A comparison study of image features between FFDM and film mammogram images

Medical Physics

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 4386-4394

  Jing, Hao ^a   Yang, Yongyi ^a   Wernick, Miles N ^a   Yarusso, Laura M ^b   Nishikawa, Robert M ^b  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

clustered microcalcifications; computer aided diagnosis (CAD); full field digital mammography (FFDM); screen film mammography; textural features

Indexed keywords

CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); IMAGE ACQUISITION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING;

CLUSTERED MICROCALCIFICATIONS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS(CAD); FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHIES; TEXTURAL FEATURE;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84864187188     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.4729740     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. J. Tice and M. Feldman, Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: Rays of light through DMIST or more fog., Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 107, 157-165 (2008). 10.1007/s10549-007-9545-4
2. E. Pisano, Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening., N. Eng. J. Med. 353, 1773-1783 (2005). 10.1056/NEJMoa052911
3. R. Rana, Independent evaluation of computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms., Acad. Radiol. 14, 363-370 (2007). 10.1016/j.acra.2006.12.012
4. J. Boone, Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose and image quality evaluation., Radiology 221, 657-667 (2001). 10.1148/radiol.2213010334
5. L. Niklason and B. Christian, Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging., Radiology 205, 399-406 (1997).
6. S. Suryanarayanan, Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography., Acad. Radiol. 7, 1085-1097 (2000). 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80061-6
7. C. KimmeSmith, Mammography fixed grid versus reciprocating grid: Evaluation using cadaveric breasts as test objects., Med. Phys. 23, 141-147 (1996). 10.1118/1.597695
8. J. Shepherd, Measurement of breast density with dual x-ray absorptiometry: Feasibility., Radiology 223, 554-557 (2002). 10.1148/radiol.2232010482
9. H. Chan, Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature space., Med. Phys. 25, 2007-2019 (1998). 10.1118/1.598389
10. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2009 (American Cancer Society (ACS), Atlanta, GA, 2009).
11. M. Elter and A. Horsch, CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: A review., Med. Phys. 36, 2052-2068 (2009). 10.1118/1.3121511
12. H. Soltanian-Zadeh, F. Rafiee-Rad, and S. Pourabdollah-Nejad, Comparison of multiwavelet, wavelet, Haralick, and shape features for microcalcification classification in mammograms., Pattern Recogn. 37, 1973-1986 (2004). 10.1016/j.patcog.2003.03.001
13. R. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein, Textural features for image classification., IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 3, 610-621 (1973). 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
14. Y. Jiang, R. M. Nishikawa, E. E. Wolverton, C. E. Metz, M. L. Giger, R. A. Schmidt, and C. J. Vyborny, Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: Automated feature analysis and classification., Radiology 198, 671-678 (1996).
15. R. Rangayyan, J. Fabio, and J. Desautels, A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs., J. Franklin Inst. 344, 312-348 (2007). 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.09.003
16. M. Salfity, R. Nishikawa, Y. Jiang, and J. Papaioannou, The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification., Med. Phys. 30, 823-831 (2003). 10.1118/1.1559884
17. J. Dengler, S. Benrens, and H. F. Desaga, Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 12, 664-669 (1993). 10.1109/42.251116
18. P. Bunch, A free-response approach to the measurement and characterization of radiographic-observer performance., J. Appl. Photogr. Eng. 4, 166-172 (1978).
19. C. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, Singapore, 2006).
20. C. Metz, B. A. Herman, and J. Shen, Maximum-likelihood estimation of ROC curves from continuously-distributed data., Stat Med. 17, 1033-1053 (1998). 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980515)17:93C1033::AID-SIM7843E3.0.CO;2-Z
21. W. Mendenhall, B. Wackerly, and R. Scheaffer, 15: Nonparametric statistics., in Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 4th ed. (PWS-Kent, Boston, 1989), pp. 674-679.
22. F. Samuelson and N. Petrick, Comparing image detection algorithms using resampling., in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2006), pp. 1312-1315.
23. A. Fischmann, Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: Image quality and lesion detection., Br. J. Radiol. 78, 312-315 (2005). 10.1259/bjr/33317317
24. W. Yang, Comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection and characterization of simulated small masses., Am. J. Roentgenol. 187, W576-W581 (2006). 10.2214/AJR.05.0126
25. X. Rong, Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: Flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screenfilm., Med. Phys. 9, 2052-61 (2002). 10.1118/1.1500768
26. S. Obenauer, K. P. Hermann, C. Schorn, M. Funke, U. Fischer, and E. Grabbe, Full-field digital mammography: A phantom study for detection of microcalcification., Fortschr Röntgenstr. 7, 646-50 (2000).