Ind Paediatrics 1990;27:737-40.
9. Tandon OP. Brainstem auditory evoked response in healthy north Indians. Indian J Med Res 1990;92:252-6.
10. Celesia GG, Bodis-Wollner I, Chatrian GE, Harding GF, Sokol S, Sperkreijse H. Recommended standards for electroencephalograms and visual evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;87:421-36. (Pubitemid 24012339)
11. Soares Ido A, Menezes Pde L, Carnaúba AT, Pereira LD. Standardization of brainstem auditory evoked potential using a new device. Pro Fono 2010;22:421-6.
12. Michalewski HJ, Thompson LW, Patterson JV, Bowman TE, Litzelman D. Sex differences in the amplitude and latencies of the human auditory brain stem potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980;48:351-6. (Pubitemid 10144868)
13. Lakshmi J, Susheela V, Krishnamurthy N, Madanmohan, Tanja HC. Influence of gender on brainstem auditory evoked potential. J Clin Diagn Res 2000;20:67-72. (Pubitemid 32114457)
14. Rozhkov VP, Soroko SI. Age and sex related differences in brainstem auditory evoked potential in secondary school children living in Northern European Russia. Bio med and Life science Hum Physiol 2009;35:707-13.
15. Rosenhall U, Bjorkman G, Pederson K, Kall A. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in different age groups. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:426-30. (Pubitemid 16230709)
16. Allison T, Wood CC, Goff WR. Brain stem auditory, patternreversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:619-36. (Pubitemid 13099638)
17. Masaru A, Yoshinori K, Juichi Y, Teruo K, Yutaka S, Yoshio K. Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of Brain Stem auditory Evoked Response. Audiology 1990;29:107-12.
18. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Coupland SG, Winkelaar R. The relation between head size and auditory brain-stem response interpeak latency maturation. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:2149-58. (Pubitemid 23307671)
19. Rawool VW. The Aging Auditory System, Part 1: Controversy and Confusion on Slower Processing. The Hearing Review. Jul 2007.
20. Dehan CP, Jerger J. Analysis of gender differences in the auditory brainstem response. Laryngoscope 1990;100:18-24. (Pubitemid 20020491)
21. Meij BP, Venkerc-van Haagen AJ, van der Brom WE. Relationship between latency of brainstem auditory-evoked potentials and head size in dogs. Vet Q 1992;14:121-6.
22. Dennis RT, Curt M, Davis SP. The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brain stem response. Hear Res 1990;32:165-74.