Using redundant visual information from different dimensions for attentional selection

Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 99-104

  Berti, Stefan ^a   Wühr, Peter ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Event related brain potentials (ERPS); N200; N2p; Redundant target effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTIONAL SELECTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OBJECT RELATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION;

EID: 84864104873     PISSN: 02698803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000072     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 396-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Berti, S. (2011). The attentional blink demonstrates automatic deviance processing in vision. NeuroReport, 22, 664-667.
3. Folstein, J. R., & van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170.
4. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a ''dimension-weighting'' account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
5. Gramann, K., Töllner, T., Krummenacher, J., Eimer, M., & Müller, H. J. (2007). Brain electrical correlates of dimensional weighting: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 44, 277-292.
6. Kiss, M., van Velzen, J., & Eimer, M. (2008). The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing. Psychophysiology, 45, 240-249.
7. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291-308.
8. Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Eventrelated potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 432-440.
9. Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18.
10. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
11. Miller, J., Beutinger, D., & Ulrich, R. (2009). Visuospatial attention and redundancy gain. Psychological Research, 73, 254-262.
12. Miniussi, C., Girelli, M., & Marzi, C. A. (1998). Neural site of the redundant target effect: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 216-230.
13. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 357-366.
14. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
15. Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (1998). Speeded responses to audio-visual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology, 35, 755-759.
16. Schubö, A., Meinecke, C., & Schröger, E. (2001). Automaticity and attention: Investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 341-361.
17. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1-29.
18. Tarbi, E. C., Sun, X., Holcomb, P. J., & Daffner, K. R. (2011). Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention. Psychophysiology, 48, 624-632.
19. Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Gramann, K., & Müller, H. J. (2011). Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex. PLoS ONE, 6, (e16276). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016276
20. Treisman, A. (2009). Attention: Theoretical and psychological perspectives. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 189-204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.