Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: Virtual reality simulator training

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1986-1996

  Panel, Pierre ^a   Bajka, Michael ^b   Le Tohic, Arnaud ^a   El Ghoneimi, Alaa ^c   Chis, Carmen ^d   Cotin, Stéphane ^e  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE VERSAILLES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c HÔPITAL ROBERT DEBRÉ   (France)

^d BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^e INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Education; Endoscopy; Gynaecology obstetrics; Imaging VR

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE VALIDITY; GYNECOLOGIST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTEROSCOPY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84864066556     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2139-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Satava RM (1993) Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc 7:203-205
2. Haluck RS, Krummel TM (2000) Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135:786-792
3. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ, Matsumoto ED, Cusimano MD (2002) Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet 359:230-231
4. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2009) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006575. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD006575.pub2
5. ® pbc clinical study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:364-370
6. Litta P, Cosmi E, Sacco G, Saccardi C, Ciavattini A, Ambrosini G (2005) Hysteroscopic permanent tubal sterilization using a niticol-dacron intratubal device without anaesthesia in the outpatient setting: procedure feasibility and effectiveness. Hum Reprod 20:3419-3422
7. Vleugels MPH, Veersema S (2005) Hysteroscopic sterilization in the out patient department without anaesthesia. Gynecol Surg 2:155-158
8. ®: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting. Fertil Steril 82:196-199
9. Sinha D, Kalathy V, Gupta JK, Clark TJ (2007) The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation. BJOG 114:676-683
10. Kerin JF, Cooper JM, Price T, Herendael BJ, Cayuela-Font E, Cher D, Carignan CS (2003) Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre phase II study. Hum Reprod 18:1223-1230
11. Panel P, Grosdemouge I (2010) Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients. Fertil Steril 93:29-34
12. ®. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 37:389-395
13. Levie MD, Chudnoff SG (2005) Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:318-322
14. Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L (1997) A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:255-258
15. Cicinelli E, Parisi C, Galantino P, Pinto V, Barba B, Schonauer S (2003) Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6, 000 cases. Fertil Steril 80:199-202
16. ® micro-insert placement by vaginoscopy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36:1239-1240
17. Jansen FW, Corla B, Vredevoogd Van, Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC (2000) Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 96:266-270
18. Shveiky D, Rojansky N, Revel A, Benshushan A, Laufer N, Shushan A (2007) Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: "beyond the learning curve.". J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:218-222
19. Lousquy R, Friederich L, Le Tohic A, Grosdemouge I, Renouvel F, Gairin F, Panel P (2009) Etat des lieux de la formation des chirurgiens gynéologues à l'hystéroscopie en France et en Europe. Enquête CONFORM sur la formation à la mise en place des implants de stérilisation tubaire par voie transcervicale. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 37:691-696
20. Rosen DM (2004) Learning curve for hysteroscopic sterilisation: lessons from the first 80 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 44:62-64
21. Bajka M, Tuchschmid S, Streich M, Fink D, Székely G, Harders M (2009) Evaluation of a new virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy. Surg Endosc 23:2026-2033
22. Bajka M, Tuchschmid S, Fink D, Székely G, Harders M (2010) Establishing construct validity of a virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy via a multimetric scoring system. Surg Endosc 24:79-88
23. Tuchschmid S, Bajka M, Szczerba D, Lloyd BA, Székely G, Harders M (2008) Modeling intravasation of liquid distension media in surgical simulators. Med Image Anal 12:567-576
24. Tuchschmid S, Bajka M, Szczerba D, Lloyd B, Székely G, Harders M (2007) Modelling intravasation of liquid distension media in surgical simulators. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 10:717-724
25. Harders M, Bajka M, Spaelter U, Tuchschmid S, Bleuler H, Szekely G (2006) Highly-realistic, immersive training environment for hysteroscopy. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:176-181
26. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM (2003) Fundamental principles of validation and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 17:1535-1539
27. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2002) Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 16:1764-1770
28. Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Monteny LJ, Dankelman J (2006) Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO. Surg Endosc 20:511-518
29. Ayodeji ID, Schijven M, Jakimowicz J, Greve JW (2007) Face validation of the Simbionix LAP Mentor virtual reality training module and its applicability in the surgical curriculum. Surg Endosc 21:1641-1649
30. Cao CG, MacKenzie CL, Ibbotson JA, Turner LJ, Blair NP, Nagy AG (1999) Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 62:83-89
31. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327:1032-1037
32. Tuchschmid S (2010) High fidelity surgical simulator for hysteroscopy. PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich
33. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16(12):1746-1752
34. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364-372
35. Mackay S, Datta V, Chang A, Shah J, Kneebone R, Darzi A (2003) Multiple objective measures of skill (MOMS): a new approach to the assessment of technical ability in surgical trainees. Ann Surg 238:291-300
36. Van Dongen KW, Tournoij E, van der Zee DC, Schijven MP, Broeders IA (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21:1413-1417