Optimal design of actively controlled adjacent structures for balancing the mutually conflicting objectives in design preference aspects

Engineering Structures

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 213-222

  Park, Kwan Soon ^a   Ok, Seung Yong ^b  

^a Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^b Hankyong National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Active control; Adjacent structures; Balanced performance; Optimal design; Preference; Seismic excitations

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE CONTROL; ADJACENT STRUCTURES; BALANCED PERFORMANCE; OPTIMAL DESIGN; PREFERENCE; SEISMIC EXCITATIONS;

CONTROL SYSTEMS; DESIGN; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

ACTIVE CONTROL; BUILDING; CONTROL SYSTEM; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; VIBRATION;

EID: 84864117546     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Klein RE, Cusano C, Stukel J. Investigation of a method to stabilize wind induced oscillations in large structures. In: Proc ASME winter annual meeting. Paper no. 72-WA/AUT-H; 1972.
2. Westermo B. The dynamics of interstructural connections to prevent pounding. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1989, 18:687-699.
3. Gurley K, Kareem A, Bergman LA, Johnson EA, Klein RE. Coupling tall buildings for control of response to wind. In: Schueller, Shinozuko, Yao (Eds.), Proc 6th int conf, structural safety and reliability. Rotherdam, Netherlands: Balkema Publishers; 1994. p. 1553-60.
4. Kim J., Ryu J., Chung L. Seismic performance of structures connected by viscoelastic dampers. Eng Struct 2006, 28(2):183-195.
5. Bhaskararao A.V., Jangid R.S. Seismic analysis of structures connected with friction dampers. Eng Struct 2006, 28(5):690-703.
6. Lu X., Gong Z., Weng D., Ren X. The application of a new structural control concept for tall building with large podium structure. Eng Struct 2007, 29(8):1833-1844.
7. Ok S.Y., Song J., Park K.S. Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method. Eng Struct 2008, 30(5):1240-1248.
8. Seto K. Vibration control method for flexible structures arranged in parallel. In: Proc, 1st world conference on structural control, vol. 2, Pasadena, California; 1994; p. 62-71.
9. Yamada Y, Ikawa N, Yokoyama H, Tachibana E. Active control of structures using the joining member with negative stiffness. In: Proc, 1st world conference on structural control, vol. 2, Pasadena, California; 1994. p. 41-9.
10. Christenson R.E., Spencer B.F., Johnson E.A., Seto K. Coupled building control considering the effects of building/connector configuration. J Struct Eng ASCE 2006, 132(6):853-863.
11. Ying Z.G., Ni Y.Q., Ko J.M. Non-linear stochastic optimal control for coupled-structures system of multi-degree-of-freedom. J Sound Vib 2004, 274(3-5):843-861.
12. Klein RE, Healy MD. Semi-active control of wind induced oscillations in structures. In: Proc 2nd international conference on structural control. Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo [15-17 July 1985, reprinted in structural control. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nij-hoff Publishers; 1987. p. 354-69].
13. Christenson RE, Spencer BF. Coupled building control using 'smart' dampers. In: Proc, 13th engineering mechanics division conf. Baltimore, Reston Va (CD-ROM): ASCE; 1999.
14. Bharti S.D., Dumne S.M., Shrimali M.K. Seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings connected with MR dampers. Eng Struct 2010, 32(8):2122-2133.
15. Luco J.E., De Barros F.C.P. Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1998, 7(7):649-659.
16. Zhang W.S., Xu Y.L. Dynamic characteristics and seismic response of adjacent buildings linked by discrete dampers. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1999, 28(10):1163-1185.
17. Xu Y.L., He Q., Ko J.M. Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Eng Struct 1999, 21:135-148.
18. Ni Y.Q., Ko J.M., Ying Z.G. Random seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings coupled with non-linear hysteretic dampers. J Sound Vib 2001, 246(3):403-417.
19. Messac A., Wilson B.H. Physical programming for computational control. AIAA J 1998, 36(2):219-226.
20. ∞ methods 1998, Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.
21. Lewis F.L. Applied optimal control and estimation 1992, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. Kirk D.E. Optimal control theory - an introduction 1970, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Alavinasab A., Moharrami H. Active control of structures using energy-based LQR method. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 2006, 21:605-611.
24. Fonseca C.M., Fleming P.J. An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multi-objective optimization. Evol Comput 1995, 3(1):1-16.
25. Deb K., Pratap A., Agrawal S., Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evol Comput 2002, 6:182-197.
26. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. Technical report 103. Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland: Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich; 2001.
27. Deb K. Current trends in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Int J Simul Multi Des Optim 2007, 1:1-8.
28. Coello C.A.C., Pulido G.T., Montes E.M. Current and future research trends in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Information processing with evolutionary algorithms: from industrial applications to academic speculations 2005, Springer-Verlag, p. 213-31.
29. Deb K, Saxena DK. Searching for pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain large-dimensional multi-objective optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the world congress on, computational intelligence (WCCI-2006); 2006. p. 3352-60.
30. Corne DW, Knowles JD. Techniques for highly multi-objective optimization: some nondominated points are better than others. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. New York, NY, USA: The Association of Computing Machinery (ACM); 2007. p. 773-80.
31. Brockhoff D, Zitzler E. Are all objectives necessary? On dimensionality reduction in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: PPSN IX. Springer LNCS; 2006. p. 533-42.
32. Park K.S., Koh H.M. Preference-based optimum design of an integrated structural control system using genetic algorithms. Adv Eng Softw 2004, 35:85-94.
33. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning 1989, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
34. Davis L. The handbook of genetic algorithms 1991, Van Nostrand Reingold, New York.
35. Michalewicz Z. Genetic algorithms+data structures=evolution programs. AI series 1994, Springer-Verlag, New York.