Minimal Flavour Violation with strong Higgs dynamics

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Alonso, R ^a   Gavela, M B ^a   Merlo, L ^b   Rigolin, S ^c   Yepes, J ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA TEÓRICA UAM CSIC   (Spain)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Higgs physics; Quark masses and SM parameters; Technicolor and composite models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864211004     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2012)076     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ALEPH, CDF, D0, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD collaboration, J. Alcaraz, Precision electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model, arXiv:0911.2604.
2. ATLAS collaboration, Update of the combination of Higgs boson searches in pp collisions at √s = 7TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2011-135 (2011).
3. ATLAS collaboration, Combination of Higgs Boson Searches with up to 4.9 fb-1 of pp Collisions Data Taken at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2011-163 (2011).
4. CMS collaboration, Combination of Higgs searches, PAS-HIG-11-022 (2011).
5. CMS collaboration, Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to τ pairs in pp collisions at √s = 7TeV, PAS-HIG-11-029 (2011).
6. J. van der Bij, The minimal non-minimal standard model, Phys. Lett. B 636 (2006) 56 [hep-ph/0603082].
7. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs scalars, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 187.
8. M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Anatomy of a composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 254 (1985) 299.
9. G. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164].
10. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. II, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 246.
11. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. I, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345.
12. T. Appelquist and C.W. Bernard, Strongly interacting Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 200.
13. A.C. Longhitano, Low-energy impact of a heavy Higgs boson sector, Nucl. Phys. B 188 (1981) 118.
14. A.C. Longhitano, Heavy Higgs bosons in the Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1166.
15. G. D'Ambrosio, G. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal avor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036].
16. M. Redi and A. Weiler, Flavor and CP invariant composite Higgs models, JHEP 11 (2011) 108 [arXiv:1106.6357].
17. G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez, Flavor physics constraints for physics beyond the standard model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 355 [arXiv:1002.0900].
18. R. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440.
19. R. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791.
20. T. Feldmann, M. Jung and T. Mannel, Sequential flavour symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 033003 [arXiv:0906.1523].
21. R. Alonso, M. Gavela, L. Merlo and S. Rigolin, On the scalar potential of minimal flavour violation, JHEP 07 (2011) 012 [arXiv:1103.2915].
22. G. Colangelo, E. Nikolidakis and C. Smith, Supersymmetric models with minimal flavour violation and their running, Eur. Phys. J. C 59 (2009) 75 [arXiv:0807.0801].
23. L. Mercolli and C. Smith, EDM constraints on avored CP-violating phases, Nucl. Phys. B 817 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.1949].
24. A.L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, General minimal avor violation, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 076002 [arXiv:0903.1794].
25. J. Ellis, J.S. Lee and A. Pilaftsis, A geometric approach to CP-violation: applications to the MCPMFV SUSY model, JHEP 10 (2010) 049 [arXiv:1006.3087].
26. R. Alonso, M. Gavela, L. Merlo, S. Rigolin and J. Yepes, in preparation.
27. T. Feldmann and T. Mannel, Large top mass and non-linear representation of flavour symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 171601 [arXiv:0801.1802].
28. T. Appelquist, M.J. Bowick, E. Cohler and A.I. Hauser, The breaking of isospin symmetry in theories with a dynamical Higgs mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 1676.
29. G. Cvetič and R. Kogerler, Fermionic couplings in an electroweak theory with nonlinear spontaneous symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989) 342.
30. D. Espriu and J. Manzano, CP violation and family mixing in the effective electroweak lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 073008 [hep-ph/0011036].
31. L. Susskind, Dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Weinberg-Salam theory, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2619.
32. S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind, Mass without scalars, Nucl. Phys. B 155 (1979) 237.
33. K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, A custodial symmetry for Zbb̄, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 62 [hep-ph/0605341].
34. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021.
35. T. Hurth, G. Isidori, J.F. Kamenik and F. Mescia, Constraints on new physics in MFV models: a model-independent analysis of ΔF = 1 processes, Nucl. Phys. B 808 (2009) 326 [arXiv:0807.5039].
36. J. Laiho, E. Lunghi and R.S. Van de Water, Lattice QCD inputs to the CKM unitarity triangle analysis, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034503 [arXiv:0910.2928].
37. G. Isidori and P. Paradisi, Hints of large tan β in flavour physics, Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 499 [hep-ph/0605012].
38. -1 of pp̄ collisions, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 052007 [arXiv:1106.6308].
39. A. Lenz, Theoretical status of the CKM matrix, arXiv:1108.1218.
40. K. Chetyrkin et al., Charm and bottom quark masses: an update, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 074010 [arXiv:0907.2110].
41. 0 mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark, Nucl. Phys. B 347 (1990) 491.
42. 0 mixing with an extended Higgs sector, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 40 [hep-ph/9710245].
43. s mixing phase at CDF, PoS(ICHEP 2010)236 [arXiv:1012.0962].
44. -1 of pp̄ collisions, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 032006 [arXiv:1109.3166].
45. T. Blum et al., The K → (ππ)I=2 decay amplitude from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 141601 [arXiv:1111.1699].
46. P. Koppenburg Heavy flavour results at the LHC, talk at Physics in collision 2011, August 28-September 1, Vancouver, Canada (2011).
47. A.J. Buras and D. Guadagnoli, Correlations among new CP-violating effects in ΔF = 2 observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033005 [arXiv:0805.3887].
48. K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 121801 [arXiv:1108.2036].
49. K at next-to-next-to-leading order: the charm-top-quark contribution, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 094026 [arXiv:1007.0684].
50. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964.
51. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381.
52. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaboration, Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008].
53. s mixing, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 031501 [arXiv:1106.3200].
54. T. Appelquist, M.J. Bowick, E. Cohler and A.I. Hauser, Isospin symmetry breaking in electroweak theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 1523.
55. A. De Rujula, M. Gavela, P. Hernández and E. Masso, The selfcouplings of vector bosons: Does LEP-1 obviate LEP-2?, Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 3.
56. F. Feruglio, A. Masiero and L. Maiani, Low-energy effects of heavy chiral fermions, Nucl. Phys. B 387 (1992) 523.
57. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, A. Lenz and U. Nierste, CP asymmetry in avor specific B decays beyond leading logarithms, Phys. Lett. B 576 (2003) 173 [hep-ph/0307344].