The use of historical controls in estimating simultaneous confidence intervals for comparisons against a concurrent control

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3865-3875

  Kitsche, A ^a   Hothorn, L A ^a   Schaarschmidt, F ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Historical controls; Simultaneous confidence intervals; Toxicological bioassays

Indexed keywords

BETA PRIOR; BETA PRIOR DISTRIBUTION; CONCURRENT CONTROL; CONTROL DATA; CONTROL GROUPS; SIMULATION STUDIES; SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREND TESTS; UNTREATED CONTROL;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA HANDLING;

BIOASSAY;

EID: 84864130601     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A. Agresti, and B. Caffo Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and differences of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures American Statistician 55 2000 172 173
2. F. Bretz An extension of the Williams trend test to general unbalanced linear models Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 50 2006 1735 1748
3. F. Bretz, and L.A. Hothorn Detecting dose-response using contrasts: asymptotic power and sample size determination for binomial data Statistics in Medicine 21 2002 3325 3335
4. D.G. Chen Incorporating historical control information into quantal bioassay with Bayesian approach Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54 2010 1646 1656
5. G.E. Dinse, and S.D. Peddada Comparing tumor rates in current and historical control groups in rodent cancer bioassays Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research 3 2011 97 105
6. C.W. Dunnett A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control Journal of the American Statistical Association 50 1955 1096 1121
7. C. Keenan, S. Elmore, S. Francke-Carroll, R. Kemp, R. Kerlin, S. Peddada, J. Pletcher, M. Rinke, S.P. Schmidt, I. Taylor, and D.C. Wolf Best practices for use of historical control data of proliferative rodent lesions Toxicologic Pathology 37 2009 679 693
8. B. Klingenberg Simultaneous score confidence bounds for risk differences in multiple comparisons to a control Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 56 2012 1079 1089
9. Lin, K.K.; 2001. Guidance for industry: statistical aspects of the design, analysis, and interpretation of chronic rodent carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals. US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, CDER.
10. R. Newcombe Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods Statistics in Medicine 17 1998 873 890
11. R Development Core Team, 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
12. R.A. Rigby, and D.M. Stasinopoulos Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 54 2005 507 544
13. F. Schaarschmidt, E. Biesheuvel, and L.A. Hothorn Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 19 2009 292 310
14. F. Schaarschmidt, M. Sill, and L.A. Hothorn Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions Biometrical Journal 50 2008 782 792
15. R.T. Smythe, D. Krewski, and D. Murdoch The use of historical control information in modeling dose-response relationships in carcinogenesis Statistics and Probability Letters 4 1986 87 93
16. R.N. Tamura, and S.S. Young The incorporation of historical control information in tests of proportions: simulation study of Tarone's procedure Biometrics 42 1986 343 349
17. R.N. Tamura, and S.S. Young A stabilized moment estimator for the beta-binomial distribution Biometrics 43 1987 813 824
18. R.E. Tarone The use of historical control information in testing for a trend in proportions Biometrics 38 1982 215 220
19. D.A. Williams Test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control Biometrics 27 1971 103 117