Estimating the marginal cost of quality improvements: The case of the UK electricity distribution companies

Energy Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1498-1506

  Jamasb, Tooraj ^a   Orea, Luis ^b   Pollitt, Michael ^c  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electricity distribution cost; Marginal cost; Quality service; Social welfare

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES; ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; INCENTIVE MECHANISM; MARGINAL COSTS; NETWORK UTILITY; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS; POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY LEVELS; QUALITY SERVICES; REGULATORY INCENTIVES; SERVICE INTERRUPTION; SERVICE QUALITY; SOCIAL WELFARE; WELFARE EFFECTS; WELFARE LOSS;

COST ACCOUNTING; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ESTIMATION; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

COST ESTIMATING;

COST; ECONOMETRICS; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INCENTIVE; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; WELFARE IMPACT;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84864112953     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Accent Expectations of DNOs and WTP for improvements in service. A report for OFGEM, July 2008, Accent and Ofgem, London.
2. Allan R.N., Kariuki K.K. Reliability worth assessments of electrical distribution networks. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 1999, 15:79-85.
3. Cronin F.J., Motluk S.A. How effective are M&As in distribution? Evaluating the government's policy of using mergers and amalgamations to drive efficiencies into Ontario's LDCs. Electr. J. 2007, 20(3):60-68.
4. Filippini M. Are municipal electricity distribution utilities natural monopolies?. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 1998, 69(2):157-174.
5. Giannakis D., Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: an application to the UK electricity distribution networks. Energy Policy 2005, 33(1):2256-2271.
6. Guldmann J.M. A disaggregate econometric analysis of electricity distribution capital costs. Energy 1985, 10(5):601-612.
7. Huang Y., Chen K.H., Yang C.H. Cost efficiency and optimal scale of electricity distribution firms in Taiwan: an application of metafrontier analysis. Energy Econ. 2010, 32(1):15-23.
8. Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Util. Policy 2001, 9(3):107-130.
9. Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: lessons of experience from Britain. Energy Policy 2007, 35(12):6163-6187.
10. Jamasb T., Orea L., Pollitt M. Weather conditions and performance of electricity distribution networks: A methodological and econometric approach. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics CWPE / Electricity Policy Research Group EPRG 10XX, February 2010, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
11. Joskow P.L. Incentive regulation in theory and practice: electricity distribution and transmission networks. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0607 and Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper Series no. 0511 2006.
12. Kariuki K.K., Allan R.N. Evaluation of reliability worth and value of lost load. IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib. 1996, 143(2):171-180.
13. Ofgem Executive summary to consumer survey, consumer expectations of DNOs and WTP for improvements in service report 2004, Accent Marketing & Research, London.
14. Salvanes K., Tjøtta S. A test for natural monopoly with application to Norwegian electricity distribution. Rev. Ind. Organ. 1998, 13(6):669-685.
15. Sappington D. Regulating service quality: a survey. J. Regul. Econ. 2005, 27(2):123-154.
16. Shleifer A. A theory of yardstick competition. RAND J. Econ. 1985, 16(3):319-327. (Autumn).
17. Tangeras T. Yardstick competition and quality. J. Econ. Manag. Strateg. 2009, 18(2):589-613.
18. Ter-Martirosyan A. The Effects of Incentive Regulation on Quality of Service in Electricity Markets. Working paper 2003, George Washington University.
19. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
20. Yatchev A. Scale economies in electricity distribution: a semiparametric analysis. J. Appl. Econ. 2000, 15(2):187-210.
21. Yu W., Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Willingness-to-pay for quality of service: an application to efficiency analysis of the UK electricity distribution utilities. Energy J. 2009, 30(4):1-48.
22. Yu W., Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Does weather explain cost and quality performance? An analysis of UK electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy 2009, 37(11):4177-4188.