DSM-5 Paraphilic Diagnoses and SVP law

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 533-

  Tucker, Douglas ^a,b   Brakel, Samuel Jan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DePaul University ^*  (United States)

^c DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; LETTER; SEXUAL DEVIATION;

COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; PARAPHILIAS;

EID: 84864070419     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-011-9893-3     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Frances, A. (2010). The forensic risks of DSM-Vand how to avoid them. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 11-14.
2. Franklin, K. (2010). Hebephilia: Quintessence of diagnostic pretextuality. Behavioral Science and the Law, 28, 751-768.
3. Zander, T. K. (2008). Commentary: Inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 459-469.
4. Zonana, H. (1997). The civil commitment of sex offenders. Science, 278, 1248-1249.