Transitory urbanites: New actors of residential change in Polish and Czech inner cities

Cities

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 318-326

  Haase, Annegret ^a   Grossmann, Katrin ^a   Steinführer, Annett ^b  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b THÜNEN INSTITUTE OF CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Inner city; Polish and Czech cities; Residential change; Transitory urbanites

Indexed keywords

INNER CITY AREA; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; SUBURBANIZATION;

CZECH REPUBLIC; POLAND;

EID: 84864126555     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ahlbrandt R.S., Cunningham J.V. A new public policy for neighborhood preservation 1979, Praeger, New York.
2. Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies 1996, Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, MA, (Studies in Urban and Social Change). G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, I. Szelényi (Eds.).
3. Bierzyński A., Wecławowicz G. Łódź data analysis report 2008, Warsaw, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, (conDENSE Project Paper).
4. Bierzyński A., Grabkowska M., Haase A., Klusáček P., Maas A., Mair J., Martinát S., Sagan I., Steinführer A., Vaishar A., Wecławowicz G., Zapletalová J. Łódź, Gdańsk, Brno and Ostrava and their inner cities: Urban and demographic development during post-socialism. Residential change and demographic challenge. The inner city of East Central Europe in the 21st century 2011, 101-140. Ashgate, Farnham, Burlington. A. Haase, A. Steinführer, S. Kabisch, K. Grossmann, R. Hall (Eds.).
5. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education 1986, 241-258. Greenwood, New York. J.G. Richardson (Ed.).
6. Bouzarovski S. Landscapes of flexibility: Negotiating the everyday; an introduction. GeoJournal 2009, 74:503-506.
7. Boyle P., Halfacree K., Robinson V. Exploring contemporary migration 1998, Harlow, Longman.
8. Burcin, B., & Kučera, T. (2006). Socio-demographic consequences of the renewal of Prague's historical centre and its functional transformation. In G. Enyedi & Z. Kovács (Eds.), Social changes and social sustainability in historical urban centres. The case of Central Europe (pp. 174-188). Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Discussion Papers Special).
9. Buzar [Bouzarovski], S., & Grabkowska, M. (2006). The social reproduction of flexibility in the housing environment: Stories from inner-city Gdańsk. In J. Platje, J. Słodczyk, & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Current issues of sustainable development - Priorities and trends (pp. 157-175). Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski (Economic and Environmental Studies 8).
10. Clay P.L. Neighborhood renewal. Middle class resettlement and incumbent upgrading in American neighborhoods 1979, Heath, Lexington, Mass.
11. Clapham D. Introduction to the special issue - A theory of housing: Problems and potential. Housing, Theory and Society 2009, 26:1-9.
12. Dieleman F.M. Modelling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2001, 16:249-265.
13. Forrest R., Kearns A. Social capital, social cohesion and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies 2001, 38(12):2125-2143.
14. Franz, P. (1989). Stadtteilentwicklung von unten. Zur Dynamik und Beeinflußbarkeit ungeplanter Veränderungsprozesse auf Stadtteilebene. Basel: Birkhäuser (Stadtforschung aktuell, 21).
15. Galster G. On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies 2001, 38:2111-2124.
16. Grigsby W., Baratz G., Galster G., Maclennan D. The dynamics of neighbourhood change and decline 1987, Pergamon, London.
17. Großmann K. Die Symbolische Differenzierung der Stadt. Planungsrundschau 2010, 19:23-41.
18. Haase A., Kabisch S., Steinführer A., Bouzarovski S., Hall R., Ogden P. Emergent spaces of reurbanisation: Exploring the demographic dimension of inner-city residential change in a European setting. Population, Space and Place 2010, 16:443-463.
19. Residential change and demographic challenge. The inner city of East Central Europe in the 21st century 2011, Ashgate, Farnham, Burlington. A. Haase, A. Steinführer, S. Kabisch, K. Grossmann, R. Hall (Eds.).
20. Transformation of cities in Central and Eastern Europe. Towards globalization 2005, United Nations University Press, Tokyo. F.E.I. Hamilton, K. Dimitrowska-Andrews, N. Pichler-Milanović (Eds.).
21. Kendig H.L. A life course perspective on housing attainment. Housing demography. Linking demographic structure and housing markets 1990, 133-156. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, London. D. Myers (Ed.).
22. Kley S. Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework. European Sociological Review 2011, 27:469-486.
23. Kostelecký T. Housing and its influence on the development of social inequalities in the post-communist Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review 2000, 8:177-193.
24. Kovács Z. Social and economic transformation of historical districts in Budapest. Social changes and social sustainability in historical urban centres. The case of Central Europe 2006, 39-64. Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Science, Pécs. G. Enyedi, Z. Kovács (Eds.).
25. Kulu, H., & Milewski, N. (2007). Family change and migration in the life-course: An introduction. Demographic Research, 17(19), 567-590. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.19. <>. http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol17/19/.
26. Littlewood A., Munro M. Moving and improving: Strategies for attaining housing equilibrium. Urban Studies 1997, 34:1771-1787.
27. Lees L., Slater T., Wyly E. The gentrification reader 2010, Routledge, London and New York.
28. Long L.H. The influence of number and ages of children on residential mobility. Demography 1972, 9:371-382.
29. Housing change in East and Central Europe. Integration or fragmentation? 2003, Ashgate, Farnham, Burlington. S. Lowe, S. Tsenkova (Eds.).
30. Lupton, R. (2003). In LSE STICERD (Ed.), Neighbourhood effects: Can we measure them and does it matter? Research paper no. CASE073. <>. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1158964.
31. Lupton, R., & Power, A. (2004). What we know about neighbourhood change: A literature review. London. <> Accessed 30.08.10 (LSE STICERD Research Paper, CASEreport, 27). http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cr/CASEreport27.pdf.
32. Housing policy: An end or a new beginning? 2003, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute, Budapest. M. Lux (Ed.).
33. Mandič S. Residential mobility versus 'in-place' adjustments in Slovenia: Viewpoint from a society 'in transition'. Housing Studies 2001, 16:53-73.
34. Marcińczak S. The socio-spatial structure of post-socialist Łódź, Poland. Results of national census 2002. Bulletin of Geography 2007, 8:65-82. (Socio-Economic Series).
35. Marcińczak S., Sagan I. The socio-spatial restructuring of Łódź. Urban Studies 2011, 48:1809-1989.
36. Massey D.S., Denton N.A. The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces 1988, 67:281-315.
37. Matějů P., Večerník J., Jeřábek H. Social structure, spatial structure and problems of urban research: The example of Prague. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1979, 3:181-202.
38. Merriam S.B. What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning 1995, 4:51-60.
39. Mossberger K., Stoker G. The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review 2001, 36:810-835.
40. Mulder C.H. Housing choice. Assumptions and approaches. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 1996, 11:209-232.
41. Mulder C.H. The family context and residential choice. A challenge for new research. Population, Space and Place 2007, 13:265-278.
42. Mulíček O., Seidenglanz D. Aktuální demografické procesy ve městě Brně a jejich prostorová diferenciace. Díl I: Aktuální demografické procesy 2004, Masarykova univerzita, Výzkumné centrum regionálního rozvoje, Brno.
43. Murzyn M.A. 'Winners' and 'Losers' in the game: The social dimension of urban regeneration in the Kazimierz quarter in Krakow. Social changes and social sustainability in historical urban centres. The case of Central Europe 2006, 81-106. Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs. G. Enyedi, Z. Kovács (Eds.).
44. Ouředníček M. Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region. Geografiska Annaler B 2007, 89:111-126.
45. Park R., McKenzie R., Burgess E. The city: Suggestions for the study of human nature in the urban environment 1925, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
46. Prak N.L., Priemus H. A model for the analysis of the decline of postwar housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1986, 10:1-7.
47. Pichler-Milanović N. Urban housing markets in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence, divergence or policy 'collapse'. European Journal of Housing Policy 2001, 1:145-187.
48. Rossi P.H. Why families move 1980, Sage, Beverly Hills, London, (First Edition in 1955).
49. Sandefur G.D., Scott W.J. A dynamic analysis of migration: An assessment of the effects of age, family and career variables. Demography 1981, 18:355-367.
50. Schnur O. Neighbourhood trek. Vom Chicago Loop nach Bochum-Hamme - Quartiersforschungskonzepte im überblick 2008, Geographisches Institut, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, (Arbeitsberichte, 145).
51. Schwirian K.P. Models of neighborhood change. Annual Review of Sociology 1983, 9:83-102.
52. Skifter Andersen A. Urban sores: On the interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighbourhoods 2003, Ashgate, Aldershot.
53. Šmídová O. Housing stories: Family strategies related to the property maintenance and transfer. Our lives as database. Doing a sociology of ourselves: Czech social transitions in autobiographical research dialogues 2000, 69-88. Karolinum, Praha. Z. Konopásek (Ed.).
54. Standl H., Krupickaite D. Gentrification in Vilnius (Lithuania) - The example of UŽupis. Europa Regional 2004, 12(1):42-51.
55. Stanilov, K. (2007). Housing trends in Central and Eastern European cities during and after the period of transition. In K. Stanilov (Ed.), The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism (pp. 173-190). Dordrecht: Springer (GeoJournal Library; 92).
56. Steinführer A. Wohnstandortentscheidungen und städtische transformation. Vergleichende Fallstudien in Ostdeutschland und Tschechien 2004, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, (Stadtforschung aktuell, 99).
57. Steinführer A., Bierzyński A., Großmann K., Haase A., Klusáček P., Kabisch S. Population decline in Polish and Czech cities during post-socialism? Looking behind the official statistics. Urban Studies 2010, 47:2325-2346.
58. Steinführer, A., Haase, A., & Grabkowska, M. (2011). Households as actors I: Housing careers and housing arrangements. In A. Haase, A. Steinführer, S. Kabisch, K. Grossmann, & R. Hall (Eds.), Residential change and demographic challenge. The inner city of East Central Europe in the 21st century (pp. 185-207). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
59. Strassmann W.P. Residential mobility: Contrasting approaches in Europe and the United States. Housing Studies 2001, 16:7-20.
60. Sunega P., čermák D., Vajdová Z. Dráhy bydlení v čR 1960-2001. Minulá, současná a budoucí stěhování občanů čR ve výzkumu postoje k bydlení 2002, Sociologický ústav Akademie věd, Praha, (Pracovní texty/Working papers, 02/5).
61. Sýkora L. Gentrification in post-communist cities. Gentrification in a global perspective. The new urban colonialism 2005, 91-105. Routledge, London. R. Atkinson, G. Bridge (Eds.).
62. Sýkora L. New socio-spatial formations: Places of residential segregation and separation in Czechia. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2009, 100:417-435.
63. Sýkora L., Kamenický J., Hauptmann P. Changes in the spatial structure of Prague and Brno in the 1990s. Acta Universitatis Carolinae - Geographica 2000, 35:61-76.
64. Szelényi I. Urban inequalities under state socialism 1983, Oxford University Press, New York.
65. Temelová J. Flagship developments and the physical upgrading of the post-socialist inner city: The golden angel project in Prague. Geografiska Annaler B 2007, 89:169-181.
66. Temkin K., Rohe W. Neighborhood change and urban policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1996, 15(3):159-170.
67. Uchman, R., & Adamski, J. (2003). How to meet the market rules and social goals for housing? Local government and housing in Poland. In M. Lux (Ed.), Housing policy: An end or a new beginning? (pp. 117-181). Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute.
68. van Beckhoven, E., Bolt, G., & van Kempen, R. (2005). Theories of neighborhood change and neighborhood decline: Their significance for post-WWII large housing estates. In Paper presented at the ENHR conference " Housing in Europe: New Challenges and innovations in Tomorrow's Cities" , Reykjavik, 29 June-2 July, 2005.
69. Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives 2012, Springer, Dordrecht. M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, D. Maclennan (Eds.).
70. van Kempen R. The academic formulations: Explanations for the partitioned city. Of states and cities: The partitioning of urban space 2002, 35-58. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P. Marcuse, R. van Kempen (Eds.).
71. Wecławowicz, G. (2005). Poland. In R. Kempen, M. van, Vermeulen, & A. Baan (Eds.), Urban issues and urban policies in the new EU countries (pp. 61-77). Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate (EURICUR series).