Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy methods in Rize province (NE Turkey)

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 2063-2073

  Reis, S ^a   Yalcin, A ^a   Atasoy, M ^a   Nisanci, R ^b   Bayrak, T ^c   Erduran, M ^b   Sancar, C ^b   Ekercin, S ^a  

^a AKSARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c GUMUSHANE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AHP; Landslide; Rize; Satellite imagery; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

AHP; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DRAINAGE DENSITY; FIELD STUDIES; FREQUENCY RATIOS; LAND COVER; LANDSLIDE CAUSAL FACTORS; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; LOCATION DATA; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY; RIZE; SLOPE ANGLES; SLOPE ASPECT; STUDY AREAS; SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPS; VALIDATION RESULTS;

GEOMORPHOLOGY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LITHOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING; ROADS AND STREETS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

LANDSLIDES;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; DAMAGE; DATA SET; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DRAINAGE NETWORK; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GIS; LAND COVER; LANDSLIDE; LITHOLOGY; MODEL VALIDATION; RASTER; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SLOPE ANGLE; STREAM;

RIZE [RIZE (PRV)]; RIZE [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84864081421     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-1432-y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1: 73-81.
2. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81: 432-445.
3. Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol 44: 949-962.
4. Chung CJF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30(3): 451-472.
5. Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 43(3): 381-391.
6. Galli M, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach R (2008) Comparing landslide inventory maps. Geomorphology 94: 268-289.
7. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinalli M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31: 181-216.
8. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Landslide hazard assessment in the Staffora basin, northern Italian Apennines. Geomorphology 72: 272-299.
9. Karsli F, Atasoy M, Yalcin A, Reis S, Demir O, Gokceoglu C (2009) Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey). Environ Monit Assess 156: 241-255.
10. Komac M (2006) A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 74(1-4): 17-28.
11. Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40: 1095-1113.
12. Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47: 982-990.
13. Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 25(11): 2037-2052.
14. Reis S, Yomralioglu T (2006) Detection of current and potential hazelnut (corylus) plantation areas in Trabzon, North East Turkey using GIS & RS. J Environ Biol 27(4): 653-659.
15. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15: 234-281.
16. Saaty TL, Vargas GL (2001) Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic, Boston.
17. Saha AK, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2002) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) valey, Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 23(2): 357-369.
18. Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71: 303-321.
19. Voogd H (1983) Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion Ltd., London.
20. Yalcin A (2007) Environmental impacts of landslides: a case study from East Black Sea region, Turkey. Environ Eng Sci 24(6): 821-833.
21. Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72: 1-12.
22. Yalcin A, Bulut F (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey). Nat Hazards 41: 201-226.
23. Yalcin A, Reis S, Aydinoglu AC, Yomralioglu T (2011) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, NE Turkey. Catena 85: 274-287.