Real-Time PCR Detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3985-3991

  Martín, Maria Teresa ^a   Cobos, Rebeca ^a   Martín, Laura ^a   López Enríquez, Lorena ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AGRARIO DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL MEASURES; DEFENSIVE MEASURES; DNA PURIFICATION; ECONOMIC LOSS; LIMITS OF DETECTION; REAL-TIME PCR; SPECIFIC SEQUENCES; WOOD SAMPLES;

DNA; LOSSES; PATHOGENS; PURIFICATION; WOOD PRODUCTS;

POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

FUNGAL DNA; PRIMER DNA;

DETECTION METHOD; FUNGAL DISEASE; FUNGUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; PATHOGENICITY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPORE;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVALUATION; FUNGUS SPORE; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT DISEASE; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VITIS;

ASCOMYCOTA; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, FUNGAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PLANT DISEASES; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPORES, FUNGAL; VITIS;

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DISEASES; FORESTRY; FUNGI; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PURIFICATION; WOOD PRODUCTS;

FUNGI; PHAEOACREMONIUM ALEOPHILUM; PHAEOMONIELLA CHLAMYDOSPORA;

EID: 84864110122     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07360-11     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abbatecola A, Pollastro S, Pichierri A, Faretra F. 2006. Survey on the presence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in grapevine rootstocks. J. Plant Pathol. 88:S31.
2. Aroca A, Raposo R. 2007. PCR-based strategy to detect and identify species of Phaeoacremonium causing grapevine diseases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:2911-2918.
3. Aroca A, Raposo R, Lunello P. 2008. A biomarker for the identification of four Phaeoacremonium species using the _-tubulin gene as the target sequence. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80:1131-1140.
4. Borie B, Jacquiot L, Jamaux-Despréaux I, Larignon P, Péros JP. 2002. Genetic diversity in populations of the fungi Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum on grapevine in France. Plant Pathol. 51:85-96.
5. Bustin SA, et al. 2009. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 55: 611-622.
6. Cobos R, Martin MT. 2008. Molecular characterization of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora isolated from grapevines in Castilla y León (Spain). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 47:20 -27.
7. Crous PW, Gams W. 2000. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora General et comb. nov., the causal organism of Petri grapevine decline. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:112-118.
8. Crous PW, Gam W, Wingfield MJ, Wyk PS. 1996. Phaeoacremonium gen. nov. associated with wilt and decline disease of woody host and human infection. Mycologia 88:786 -796.
9. Damm U, Mostert L, Crous PW, Fourie PH. 2008. Novel Phaeoacremonium species associated with necrotic wood of Prunus trees. Persoonia 20:87-102.
10. Dupont J, Laloui W, Magnins S, Larignon P, Roquebert MF. 2000. Phaeoacremonium viticola, a new species associated with esca of grapevine in France. Mycologia 92:499 -504.
11. Edwards J, Pascoe IG. 2004. Occurrence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum associated with Petri disease and esca in Australian grapevine. Australas. Plant Pathol. 33:273-279.
12. Edwards J, Constable F, Wiechel T, Salib S. 2007. Comparison of the molecular tests single PCR, nested PCR and quantitative PCR (SYBRGreen and TaqMan) for detection of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora during grapevine nursery propagation. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 46:58 -72.
13. Essakhis S, Mugnai L, Crous PW, Gronewald JZ, Surico G. 2008. Molecular and phenotypic characterisation of novel Phaeoacremonium species isolated from esca diseased grapevines. Persoonia 21:119 -134.
14. Reference deleted
15. Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1323-1330.
16. Gramaje D, Armengol J, Mohammadi H, Banihashemi Z, Mostert L. Novel Phaeoacremonium species associated with Petri disease and esca of grapevine in Iran and Spain. Mycologia 101:920 -929.
17. Gramaje D, Armengol J. 2011. Fungal trunk pathogens in the grapevine propagation process: potential inoculum sources, detection, identification and management strategies. Plant Dis. doi:10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0025.
18. Guarro J, et al. 2003. Two cases of subcutaneous infection due to Phaeoacremonium spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1332-1336.
19. Halleen F, Crous PW, Petrini O. 2003. Fungi associated with healthy grapevine cutting in nurseries with special reference to pathogens involved in the decline of young vines. Australas. Plant Pathol. 32:47-52.
20. Larignon P, Dubos B. 1997. Fungi associate with esca disease in grapevine. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:147-157.
21. López-Enríquez L, Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Hernández M. 2007. Quantitative detection of Clostridium tyrobutyricum in milk by real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:3747-3751.
22. Martin MT, Cobos R. 2007. Identification of fungi associated with grapevine decline in Castilla y León (Spain). Phytopathol. Mediterr. 46:18 -25.
23. Mostert L, Groenewald JZ, Summerbell RC, Gams W, Crous PW. 2006. Taxonomy and pathology of Togninia (Diaporthales) and its Phaeoacremonium anamorphs. Stud. Mycol. 54:1-115.
24. Mugnai L, Granini A, Surico G. 1999. Esca (Black Measles) and brown wood-streaking: two old and elusive diseases of grapevines. Plant Dis. 83:404-418.
25. O'Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:103-116.
26. Overton BE, Stewart EL, Qu X, Wenner NG, Christ BJ. 2004. Qualitative real-time PCR SYBR-Green detection of Petri disease fungi. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 43:403- 410.
27. Pollastro S, Dongiovanni C, Abbatecola A, Faretra F. 2000. Observations on the fungi associated with esca and on spatial distribution of esca symptomatic plants in Apulian (Italy) vineyards. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:206 -210.
28. Rego C, Oliveira H, Carvalho A, Phillips A. 2000. Involvement of Phaeoacremonium spp and Cylindrocarpon destructans with grapevine decline in Portugal. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39:76 -79.
29. Retief E, McLeod A, Fourie RH. 2006. Potential inoculums sources of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in South Africa grapevine nurseries. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 115:331-339.
30. Ridgway HJ, Sleight BE, Stewart A. 2002. Molecular evidence for the presence of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora in New Zealand vineyards and its detection in grapevine wood using species specific PCR. Australas. Plant Pathol. 31:267-271.
31. Scheck HJ, Vasquez SJ, Gubler WD, Fogle D. 1998. First report of three Phaeoacremonium spp. causing young grapevine decline in California. Plant Dis. 82:590.
32. Sparapano L, Bruno G, Granini A. 2000. Effect on plants of metabolites produced in culture by Phaeoacremonium aleophilum, Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum and Fomitiporia punctata. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 39: 169-177.
33. Tegli S, Bertelli E, Surico G. 2000. Sequence analysis of ITS ribosomal DNA in five Phaeoacremonium species and development of a PCR-based assay for the detection of P. chlamydosporum and P. aleophilum in grapevine tissue. Phytopathol Mediterr. 39:134 -149.
34. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, p 315-322. In Innis M, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (ed), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.