Precision on leptonic mixing parameters at future neutrino oscillation experiments

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Coloma, P ^a   Donini, A ^b,c   Fernandez Martinez E ^d   Hernandez P ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^d CERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

CP violation; Neutrino physics; Standard model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864210483     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2012)073     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. DAYA-BAY collaboration, F. An et al., Observation of electron- antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 171803 [arXiv:1203.1669].
2. T2K collaboration, K. Abe et al., Indication of electron neutrino appearance from an accelerator-produced off-axis muon neutrino beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 041801 [arXiv:1106.2822].
3. DOUBLE-CHOOZ collaboration, Y. Abe et al., Indication for the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos in the double CHOOZ experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 131801 [arXiv:1112.6353].
4. MINOS collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Improved search for muon-neutrino to electron-neutrino oscillations in MINOS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 181802 [arXiv:1108.0015].
5. 13 >0, JHEP 04 (2010) 056 [arXiv:1001.4524].
6. 13 >0 from global neutrino data analysis, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 053007 [arXiv:1106.6028].
7. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis without grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 45.
8. ISS Physics Working Group collaboration, A. Bandyopadhyay et al., Physics at a future neutrino factory and super-beam facility, Rept. Prog. Phys. 72 (2009) 106201 [arXiv:0710.4947].
9. S. Geer, Neutrino beams from muon storage rings: characteristics and physics potential, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6989 [Erratum ibid. D 59 (1999) 039903] [hep-ph/9712290].
10. A. De Rujula, M. Gavela and P. Hernández, Neutrino oscillation physics with a neutrino factory, Nucl. Phys. B 547 (1999) 21 [hep-ph/9811390].
11. M. Apollonio, A. Blondel, A. Broncano, M. Bonesini, J. Bouchez, et al., Oscillation physics with a neutrino factory, hep-ph/0210192.
12. J. Gomez-Cadenas and D.A. Harris, Physics opportunities at neutrino factories, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52 (2002) 253.
13. P. Zucchelli, A novel concept for a anti-nu/e/nu/e neutrino factory: the β beam, Phys. Lett. B 532 (2002) 166.
14. IDS-NF collaboration, S. Choubey et al., International design study for the neutrino factory, interim design report, arXiv:1112.2853.
15. P. Huber, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Resolving parameter degeneracies in long-baseline experiments by atmospheric neutrino data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 053006 [hep-ph/0501037].
16. J.-E. Campagne, M. Maltoni, M. Mezzetto and T. Schwetz, Physics potential of the CERN-MEMPHYS neutrino oscillation project, JHEP 04 (2007) 003 [hep-ph/0603172].
17. 22 with a massive magnetized detector for atmospheric neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 24 (2002) 43 [hep-ph/0202232].
18. 13 and neutrino mass hierarchy, Nucl. Phys. B 669 (2003) 255 [hep-ph/0305152].
19. 13 neutrino mass hierarchy and iron magnetized detectors, Nucl. Phys. B 712 (2005) 392 [hep-ph/0406096].
20. D. Indumathi and M. Murthy, A question of hierarchy: matter effects with atmospheric neutrinos and anti-neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 013001 [hep-ph/0407336].
21. S. Petcov and T. Schwetz, Determining the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 740 (2006) 1 [hep-ph/0511277].
22. INO collaboration, V. Arumugam et al., India-based Neutrino Observatory: interim project report. Vol. 1.
23. A. Samanta, The mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos at INO, Phys. Lett. B 673 (2009) 37 [hep-ph/0610196].
24. R. Gandhi, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami, P. Mehta, S.U. Sankar, et al., Mass hierarchy determination via future atmospheric neutrino detectors, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 073012 [arXiv:0707.1723].
25. O. Mena, I. Mocioiu and S. Razzaque, Neutrino mass hierarchy extraction using atmospheric neutrinos in ice, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 093003 [arXiv:0803.3044].
26. R. Gandhi, P. Ghoshal, S. Goswami and S.U. Sankar, Resolving the mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos using a liquid argon detector, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 073001 [arXiv:0807.2759].
27. A. Samanta, Discrimination of mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos at a magnetized muon detector, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 037302 [arXiv:0907.3540].
28. M. Blennow and T. Schwetz, Identifying the neutrino mass ordering with INO and NOvA, arXiv:1203.3388.
29. W. Winter, Understanding CP phase dependent measurements at neutrino superbeams in terms of bi-rate graphs, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 033006 [hep-ph/0310307].
30. P. Huber, M. Lindner and W. Winter, From parameter space constraints to the precision determination of the leptonic Dirac CP phase, JHEP 05 (2005) 020 [hep-ph/0412199].
31. P. Huber, M. Lindner and W. Winter, Simulation of long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES (general long baseline experiment simulator), Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195 [hep-ph/0407333].
32. P. Huber, J. Kopp, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec and W. Winter, New features in the simulation of neutrino oscillation experiments with GLoBES 3.0: general long baseline experiment simulator, Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432 [hep-ph/0701187].
33. LBNE collaboration, T. Akiri et al., The 2010 interim report of the long-baseline neutrino experiment collaboration physics working groups, arXiv:1110.6249.
34. CERN working group on Super Beams collaboration, J.J. Gomez-Cadenas et al., Physics potential of very intense conventional neutrino beams, hep-ph/0105297.
35. 13 and δCP sensitivities of the SPL-Frejus project revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 45 (2006) 643 [hep-ex/0411062].
36. A. Longhin, A new design for the CERN-Fréjus neutrino super beam, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1745 [arXiv:1106.1096].
37. LAGUNA collaboration, D. Angus et al., The LAGUNA design study- towards giant liquid based underground detectors for neutrino physics and astrophysics and proton decay searches, arXiv:1001.0077.
38. T2K collaboration, Y. Itow et al., The JHF-Kamioka neutrino project, hep-ex/0106019.
39. K. Nakamura, Hyper-Kamiokande: a next generation water Cherenkov detector, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 (2003) 4053.
40. K. Abe, T. Abe, H. Aihara, Y. Fukuda, Y. Hayato, et al., Letter of intent: the Hyper-Kamiokande experiment - Detector design and physics potential - arXiv:1109.3262.
41. A. Donini, E. Fernandez-Martinez and S. Rigolin, Appearance and disappearance signals at a beta-beam and a super-beam facility, Phys. Lett. B 621 (2005) 276 [hep-ph/0411402].
42. 13 and δ, Eur. Phys. J. C 45 (2006) 73 [hep-ph/0506100].
43. J. Burguet-Castell, D. Casper, J. Gomez-Cadenas, P. Hernández and F. Sanchez, Neutrino oscillation physics with a higher γβ beam, Nucl. Phys. B 695 (2004) 217 [hep-ph/0312068].
44. J. Burguet-Castell, D. Casper, E. Couce, J. Gomez-Cadenas and P. Hernández, Optimal beta-beam at the CERN-SPS, Nucl. Phys. B 725 (2005) 306 [hep-ph/0503021].
45. M. Mezzetto, Physics reach of the β beam, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 1771 [hep-ex/0302007].
46. A. Donini, E. Fernandez-Martinez, P. Migliozzi, S. Rigolin and L. Scotto Lavina, Study of the eightfold degeneracy with a standard beta-beam and a super-beam facility, Nucl. Phys. B 710 (2005) 402 [hep-ph/0406132].
47. M. Mezzetto, Beta beams, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 143 (2005) 309 [hep-ex/0410083].
48. P. Huber, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec and W. Winter, Physics and optimization of beta-beams: from low to very high γ Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 053002 [hep-ph/0506237].
49. E. Fernandez-Martinez, The γ 100 beta-beam revisited, Nucl. Phys. B 833 (2010) 96 [arXiv:0912.3804].
50. S.K. Agarwalla, A. Raychaudhuri and A. Samanta, Exploration prospects of a long baseline β beam neutrino experiment with an iron calorimeter detector, Phys. Lett. B 629 (2005) 33 [hep-ph/0505015].
51. A. Donini, E. Fernandez-Martinez, P. Migliozzi, S. Rigolin, L. Scotto Lavina, et al., A β beam complex based on the machine upgrades of the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 48 (2006) 787 [hep-ph/0604229].
52. C. Volpe, Topical review on beta-beams, J. Phys. G 34 (2007) R1 [hep-ph/0605033].
53. 13 with a MAGIC baseline beta-beam experiment, Nucl. Phys. B 771 (2007) 1 [hep-ph/0610333].
54. A. Donini, E. Fernandez-Martinez, P. Migliozzi, S. Rigolin, L.S. Lavina, et al., Neutrino hierarchy from CP-blind observables with high density magnetized detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 599 [hep-ph/0703209].
55. A. Jansson, O. Mena, S.J. Parke and N. Saoulidou, Combining CPT-conjugate neutrino channels at Fermilab, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 053002 [arXiv:0711.1075].
56. S.K. Agarwalla, S. Choubey and A. Raychaudhuri, Unraveling neutrino parameters with a magical beta-beam experiment at INO, Nucl. Phys. B 798 (2008) 124 [arXiv:0711.1459].
57. 13 δ and the neutrino mass hierarchy at a γ 350 double baseline Li/B beta-beam, JHEP 05 (2008) 050 [arXiv:0712.0796].
58. D. Meloni, O. Mena, C. Orme, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli, An intermediate γbeta-beam neutrino experiment with long baseline, JHEP 07 (2008) 115 [arXiv:0802.0255].
59. S.K. Agarwalla, S. Choubey, A. Raychaudhuri and W. Winter, Optimizing the greenéld beta-beam, JHEP 06 (2008) 090 [arXiv:0802.3621].
60. S.K. Agarwalla, S. Choubey and A. Raychaudhuri, Exceptional sensitivity to neutrino parameters with a two baseline beta-beam set-up, Nucl. Phys. B 805 (2008) 305 [arXiv:0804.3007].
61. 13, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 037101 [arXiv:0804.4000].
62. 13, PoS NUFACT08 (2008) 036 [arXiv:0809.3890].
63. S. Choubey, P. Coloma, A. Donini and E. Fernandez-Martinez, Optimized two-baseline beta-beam experiment, JHEP 12 (2009) 020 [arXiv:0907.2379].
64. P. Coloma, A. Donini, P. Migliozzi, L. Scotto Lavina and F. Terranova, A minimal β beam with high-q ions to address CP-violation in the leptonic sector, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1674 [arXiv:1004.3773].
65. J. Burguet-Castell, M. Gavela, J. Gomez-Cadenas, P. Hernández and O. Mena, On the measurement of leptonic CP-violation, Nucl. Phys. B 608 (2001) 301 [hep-ph/0103258].
66. P. Huber and W. Winter, Neutrino factories and the 'magic' baseline, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 037301 [hep-ph/0301257].
67. 13, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 093001 [hep-ph/0701258].
68. 13, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 093012 [arXiv:0709.3889].
69. E. Fernandez Martinez, T. Li, S. Pascoli and O. Mena, Improvement of the low energy neutrino factory, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 073010 [arXiv:0911.3776].
70. S.K. Agarwalla, P. Huber, J. Tang and W. Winter, Optimization of the neutrino factory, revisited, JHEP 01 (2011) 120 [arXiv:1012.1872].
71. 13 perturbation theory of neutrino oscillation for long-baseline experiments, JHEP 06 (2011) 022 [arXiv:1103.4387].
72. A. Cervera, A. Donini, M. Gavela, J. Gomez Cadenas, P. Hernández, et al., Golden measurements at a neutrino factory, Nucl. Phys. B 579 (2000) 17 [Erratum ibid. B 593 (2001) 731-732] [hep-ph/0002108].
73. M. Freund, P. Huber and M. Lindner, Systematic exploration of the neutrino factory parameter space including errors and correlations, Nucl. Phys. B 615 (2001) 331 [hep-ph/0105071].
74. E.K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson and T. Schwetz, Series expansions for three avor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter, JHEP 04 (2004) 078 [hep-ph/0402175].
75. T. Schwetz, M. Tortola and J. Valle, Global neutrino data and recent reactor uxes: status of three-avour oscillation parameters, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 063004 [arXiv:1103.0734].
76. A.M. Dziewonski and D.L. Anderson, Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 25 (1981) 297.
77. A. Donini, D. Meloni and S. Rigolin, Clone ow analysis for a theory inspired neutrino experiment planning, JHEP 06 (2004) 011 [hep-ph/0312072].
78. M. Bishai, M. Diwan, S. Kettell, J. Stewart, B. Viren, et al., Neutrino oscillations in the precision era, arXiv:1203.4090.
79. P. Huber, M. Lindner, T. Schwetz and W. Winter, First hint for CP-violation in neutrino oscillations from upcoming superbeam and reactor experiments, JHEP 11 (2009) 044 [arXiv:0907.1896].
80. NOvA collaboration, D. Ayres et al., NOvA: proposal to build a 30 kiloton off-axis detector to study ν(μ) → ν(e) oscillations in the NuMI beamline, hep-ex/0503053.
81. μ disappearance in a totally active version of NoVA detector, Off-Axis-Note-SIM-30.
82. e dans l'experiénce T2K depuis l'étude des données recueilles dans l'éxperience K2K, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris VI, Paris France (2006).
83. I. Kato, Neutrino 2008, T2K-TALK-001, http://www.t2k.org/docs/talk/index- html (2008).
84. P. Huber, M. Lindner and W. Winter, Superbeams versus neutrino factories, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 3 [hep-ph/0204352].
85. M. Ishitsuka, T. Kajita, H. Minakata and H. Nunokawa, Resolving neutrino mass hierarchy and CP degeneracy by two identical detectors with different baselines, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 033003 [hep-ph/0504026].
86. M. Bishai, private communication.
87. L. Whitehead, private communication.
88. A. Longhin, Optimization of neutrino uxes for European super-beams, PoS ICHEP2010 (2010) 325.
89. 13, arXiv:1109.6526.
90. F. Di Lodovico, Update WP5 LAr working group, talk at the general LAGUNA meeting, Paris France (2012).
91. A.B. Laing, Optimisation of detectors for the golden channel at a neutrino factory, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Galsgow, Glasgow U.K. (2008).