Reproducibility and accuracy of non-invasive measurement of infarct size in mice with high-resolution PET/CT

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 492-499

  Greco, Adelaide ^a,b   Petretta, Maria Piera ^a   Larobina, Michele ^c   Gargiulo, Sara ^a,b   Panico, Mariarosaria ^c   Nekolla, Stephan G ^d   Esposito, Giovanni ^a   Petretta, Mario ^a   Brunetti, Arturo ^a,b,c   Cuocolo, Alberto ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b CEINGE BIOTECNOLOGIE AVANZATE   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

18F FDG; Infarct size; Measurement; Mouse; PET CT

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE SIZE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MALE; MOUSE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84864055464     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: 15326551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9538-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Higuchi T, Nekolla SG, Jankaukas A, Weber AW, Huisman MC, Reder S, et al. Characterization of normal and infarcted rat myocardium using a combination of small-animal PET and clinical MRI. J Nucl Med 2007;48:288-94. (Pubitemid 47555356)
2. Stegger L, Hoffmeier AN, Schäfers KP, Hermann S, Schober O, Schäfers MA, et al. Accurate noninvasive measurement of infarct size in mice with high-resolution PET. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1837-44. (Pubitemid 47545006)
3. Klocke R, Tian W, Kuhlmann MT, Nikol S. Surgical animal models of heart failure related to coronary heart disease. Cardio-vasc Res 2007;74:29-38. (Pubitemid 46366944)
4. Ratering D, Baltes C, Dörries C, Rudin M. Accelerated cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the mouse heart using self-gated parallel imaging strategies does not compromise accuracy of structural and functional measures. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010;12:43-55.
5. Kudo T, Fukuchi K, Annala AJ, Chatziioannou AF, Allada V, Dahlbom M, et al. Noninvasive measurement of myocardial activity concentrations and perfusion defect sizes in rats with a new small-animal positron emission tomograph. Circulation 2002;106:118-23. (Pubitemid 34747451)
6. Liu Z, Kastis GA, Stevenson GD, Barrett HH, Furenlid LR, Ku-pinski MA, et al. Quantitative analysis of acute myocardial infarct in rat hearts with ischemia-reperfusion using a high-resolution stationary SPECT system. J Nucl Med 2002;43:933-9. (Pubitemid 34747819)
7. Wu MC, Gao DW, Sievers RE, Lee RJ, Hasegawa BH, Dae MW. Pinhole single-photon emission computed tomography for myo-cardial perfusion imaging of mice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42: 576-82. (Pubitemid 36951729)
8. Nekolla SG, Miethaner C, Nguyen N, Ziegler SI, Schwaiger M. Reproducibility of polar map generation and assessment of defect severity and extent assessment in myocardial perfusion imaging using positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25: 1313-21. (Pubitemid 28446059)
9. Oh BH, Ono S, Rockman HA, Ross J Jr. Myocardial hypertrophy in the ischemic zone induced by exercise in rats after coronary reperfusion. Circulation 1993;87:598-607. (Pubitemid 23040930)
10. Lin LI-K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
11. Shrout PE, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
12. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996;l:30-46. (Pubitemid 126421252)
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986;12:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
14. Saraste A, Nekolla SG, Schwaiger M. Cardiovascular molecular imaging: An overview. Cardiovasc Res 2009;83:643-52.
15. Ferro A, Pellegrino T, Spinelli L, Acampa W, Petretta M, Cuocolo A. Comparison between dobutamine echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomography for interpretive repro-ducibility. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1239-44. (Pubitemid 47498281)
16. Scherrer-Crosbie M, Steudel W, Ullrich R, Hunziker PR, Liel-Cohen N, Newell J, et al. Echocardiographic determination of risk area size in a murine model of myocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1999;277:H986-92. (Pubitemid 29459613)
17. Wollenweber T, Zach C, Rischpler C, Fischer R, Nowak S, Nekolla SG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging is feasible for infarct size quantification in mice using a clinical single-photon emission computed tomography system equipped with pinhole collimators. Mol Imaging Biol 2010;12:427-34.
18. Conci E, Pachinger O, Metzler B. Mouse models for myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion. J Cardiol 2006;13:239-44. (Pubitemid 44167098)
19. Hashimoto K, Uehara T, Ishida Y, Nonogi H, Kusuoka H, Nishimura T. Paradoxical uptake of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose by successfully reperfused myocardium during the sub-acute phase in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Ann Nucl Med 1996;10:93-8. (Pubitemid 26117347)
20. Lee WW, Marinelli B, van der Laan AM, Sena BF, Gorbatov R, Leuschner F, et al. PET/MRI of inflammation in myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:153-63.