Adoption of different pantographs preloads to improve multiple collection and speed up existing lines

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 50, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages 403-418

  Bucca, Giuseppe ^a   Carnevale, Marco ^a   Collina, Andrea ^a   Facchinetti, Alan ^a   Drugge, Lars ^b   Jönsson, Per Anders ^b   Stichel, Sebastian ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

current collection; multiple pantograph; pantograph catenary interaction

Indexed keywords

COLLECTOR STRIP; CONTACT WIRE; CRITICAL CONDITION; CURRENT COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC UNITS; MEAN FORCES; MECHANICAL DISTURBANCE; MULTIPLE CURRENTS; PANTOGRAPH-CATENARY INTERACTION; PRELOADS; RAILWAY OPERATIONS; REGULATING SYSTEMS; SERVOVALVES; SUITABLE SOLUTIONS;

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

PANTOGRAPHS;

EID: 84864149885     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2012.665165     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. F. Kießling, R. Puschmann, and A. Schmieder, Contact Lines for Electric Railways. Planning, Design, Implementation, SIEMENS, Publicis Corporate Publishing, Munich, 2001.
2. K. Manabe, T. Morikawa, and M. Hikita, On dynamics of overhead equipment and multi-pantograph system, JRRT Q. Rep. 27 (1986), pp. 21-25. (Pubitemid 16555586)
3. S. Kubo and K. Kato, Effect of arc discharge on wear rate of Cu-impregnated carbon strip in unlubricated sliding against Cu trolley under electric current, Wear 216 (1998), pp. 172-178.
4. G. Bucca and A. Collina, A procedure for the wear prediction of collector strip and contact wire in pantograph-catenary system, Wear 266 (2009), pp. 46-59.
5. G. Bucca, A. Collina, R. Manigrasso, F. Mapelli, and D. Tarsitano, Analysis of electrical interferences related to the current collection quality in the pantograph-catenary interaction, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit. 225 (2011), pp. 483-499.
6. O. Fröidh, Resande och trafik med Gröna taget, Publikation 1001, ISBN 978-91-7415-684-3 (Swedish and English), KTH Railway Group, Stockholm, 2010.
7. A. Collina and S. Bruni, Numerical simulation of pantograph-overhead equipment interaction, Veh. Sys. Dyn. 38 (2002), pp. 261-291.
8. P. Harèll, L. Drugge, and M. Reijm, Study of critical sections in catenary systems during multiple pantograph operation, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit. 219 (2005), pp. 203-211. (Pubitemid 41758172)
9. K.J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedure, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1996.
10. G. Bucca, M. Carnevale, A. Collina, and A. Facchinetti, Analisi dell'interazione dinamica pantografocatenaria in doppia captazione (lungo la linea DD Firenze-Roma), Tech. Rep. (Italian), Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Meccanica, Milan, 2009.
11. G. Bucca, M. Carnevale, A. Collina, and A. Facchinetti, Analisi della qualità della captazione del pantografo ATR95-3kV con striscianti in grafite tipo kasperowski in singola e doppia captazione, Tech. Rep. (Italian), Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Meccanica, Milan, 2009.