Corporate governance of nonprofit organizations: Cooperation and control

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 28, Issue 9-10, 2005, Pages 857-867

  Siebart, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boards; Control; Cooperation; Governance; Limits of institutional economics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864209003     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-200067375     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Taylor, B., Chait, R., and Holland, T., 1996. The New Work of the Nonprofit Board. Harvard Business Review, 74: 9ff (Sept–Oct), Reprint 96509[CSA]
2. Fama, E., and Jensen, M., 1982. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 310–25. [CSA]
3. Eberl, P., 2002. Organisatorische Veränderung und Corporate Governance. Aktuelle Themen der Organisationstheorie Edited by: Kahle. 206Wiesbaden
4. Harris, M., 1992. “ Clarifying the Board Role: A Total Activities Approach ”. In Governing, Leading, and Managing Nonprofit Organizations. New Insights from Research and Practice Edited by: Young, D., Hollister, R., and Hodgkinson, V., 18San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Harris, M. Exploring the Role of Boards Using Total Activity Analysis. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 1993, 3, 270
5. Muth, M., and Donaldson, L., 1998. Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6 (1): 5–28. [CSA]
6. Herman, R., and Heimovics, D., 1994. “ Executive Leadership ”. In The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, Edited by: Herman, R., 138Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
7. Chait, R., Holland, T., and Taylor, B., 1996. Improving the Performance of Governing Boards, 5American Council on Education/Oryx Press: Phoenix.
8. Gutenberg, E., 1962. Unternehmensführung. Organisation und Entscheidungen 61fWiesbaden
9. Frese, E., 2000. Grundlagen der Organisation. Konzept–Prinzipien–Strukturen Wiesbaden
10. Allison, M., 2002. Into the Fire: Board and Executive Transitions. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12 (4): 341–51. [CROSSREF][CSA]
11. Anheier, H., Seibel, W., Priller, E., and Zimmer, A., 2002. “ Der Nonprofit Sektor in Deutschland ”. In Handbuch der Nonprofit-Organisation. Strukturen und Management 42Stuttgart
12. Hodgson, G.M., 1998. Competence and Contract in the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Bd., 35: 183 [CSA]
13. Valcárcel, S., 2002. Theorie der Unternehmung und Corporate Governance 385Wiesbaden
14. Harris, M., 1993. Exploring the Role of Boards Using Total Activity Analysis. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 3: 271 [CSA]
15. Siebart, P., 2003. “ Corporate Governance von Nonprofit-Organisationen aus der Perspektive der Principal-Agent-Theorie ”. In Professional Services;, Edited by: Rasche, C., and Wagner, D., München/Mehring.
16. Frey, B.; Jegen, R. Motivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical Evidence; Revised Version, Working Paper No. 49, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, 2000; 3
17. Frey, B., Osterloh, M., and Benz, M., 2001. “ Grenzen variabler Leistungslöhne: Die Rolle intrinsischer Motivation ”. In Die Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Edited by: Jost, P-J., 575Stuttgart.
18. Schaad, M., 1995. Nonprofit Organisationen in der ökonomischen Theorie, Wiesbaden.
19. Gebert, D., 2002. Führung und Innovation, 134Stuttgart.
20. Horch, H-D., 1992. Geld, Macht und Engagement in freiwilligen Vereinigungen, Grundlagen einer Wirtschaftssoziologie von Non-Profit-Organisationen; Berlin.
21. Austin, R.D., and Gittell, J., 1999. Anomalities of High Performance: Reframing Economic and Organizational Theories of Performance Measurement, Working Paper Harvard Business School, Harvard University.
22. Frey, B.; Jegen, R. Motivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical Evidence; Revised Version, Working Paper No.49, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, 2000; 19
23. Chait, R., Holland, T., and Taylor, B., 1996. The New Work of the Nonprofit Board. Harvard Business Review, 74 (Sept–Oct), Reprint 96509[CSA]
24. Osterloh, M., and Rota, S., 2002. “ Fairnessnormen und Anreize in Teams ”. In Organisatorische Veränderung und Corporate Governance. Aktuelle Themen der Organisationstheorie, Edited by: Kahle, E., 124Wiesbaden.
25. Eberl, P., 2002. “ Vertrauen oder Kontrolle im Unternehmen? ”. In Organisatorische Veränderung und Corporate Governance. Aktuelle Themen der Organisationstheorie, Edited by: Kahle, E., 198Wiesbaden.
26. Harris, M., 1992. “ Clarifiying the Board Role: A Total Activities Approach ”. In Governing, Leading, and Managing Nonprofit Organizations. New Insights from Research and Practice, Edited by: Young, D., Hollister, R., and Hodgkinson, V., 28San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Arrow, K., 1980. Wo Organisation endet 75Wiesbaden