The interactive brain hypothesis

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUNE 2012, 2012, Pages

  Di Paolo, Ezequiel ^a,b,c   De Jaegher, Hanne ^b,c  

^a BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Enaction; Interactive brain hypothesis; Participatory sense making; Readiness to interact; Social interaction; Transitions in coordination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPREHENSION; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERACTIVE BRAIN HYPOTHESIS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PHENOMENOLOGY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL STRUCTURE;

EID: 84864227936     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., and Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment. New Ideas Psychol. 27, 32-47.
2. Auvray, M., and Rohde, M. (in press). Perceptual crossing: the simplest online paradigm. Front. Hum. Neurosci.
3. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mind-blindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
5. Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., and Weakland, J. (1956). Towards a theory of schizophrenia. Behav. Sci. 1, 251-264.
6. Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domination. New York, NY: Pantheon.
7. Bennett, M. R., and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
8. Blakemore, S. J., and Frith, U. (2004). How does the brain deal with the social world? Neuroreport 15, 119-128.
9. Brüne, M. (2003). "Social cognition and behaviour in schizophrenia," in The Social Brain: Evolution and Pathology, eds M. Brüne, H. Ribbert, and W. Schiefenhövel (Chichester: Wiley), 277-314.
10. Bullowa, M. (ed.). (1979). Before Speech. The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Burns, J. (2006). The social brain hypothesis of schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 5, 77-81.
12. Castiello, U., Becchio, C., Zoia, S., Nelini, C., Sartori, L., Blason, L., D'Ottavio, G., Bulgheroni, M., and Gallese V. (2010). Wired to be social: the ontogeny of human interaction. PLoS ONE 5:e13199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013199
13. Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., and Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr. Biol. 16, 1905-1910.
14. Carpendale, J. I. M., and Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: the development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 79-151.
15. Carruthers, P. (2009). Mindreading underlies metacognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 32, 164-182.
16. Catmur, C., Gillmeister, H., Bird, G., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., and Heyes, C. (2008). Through the looking glass: counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 1208-1215.
17. Catmur, C., Mars, R., Rushworth, M., and Heyes, C. (2011). Making mirrors: premotor cortex stimulation enhances mirror and counter-mirror motor facilitation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 2352-2362.
18. Catmur, C., Walsh, V., and Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Curr. Biol. 17, 1527-1531.
19. Catmur, C., Walsh, V., and Heyes, C. (2009). Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 2369-2380.
20. Cook, R., Press, C., Dickinson, A., and Heyes, C. (2010). Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 840-852.
21. Cosmelli, D., and Thompson, D. (2010). "Embodiment or envat-ment? Reflections on the bodily basis of consciousness," in Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, eds J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. Di Paolo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 361-385.
22. Cummins, F. (2011). Periodic and aperiodic synchronization in skilled action. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:170. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00170
23. David, N., Aumann, C., Santos, N. S., Bewernick, B. H., Eickhoff, S. B., Albert Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., and Vogeley, K. (2008). Differential involvement of the posterior temporal cortex in mentaliz-ing but not perspective taking. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 3, 279-289.
24. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Conscious. Cogn. 18, 535-542.
25. De Jaegher, H., and Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenom. Cogn. Sci. 6, 485-507.
26. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., and Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 441-447.
27. Dennett, D. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
28. Del Giudice, M., Manera, V., and Keysers, C. (2009). Programmed to learn? The ontogeny of mirror neurons. Dev. Sci. 12, 350-363.
29. Di Paolo, E. (2000). Behavioural coordination, structural congruence and entrainment in a simulation of acoustically coupled agents. Adaptive Behav. 8, 27-48.
30. Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 4, 97-125.
31. Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., and Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas Psychol. 26, 278-294.
32. Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., and De Jaegher, H. (2010). "Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play," in Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, eds J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. A. Di Paolo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 33-87.
33. Dietrich, S., Hertrich, I., Alter, K., Ischebeck, A., and Ackermann, H. (2007). Semiotic aspects of nonverbal vocalizations: a functional imaging study. Neuroreport 18, 1891-1894.
34. Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., and Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLoS ONE 5, 278-288. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0012166
35. Ebisch, S. J., Aureli, T., Bafunno, D., Cardone, D., Romani, G. L., and Merla, A. (2012). Mother and child in synchrony: thermal facial imprints of autonomic contagion. Biol. Psychol. 89, 123-129.
36. Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygoskian about theory of mind: mediation, dialogue and the development of social understanding. Dev. Rev. 28, 225-262.
37. Ferrari, P. F., Rozzi, S., and Fogassi, L. (2005). Mirror neuron responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral pre-motor cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 212-226.
38. Forbes, C. E., and Grafman, J. (2010). The role of the human prefrontal cortex in social cognition and moral judgment. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 299-324.
39. Frith, C. D. (2008). Social cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 2033-2029.
40. Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Curr. Biol. 17, R724-R732.
41. Froese, T., and Di Paolo, E. (2010). Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: an investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connect. Sci. 22, 43-68.
42. Froese, T., Lenay, C., and Ikegami, T. (in press). Imitation by interaction: a new proposal based on the dynamics and phenomenology of social interaction. Front. Hum. Neurosci.
43. Fuchs, T. (2011). The brain-a mediating organ. J. Conscious. Stud. 18, 196-221.
44. Fujii, N., Hihara, S., and Iriki, A. (2007). Dynamic social adaptation of motion-related neurons in primate parietal cortex. PLoS ONE 2:e397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0000397
45. Gallagher, S. (2008a). Inference or interaction: social cognition without precursors. Philos. Explor. 11, 163-173.
46. Gallagher, S. (2008b). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 535-543.
47. Gallagher, S. (in press). In defense of phenomenological approaches to social cognition: interacting with the critics. Rev. Philos. Psychol.
48. Gallese, V., Rochat, M., Cossu, G., and Sinigaglia, C. (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of intentional understanding. Dev. Psychol. 45, 103-113.
49. Gallese, V., and Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 512-519.
50. Garfield, J. L., Peterson, C. C., and Perry, T. (2001). Social cognition, language acquisition and the development of theory of mind. Mind Lang. 16, 494-541.
51. Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
52. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
53. Gergely, G., and Watson, J. S. (1999). "Early socio-emotional development: contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model," in Early Social Cognition, ed P. Rochat (Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum), 101-137.
54. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York, NY: The Free Press.
55. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Studies in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
56. Goldman, A., and de Vignemont, F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 154-159.
57. Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P., and West, M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling: testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8030-8035.
58. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
59. Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 253-261.
60. Heyes, C. (2010). Where do mirror neurons come from? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 575-583.
61. Herschbach, M. (in press). On the role of social interaction in social cognition: a mechanistic alternative to enactivism. Phenom. Cogn. Sci.
62. Hobson, R. P. (2002). The Cradle of Thought. London, Macmillan.
63. Hurley, S., and Chater, N. (2005a). Perspectives on Imitation. Volume 1: Mechanisms of Imitation and Imitation in Animals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Hurley, S., and Chater, N. (2005b). Perspectives on Imitation. Volume 2: Imitation, Human Development and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Issartel, J., Marin, L., and Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal coordination: 'Can we march to the beat of our own drum'? Neurosci. Lett. 411, 174-179.
66. Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L., and Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of Dialogue in Infancy: Coordinated Timing in Development. Oxford: Blackwell.
67. Järverläinen, J., Schürmann, M., and Hari, R. (2004). Activation of the human primary motor cortex during observation of tool use. Neuroimage 23, 187-192.
68. Jordan, J. S. (2009). Forward-looking aspects of perception-action coupling as a basis for embodied communication. Discourse Process. 46, 127-144.
69. Kampe, K. K. W., Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. (2003). "Hey John": signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with "mental-izing," regardless of modality. J. Neurosci. 23, 5258-5263.
70. Kello, C. T., Brown, G. D. A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Holden, J. G., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Rhodes, T., and van Orden, G. C. (2010). Scaling laws in cognitive sciences. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 223-232.
71. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Kelso, J. A. S. (2009a). "Synergies: atoms of brain and behavior," in Progress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed D. Sternad (New York, NY: Springer), 83-91.
73. Kelso, J. A. S. (2009b). "Coordination Dynamics," in Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, ed R. A. Meyers (Springer: Heidelberg), 1537-1564.
74. Kelso, J. A. S., de Guzman, G. C., Reveley, C., and Tognoli, E. (2009). Virtual partner interaction (VPI): exploring novel behaviors via coordination dynamics. PLoS ONE 4:e5749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0005749
75. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Keysers, C., and Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: a hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 501-507.
77. Kobayashi, C., Glover, G. H., and Temple, E. (2007). Cultural and linguistic effects on neural bases of 'theory of mind' in american and japanese children. Brain Res. 1164, 95-107.
78. Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., and Frith, C. (2010). Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 2220-2230.
79. Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., and Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: susceptibility to others' beliefs in human infants and adults. Science 330, 1830-1834.
80. Lagarde, J., and Kelson, J. A. S. (2006). Binding of movement, sound and touch: multimodal coordination dynamics. Exp. Brain Res. 173, 673-688.
81. Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Giampietro, V. P., Surguladze, S., Brammer, M. J., and Davis, A. S. (2006). The role of "shared representations" in social perception and empathy: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 29, 1173-1184.
82. Lenay, C., and Stewart, J. (2012). A minimalist approach to perceptual interactions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:98. doi: 10.3389/fnhum. 2012.00098
83. Lepage, J. F., and Théoret, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system: grasping other's actions from birth? Dev. Sci. 10, 513-529.
84. Lindenberger, U., Li, S., Gruber, W., and Müller, V. (2009). Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neurosci. 10, 22.
85. Lotze, M., Heymans, U., Birbaumer, N., Veit, R., Erb, M., Flor, H., and Halsband, U. (2006). Differential cerebral activation during observation of expressive gestures and motor acts. Neuropsychologia 44, 1787-1795.
86. McFarland, D. H. (2001). Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 44, 128-143.
87. McGann, M., and De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: enacting social perception. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 8, 417-437.
88. Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., and Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 320-339.
89. Meltzoff, A. N., and Moore, M. K. (1998). "Infant intersubjectivity: broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity and intention," in Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, ed S. Braten (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 47-62.
90. Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., and Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: a meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Dev. 78, 622-646.
91. Müller, V., and Lindenberger, U. (2011). Cardiac and respiratory patterns synchronize between persons during choir singing. PLoS ONE 6:e24893. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0024893
92. Murray, L., and Trevarthen, C. (1985). "Emotional regulations of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers," in Social Perception in Infants, eds T. M. Field and N. A. Fox (Norwood: Alex), 177-197.
93. Nadel, J., Carchon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D., and Réserbat-Plantey, D. (1999). Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Dev. Sci. 2, 164-173.
94. Naeem, M., Prasad, G., Watson, D. R., and Kelso, J. A. S. (2012). Electrophysiological signatures of intentional social coordination in the 10-12 Hz range. Neuroimage 59, 1795-1803.
95. Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M., and Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 817-818.
96. Noy, L., Dekel, E., and Alon, U. (2011). The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 20947-20952.
97. Onishi, K. H., and Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308, 255-258.
98. O'Neill, D. K. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Develop. 67, 659-677.
99. O'Regan, J., and Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 939-1031.
100. Oullier, O., de Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., and Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: measuring human bonding. Soc. Neurosci. 3, 178-192.
101. Pfeiffer, U. J., Timmermans, B., Bente, G., Vogeley, K., and Schilbach, L. (2011). A non-verbal Turing test: differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction. PLoS ONE 6:e27591. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0027591
102. Pönkänen, L. M., Alhoniemi, A., Leppänen, J. M., and Hietanen, J. K. (2011). Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6, 486-494.
103. Quinn, M., Smith, L., Mayley, G., and Husbands, P. (2003). Evolving controllers for a homogeneous system of physical robots: structured cooperation with minimal sensors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361, 2321-2343.
104. Racine, T., and Carpendale, J. I. M. (2007). The role of shared practice in joint attention. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 25, 3-25.
105. Ramseyer, F., and Tschascher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body-movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 79, 284-295.
106. Ray, E., and Heyes, C. (2011). Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. Dev. Sci. 14, 92-105.
107. Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D., and Saxe, R. (2010). Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: a new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage 50, 1639-1647.
108. Reddy, V. (2003). On being the object of attention: implications for self- other consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 397-402.
109. Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
110. Reddy, V., and Morris, P. (2004). Participants don't need theories: knowing minds in engagement. Theory Psychol. 14, 647-665.
111. Reed, K., Peshkin, M., Hartmann, M. J., Grabowecky, M., Patton, J., and Vishton, P. M. (2006). Haptically linked dyads: are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol. Sci. 17, 365-366.
112. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R., Goodman, J., and Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26, 867-891.
113. Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Schokley, K., and Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal synergies. Front. Psychol. 2:38. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00038
114. Rochat, P., Neisser, U., and Marian, V. (1998). Are young infants sensitive to interpersonal contingency? Infant. Behav. Dev. 21, 355-366.
115. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696-735.
116. Santiesteban, I., White, S., Cook, J., Gilbert, S. J., Heyes, C., and Bird, G. (2012). Training social cognition: from imitation to theory of mind. Cognition 122, 228-235.
117. Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., and Castiello, U. (2011). Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 557-568.
118. Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Kraemer, N. C., Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., and Vogeley, K. (2006). Being with virtual others: neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia 44, 718-730.
119. Schmidt, R. C., and O'Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecol. Psychol. 9, 189-206.
120. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., and Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 70-76.
121. Senju, A., and Johnson, M. H. (2009). The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 127-134.
122. Shergill, S. S., Bays, P. M., Frith, C. D., and Wolpert, D. M. (2003). Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation. Science 301, 187.
123. Shimada, S., and Hiraki, K. (2006). Infant's brain responses to live and televised action. Neuroimage 32, 930-939.
124. Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 305-319.
125. Singer, T., Wolpert, D. M., and Frith, C. D. (2003). "Introduction: the study of social interactions," in The Neuroscience of Social Interaction: Decoding, Imitating, and Influencing the Actions of Others, eds C. D. Frith and D. M Wolpert (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 13-27.
126. Song, H. J., Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., and Fisher, C. (2008). Can an agent's false belief be corrected by an appropriate communication? Psychological reasoning in 18-month-old infants. Cognition 109, 295-315.
127. Southgate, V., Chevallier, C., and Csibra, G. (2010). Seventeen-month-olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others' referential communication. Dev. Sci. 13, 907-912.
128. Stone, J. E., Carpendale, J. I. M., Sugarman, J., and Martin, J. (2012). A meadian account of social understanding: taking a non-mentalistic approach to infant and verbal false belief understanding. New Ideas Psychol. 30, 166-178.
129. Surian, L., Caldi, S., and Sperber, D. (2007). Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychol. Sci. 18, 580-586.
130. Symons, D. K. (2004). Mental state discourse, theory of mind, and the internalization of self-other understanding. Dev. Rev. 24, 159-188.
131. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
132. Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C., and Kelso, J. A. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 8190-8195.
133. Trevarthen, C.B. (1979). "Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity," in Before Speech, ed M. Bullowa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 321-348.
134. Trevarthen, C. B. (2005). First things first: infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitation, without reason or language. J. Child Psychother. 31, 91-113.
135. Trevarthen, C. B., and Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: research, theory, and clinical applications. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 42, 3-48.
136. Tucker, M., and Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis. Cogn. 8, 769-800.
137. Tylén, K., Wallentin, M., and Roepstorff, A. (2009). Say it with flowers! An fMRI study of object mediated communication. Brain Lang. 108, 159-166.
138. van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., and Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 331-350.
139. van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., and Turvey, M. T. (2005). Human cognition and 1/f scaling. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134, 117-123.
140. Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 829-858.
141. van Schie, H. T., van Waterschoot, B. M., and Bekkering, H. (2008). Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 1493-1500.
142. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
143. Varlet, M., Marin, L., Lagarde, J., and Bardy, B. G. (2011). Social postural coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 473-483.
144. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., and Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
145. Wolf, I., Dziobek, I., and Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Neural correlates of social cognition in naturalistic settings: a model-free analysis approach. Neuroimage 49, 894-904.